Jump to content
HWBOT Community Forums

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 1.8k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

Posted

http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=642030

8800GTX card , not 9700 mobility class

(info even in description)

 

http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=504614

info from forum -> Powercolor 9500@9700, not 9700 mobility

 

http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=632606

looks like sli score, too high score for single 8600 gts with so low clocks and c2d 3,2GHz

 

http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=641832

fake or sli score , too low clocks/cpu speed for 11k+ on single card

Posted
http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=642030

8800GTX card , not 9700 mobility class

(info even in description)

 

http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=504614

info from forum -> Powercolor 9500@9700, not 9700 mobility

 

http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=632606

looks like sli score, too high score for single 8600 gts with so low clocks and c2d 3,2GHz

 

http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=641832

fake or sli score , too low clocks/cpu speed for 11k+ on single card

 

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=629820 - cheat, videocard is 1950PRo, seen on screen.

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=630628 - cheat, dont see videocard\cpu else.

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=629761 - cheat, special hidden resolution and name of videocard.

 

fixed

Posted

Could you please fix these results :

 

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=634844 - Screen show 516,136sec (8min36.136sec) but written result is : 5min16sec

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=632415 - Screen show 475.178sec (7min55,178sec) but written result is : 5min15sec and no CPU identification on the screen

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=632145 - Screen show 241.638sec (4min1.638sec) but written result is : 2min41sec

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=634877 - Screen show P4 630 s.775, but result in category Prescott 3GHz s.478

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=630012 - Screen show 11.921sec, but written result is : 11sec

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=633012 - Screen show 13029.311sec (3h37min9.310sec) but written result is : 1h30min29sec and no CPU identification

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=632417 - Screen show 7899.11sec (2h11min39.110sec) but written result is : 1h19min39sec

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=634703 - Screen show 2573.687sec (42min53.686sec), written result : 26min13sec and the result is under Prescott 3GHz s.478 instead of P4 630 s.775

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=631114 - Screen show 1842.172sec (30min42.172sec) but written result is : 18min42sec

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=634873 - Screen show P4 630 s.775, but result in category Prescott 3GHz s.478

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=632691 - Screen show 3min27.689sec (207.689sec) but written result is : 147.69sec

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=634871 - Screen show P4 630 s.775, but result in category Prescott 3GHz s.478

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=634842 - Screen show 616.79sec, but written result is 376sec

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=632124 - Screen show 453.36sec, but written result is 293sec

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=632086 - Screen show 244.98sec, but written result is 164sec

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=632985 - Screen show 229.45sec, but written result is 149sec

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=634854 - No CPU identification on the screen

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=641918 - No CPU identification on the screen

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=638218 - No CPU identification on the screen

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=641572 - No CPU identification on the screen

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=635731 - Is SetFSB enough to validate the CPU ?

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=634879 - Screen show P4 630 s.775, but result in category Prescott 3GHz s.478

 

Thx in advance ;)

Posted

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=547217 - It is 6600 GT because memory frequency is too high

 

http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=500616

 

http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=607995

 

http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=547069

 

http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=609478

 

Please chcek other results of this category because is some another results on 66GT in category 66 non-GT.

 

Regards,

Paul

Posted

Someone propably have report it as bad and it was blocked?.... coz it was

under moderation"..... :(

 

Have they seen what a Conroe can do with such high fsb and at 1:1....?..... :rolleyes:

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.

×
×
  • Create New...