klopcha Posted August 16, 2007 Share Posted August 16, 2007 fixed Thank's http://hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=632688 Result on 2min 20 sec, not 1min 40 sec http://hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=577375 Result invalid http://hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=632993 Result 1 hours 14 min, not 45 min http://hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=577428 Result invalid Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Massman Posted August 16, 2007 Share Posted August 16, 2007 Thank's http://hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=632688 Result on 2min 20 sec, not 1min 40 sec http://hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=577375 Result invalid http://hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=632993 Result 1 hours 14 min, not 45 min http://hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=577428 Result invalid fixed Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
S_A_V Posted August 16, 2007 Share Posted August 16, 2007 Please check single 8600GT scores by blackwarriors62 (Syndrome-OC): http://hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=628928 http://hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=629640 It's impossible for unmodded card with only 770MHz on core. 12 (Russian Overs) already reported about this scores (see result history), but it still not blocked Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Just Learnin' Posted August 16, 2007 Share Posted August 16, 2007 Sorry for repeating myself: No CPU-Z in his CPU-Z screenshot, he hasn't got it in his SuperPi runs either, http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=559972 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=631540 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=559994 No screenshot for this fellow: http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=501281 Or this fellow: http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=506743 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Monstru Posted August 16, 2007 Share Posted August 16, 2007 Welcome back Massman, we are all happy now LE: This one is still there though... http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=634855 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Potapicus Posted August 17, 2007 Share Posted August 17, 2007 Pentium-3 850 MHz - http://www.hwbot.org/quickSearch.do?hardwareId=CPU_1016 category - WinPrime1024. 1st place - 1h 50min 17sec 660ms - Cydoo (Syndrome-OC) - compare url is http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=583869 there is no screenshot and no verification link - and the cheksum is INVALID: Verfication: checksum: A6F78CC0 (invalid) and by the way - this user has 4 results in WPrime 1024 - and 3 results has invalid checksum - and there is nothing else, what can confirm the truth of this results. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Monstru Posted August 17, 2007 Share Posted August 17, 2007 Same problem with same user, i can't understand why the results are still there.. http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=635601 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=634855 Titul - TopMods.net , no visible resolution in the screenshot, no fm link.... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Massman Posted August 17, 2007 Share Posted August 17, 2007 I'll fix them next monday, now I'm ready to leave for a lanparty Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Monstru Posted August 18, 2007 Share Posted August 18, 2007 Aaaaaah!! Good luck man, bring some nice clocks and Spi's from there Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gianni-gt Posted August 18, 2007 Share Posted August 18, 2007 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=615004 19min41sec (see screenshot) not 18min38sec!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest CHimeraVirus Posted August 18, 2007 Share Posted August 18, 2007 http://hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=634859 1h33min30sec (look@screenshot) not 56min10sec. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
steelrat Posted August 19, 2007 Share Posted August 19, 2007 I ask that you remedied these results, because screenshot of window it is not proof. you will compare registration of my results, and you see difference. http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=636501 http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=636499 http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=636496 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Potapicus Posted August 19, 2007 Share Posted August 19, 2007 Category - Pentium3 667 slot1 - http://www.hwbot.org/quickSearch.do?hardwareId=CPU_1456 All results of user inertiacreep (OutOfSpecs.Gr) are for processor with soc370. I asked Sadhiq to separate soc370 and slot1 - and what I have? some user, who post results 13/08 - put them into wrong category - and you know why? because there where no results - I edit my results right now. Please fix this wrong results! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest CHimeraVirus Posted August 19, 2007 Share Posted August 19, 2007 look at this guy http://hwbot.org/user.do?userId=9802 almost all scores from wprime (32 and 1024) r wrong write Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Crew Turrican Posted August 20, 2007 Crew Share Posted August 20, 2007 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=637197 well a p1 200 @ 788mhz? worng category i guess Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
pointhore Posted August 20, 2007 Share Posted August 20, 2007 No Screenshot or verification link http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=637186 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Potapicus Posted August 20, 2007 Share Posted August 20, 2007 It's me again. Please fix this: 1. Pentium-3 850 MHz - http://www.hwbot.org/quickSearch.do?hardwareId=CPU_1016 category - WinPrime1024. 1st place - 1h 50min 17sec 660ms - Cydoo (Syndrome-OC) - compare url is http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=583869 there is no screenshot and no verification link - and the cheksum is INVALID: Verfication: checksum: A6F78CC0 (invalid) and by the way - this user has 4 results in WPrime 1024 - and 3 results has invalid checksum - and there is nothing else, what can confirm the truth of this results. 2. Category - Pentium3 667 slot1 - http://www.hwbot.org/quickSearch.do?hardwareId=CPU_1456 All results of user inertiacreep (OutOfSpecs.Gr) are for processor with soc370. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Potapicus Posted August 20, 2007 Share Posted August 20, 2007 So, it's monday - but the situation is the same. Does somebody fix the wrong results, what I report? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
harleybro Posted August 21, 2007 Share Posted August 21, 2007 No link and in HOF: http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=635144 http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=637624 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Maxi Posted August 21, 2007 Share Posted August 21, 2007 Page 35/36 fixed - except for Chimera post #351 & potapicus post #354. No more time right now... BTW potapicus, invalid cheksums are not sufficient to block old scores, there was a problem with wPrime some time back and these results are OK. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Potapicus Posted August 21, 2007 Share Posted August 21, 2007 ok, forget about wprime - but wrong processor please fix... i'll be waiting for it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gprhellas Posted August 21, 2007 Share Posted August 21, 2007 The verification ORB link has been fixed in 3Dmark2003 with single card. Please release my score. Thanks gprhellas Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SF3D Posted August 21, 2007 Share Posted August 21, 2007 The verification ORB link has been fixed in 3Dmark2003 with single card.Please release my score. Thanks gprhellas It's fixed now. Thank you and congratulations about second place It's really nice score. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
S_A_V Posted August 21, 2007 Share Posted August 21, 2007 Please check all scores by P.A.S.S.A.T (Crazy-OC Germany) in 6800XT (NV42) cathegory: http://hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=636982 http://hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=636984 http://hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=636985 http://hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=636987 http://hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=636988 Looks like it 6800GT card flashed to 6800XT, because these scores are impossible for 8/4-pipelines videocard, but normal for 16/6 videocard. Clocks on P.A.S.S.A.T's screens only 425-450 for GPU and 1000-1200 for mem. My 6800XT/NV42 scores with 600/1400 clocks are much lover... No one of NV42-based cards can be unlocked and it always has 8/4 pipelines. There is only two ways to get 16/6 6800XT: GPU resoldering (removing NV42 and solder NV40) or simply BIOS-flash cheating. Page 35/36 fixed - except for Chimera post #351 & potapicus post #354. No more time right now... You missed this post: http://hwbot.org/forum/showpost.php?p=10770&postcount=340 last one in page 34. Don't forget to see when you'll have time for it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Crew Turrican Posted August 22, 2007 Crew Share Posted August 22, 2007 pentium 1 200 @ 788mhz http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=637495 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=637441 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts