TASOS Posted September 6, 2007 Share Posted September 6, 2007 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=588457Prescott 2.8A in 2.8E category This entry above has not been fixed. http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=642959 Bench run @ 640x480 16bit Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bartleby Posted September 6, 2007 Share Posted September 6, 2007 hi, http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=562603. it's not the good CPU because on the datasheet of Athlon XP 1600+ the L2 cache is 256ko and not 64ko as Duron or Athlon T-bird look on the vaidation: http://valid.x86-secret.com/show_oc.php?id=115996 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Undertaker Posted September 6, 2007 Share Posted September 6, 2007 So many errors on Spi1M in "Pentium 4 3.0Ghz Northwood" category... All reported. Thanks. Under Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Just Learnin' Posted September 7, 2007 Share Posted September 7, 2007 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=643495 , http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=641679 Links and descriptions are for Presler, results are in 3.4C Northwood category. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TASOS Posted September 7, 2007 Share Posted September 7, 2007 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=643495 ' date=' http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=641679 Links and descriptions are for Presler, results are in 3.4C Northwood category.[/quote'] Fixed by me. I edited the entries and put the correct cpu. *The submitted results (in the forum) are correct. The bot seems to do the missmatch ? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lanc Posted September 7, 2007 Share Posted September 7, 2007 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=639008 - need more proof, he probably run 3dmark in very low resolution - becouse second man in this category have C2D @ 4Ghz and high clocked card and have only 11k. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Narmer Posted September 7, 2007 Share Posted September 7, 2007 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=591236 score from pcmark, not from 3dmark05 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bwanasoft Posted September 7, 2007 Share Posted September 7, 2007 can you fix the first three places ? One iss AMD 64 - Mobile CPU - the third i can not find any Picture or Verification http://www.hwbot.org/quickSearch.do?hardwareId=CPU_1131 thx Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Undertaker Posted September 7, 2007 Share Posted September 7, 2007 Up... ? So many errors on Spi1M in "Pentium 4 3.0Ghz Northwood" category...All reported. Thanks. Under Wrong cpu : http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=628637 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=506055 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=546593 Need more proof : http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=506893 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bwanasoft Posted September 7, 2007 Share Posted September 7, 2007 here the thame the first two are XP CPU´s http://www.hwbot.org/quickSearch.do?hardwareId=CPU_1130 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
71proste Posted September 8, 2007 Share Posted September 8, 2007 http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=554804 The projects id is not valid - it is possible that this project has not been published http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=547634 The projects id is not valid - it is possible that this project has not been published http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=605603 The projects id is not valid - it is possible that this project has not been published http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=640993 is it 7800GTX or 7800GTX 512mb???hmm... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
harleybro Posted September 10, 2007 Share Posted September 10, 2007 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=626714 the screen shows 9.593 not 9 seconds. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
yozuri Posted September 10, 2007 Share Posted September 10, 2007 thank you for fixing moonmans wPrime 32m from 19 sec to 19sec 700ms as his screenshot shows. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
71proste Posted September 11, 2007 Share Posted September 11, 2007 http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=645496 hard to belive,can anyone tell me is it true result?e6300@3.6Ghz score 16k? ok i see now...Transparent Windows 7347.29 Windows/s hmm..wow... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
THRASHER2 Posted September 12, 2007 Author Share Posted September 12, 2007 here the thame the first two are XP CPU´s http://www.hwbot.org/quickSearch.do?hardwareId=CPU_1130 lol> That's a Sempron score Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Maxi Posted September 12, 2007 Share Posted September 12, 2007 All fixed on this page; please note we do not typically block scores over 1 year old for missing verification. maxi Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bwanasoft Posted September 12, 2007 Share Posted September 12, 2007 lol> That's a Sempron score oh yes somebody link stupid benchresults here more Athlon XP Sempron 2600+ MP CPU in this categorie http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=639739 Sempron is right but Sockel 754 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=598614 when i watch all us compare´s trasher2 we found lot of fake´s or wrong result, but i think we need extra a person who watch our Results :ws: please fix this in Athlon XP Sempron 2600+ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
71proste Posted September 12, 2007 Share Posted September 12, 2007 but i think we need extra a person who watch our Results :ws: you'r right man:ws: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bwanasoft Posted September 12, 2007 Share Posted September 12, 2007 :D:D:D:D:D:D:D:D It´s fun only fun but fun must be real. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Genius_pt Posted September 12, 2007 Share Posted September 12, 2007 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=628544 - the score he claims (44s) does not correspond to the screenshot that tells 44,54s. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bwanasoft Posted September 12, 2007 Share Posted September 12, 2007 LOOOOOOOL http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=606318 Wrong CPU - XP 1500 have Multi 10 - CPU Screen ? and the Best It´s with a DigiCam Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Massman Posted September 12, 2007 Share Posted September 12, 2007 All needed screens are there. Weren't palomino unlockable? Edit: as it's my teammate, I'll ask him right now Edit2: it's a 2000+ palomino, Everest had troubles reading the cpu specifications . I'll fix his scores Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MaSell Posted September 12, 2007 Share Posted September 12, 2007 http://hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=562221 nedds more proof, link to orb don't work Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kal_garath Posted September 12, 2007 Share Posted September 12, 2007 nobody wants to correct these scores Could you please fix these results : http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=634844 - Screen show 516,136sec (8min36.136sec) but written result is : 5min16sec http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=632415 - Screen show 475.178sec (7min55,178sec) but written result is : 5min15sec and no CPU identification on the screen http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=632145 - Screen show 241.638sec (4min1.638sec) but written result is : 2min41sec http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=634877 - Screen show P4 630 s.775, but result in category Prescott 3GHz s.478 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=630012 - Screen show 11.921sec, but written result is : 11sec http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=633012 - Screen show 13029.311sec (3h37min9.310sec) but written result is : 1h30min29sec and no CPU identification http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=632417 - Screen show 7899.11sec (2h11min39.110sec) but written result is : 1h19min39sec http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=634703 - Screen show 2573.687sec (42min53.686sec), written result : 26min13sec and the result is under Prescott 3GHz s.478 instead of P4 630 s.775 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=631114 - Screen show 1842.172sec (30min42.172sec) but written result is : 18min42sec http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=634873 - Screen show P4 630 s.775, but result in category Prescott 3GHz s.478 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=632691 - Screen show 3min27.689sec (207.689sec) but written result is : 147.69sec http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=634871 - Screen show P4 630 s.775, but result in category Prescott 3GHz s.478 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=634842 - Screen show 616.79sec, but written result is 376sec http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=632124 - Screen show 453.36sec, but written result is 293sec http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=632086 - Screen show 244.98sec, but written result is 164sec http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=632985 - Screen show 229.45sec, but written result is 149sec http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=634854 - No CPU identification on the screen http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=641918 - No CPU identification on the screen http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=638218 - No CPU identification on the screen http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=641572 - No CPU identification on the screen http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=635731 - Is SetFSB enough to validate the CPU ? http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=634879 - Screen show P4 630 s.775, but result in category Prescott 3GHz s.478 Thx in advance Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bwanasoft Posted September 12, 2007 Share Posted September 12, 2007 All needed screens are there. Weren't palomino unlockable? Edit: as it's my teammate, I'll ask him right now Edit2: it's a 2000+ palomino, Everest had troubles reading the cpu specifications . I'll fix his scores he he he palomino are unlockable with L1 bridge but when i make it i write it in Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts