harleybro Posted May 4, 2007 Posted May 4, 2007 Ok about the HT just haven't seen any others show as a dual core or two seperate cores. Also the bottom of the box show that the "missing libraries" wheren't installed. Just checking since I need to get a gauge of what scores I need when I throw mine back in the mobo.
redratamd Posted May 6, 2007 Posted May 6, 2007 http://hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=595298I think ,that's a fake ,because it's not the format likes Pi mod 1.5 with xp. And ,it's not possible to do a better time with a lower frequency of 600Mhz. It's not possible. Wait and see. it was run on linux.. blocked. http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=602609 Hi. That's the same thing,one more time with linux.
Massman Posted May 6, 2007 Posted May 6, 2007 http://hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=595298I think ,that's a fake ,because it's not the format likes Pi mod 1.5 with xp. And ,it's not possible to do a better time with a lower frequency of 600Mhz. It's not possible. Wait and see. it was run on linux.. blocked. http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=602609 Hi. That's the same thing,one more time with linux. blocked.
redratamd Posted May 6, 2007 Posted May 6, 2007 Thank's.Because it's easy to do this bench with linux.
Ginner Posted May 6, 2007 Posted May 6, 2007 found another one that was verified by a moderator.. a Q6600 wPrime run, as a E6600.. http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=602474
Massman Posted May 6, 2007 Posted May 6, 2007 found another one that was verified by a moderator.. a Q6600 wPrime run, as a E6600.. http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=602474 wPrime runs submitted via the site are automaticly verified if the checksum matches. I fixed the score.
Ginner Posted May 6, 2007 Posted May 6, 2007 as well as several other runs under E6700 are also QX6700. everyone in E6700 wPrime 32M under 17.xxx seconds are false(to be moved to right place)... http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=602648 (he got 2 QX6700 under E6700, anonymous) http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=601014 http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=602078 (as are all of his E6700 scores, AnRo) http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=595815 http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=598307 This one has no verification link, but compared to the other QX6700, it looks pretty similar, so i would guess it's also a QX6700 http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=596235
Nassuz Posted May 7, 2007 Posted May 7, 2007 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=590285 Hes got first place with a underclocked gfx? Sure this must be another gfx and not a X1950XT hes using, no link either, no sweat we know this guy is good:) Can someone look into this ....thanks
harleybro Posted May 7, 2007 Posted May 7, 2007 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=602514 Says in link 2x8800gts’s in the description but it's posted in single card area
Lanc Posted May 8, 2007 Posted May 8, 2007 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=601763 2x Radeon 9500 ? Transfer this result to single card, becouse this is unreal to have 2x 9500 on 1 mainboard ;]
Crew Turrican Posted May 13, 2007 Crew Posted May 13, 2007 hi guys here's a super pi results of a duron 1800 which is in the wrong categorie (athlon xp-m 1800+) http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=604359
klopcha Posted May 13, 2007 Posted May 13, 2007 Fake result: http://hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=603156'>http://hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=603156 (In 2.5 times exceeds a world record) http://hwbot.org/result.do?resultId Verification link - does not work and the user closes the name of a videocard in window 3D Mark
klopcha Posted May 13, 2007 Posted May 13, 2007 I apologize for the idle reference http://hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=603320 Verification link - does not work and the user closes the name of a videocard in window 3D Mark
klopcha Posted May 20, 2007 Posted May 20, 2007 I apologize for the idle reference http://hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=603320 Verification link - does not work and the user closes the name of a videocard in window 3D Mark Why you do not correct result? http://hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=606922 Result on Radeon 9600, but category is GeForce 3 Ti500.
redratamd Posted May 21, 2007 Posted May 21, 2007 http://valid.x86-secret.com/show_oc?id=178340 It's not good in the 3800+ core orleans am2. The cpu-z is maybe wrong. http://hwbot.org/quickSearch.do?hardwareId=CPU_1138
klopcha Posted May 23, 2007 Posted May 23, 2007 the other one with MX, doesn't see a reason why he would sheet that one, score is in line with other results;higher OC on card + higher OC on CPU Simply it would be desirable a good screenshot with the name of a videocard or working link ORB Fixed http://hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=545423 Result on Pentium 641, but category is Pentium 640. http://hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=539224 Similarly http://hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=503534 Similarly http://hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=573557 Result on Celeron 320 (90nm), but category is Celeron 2.4Ghz (0.13). http://hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=601222 No screenshot, no link http://hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=597062 No screenshot, no link
Massman Posted May 23, 2007 Posted May 23, 2007 http://valid.x86-secret.com/show_oc?id=178340 It's not good in the 3800+ core orleans am2. The cpu-z is maybe wrong. http://hwbot.org/quickSearch.do?hardwareId=CPU_1138 It's a Lima core, cpu-z bug.
Febril Posted May 23, 2007 Posted May 23, 2007 Hi.. There is 2 same categorie for intel pentium 2 celeron 500Mhz s370: http://www.hwbot.org/compareProcessorResult.do?resultId=592847#result http://www.hwbot.org/compareProcessorResult.do?resultId=605479#result
neoforce2007 Posted May 24, 2007 Posted May 24, 2007 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=552173 - card used in this test is not TC. So mismatch category.
klopcha Posted May 25, 2007 Posted May 25, 2007 http://hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=573283 User change default adjustments 3D Mark: Texture Format 16bit .
klopcha Posted May 25, 2007 Posted May 25, 2007 Fixedhttp://hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=545423 Result on Pentium 641, but category is Pentium 640. http://hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=539224 Similarly http://hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=503534 Similarly http://hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=573557 Result on Celeron 320 (90nm), but category is Celeron 2.4Ghz (0.13). http://hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=601222 No screenshot, no link http://hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=597062 No screenshot, no link Fixed please! http://hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=553150 The reference and screenshot are not loaded. http://hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=593958 The screenshot is not loaded.
Drager Posted May 26, 2007 Posted May 26, 2007 Global ranking For CPU-Z team OCX: doubled onepagebook`s result with x6800 (8th and 9th place). http://hwbot.org/listResults.do?applicationId=13&teamId=132&filterUser=true
Recommended Posts