Jump to content

Featured Replies

  • Replies 298
  • Views 34.7k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Most Popular Posts

  • Mutant_Tractor
    Mutant_Tractor

    I agree with steponz, Granted i am biased in that i have a Q3QP but I think at this stage it is just jealousy or regret from the people that bough Retail 980-X's and found them not to clock as well a

  • knopflerbruce
    knopflerbruce

    I wonder why there are so few AMD samples out there, and so many Intel's:D If Intel cared about this, you wouldn't find them on ebay, as the auctions would be removed. Intel knows about ebay, and if t

  • No, I paid a lot of money for these es cpus.

I was only looking at 5870's.. whoops.. good catch... Still I think Road Runner with his retail should be able to do that... Just needs LN2...

Is it legit ?

I for one can't trust OPB & coolaler anymore.

 

p.s. You do know that you can make an E.S. show up as a retail chip, don't ya ;)

Edited by BenchZowner

Why would I ever want to show people how to cheat CPU-z and other programs to show their ES as retail ?

I will never ever use or share a cheat or any kind of """""tweak"""""" that can be used to exploit benchmarks/overclocking.

If nobody manages to get a retail 980X ( on his own, not by somebody who knows someone who knows someone whose cousin works for Intel :P ) that benches Pi1M at 6.3-6.4GHz then I think we might have to exclude the ESs.

 

p.s. You do know that you can make an E.S. show up as a retail chip, don't ya ;)

 

How does this compute? How can you suggest to remove ES if there's a way to not show ES ...

Well, we all know who has benched at what freqs with Q3FEs & Q3QPs :P

Plus most of the well known at least benchers with those ESs don't do such things.

You're right, 'trust' and 'being in the know' have been proven to be rocksolid tools for detecting frauds.

Come on man, you're better than misunderstanding what I say.

I'm talking about the very few worthy people in the scene.

I wouldn't mention any names because I'd have to mention all of them, but as an example, I can guarantee you that SF3D would never publish a score obtained with an ES processor as if it was obtained with a retail CPU.

And you certainly know better than stating we can rely on 'knowledge' and 'trust' to take down frauds. There have been a number of examples where people 'trusted' and 'knew' someone wouldn't ruin the game and it happened anyway.

  • Crew

Knowing how to use a CPU-Z bug makes full price only if you're going to cheat and half of the price if not. What really is in price - knowledge about how to trace out the fraud result and even more - close a bug.

Might be not so easy as I'm figuring now. :)

If there is a hack of some sort, please pm it to Mass, to keep it out of the public eye.

 

So if the plan is to remove ES scores.. how are you going to judge the 3D scores without the validation screenshot?

 

When somemore people start getting retail 980x's this whole crying about es's will go away.

If there is a hack of some sort, please pm it to Mass, to keep it out of the public eye.

 

Not that I don't trust massman, but why should I show a "hack" to another person.

There are several ways to make an ES look like a retail CPU in every program.

 

So if the plan is to remove ES scores.. how are you going to judge the 3D scores without the validation screenshot?

 

First of all, if it was my decision to make, I would make having an online validation/score link ( ORB compare URL ) MANDATORY for every entry, not just the top 20.

 

Both validations and screenshots can be fiddled with and "cooked" to show whatever a clever ( I said clever, not smart and ethic ) person wants to.

 

When somemore people start getting retail 980x's this whole crying about es's will go away.

 

Yeah, the crazy retail I tried today was awesome and I stopped crying...

5790MHz max SuperPi 1M... coldbug at -156C... great CPU :D

ORB links for SuperPI or WPrime??? :)

 

Sure, why not :D

 

I was talking about the programs with a validation feature.

 

Although, that's a great idea.

We should create new versions of the benchmarks and have an online validation system integrated :)

If you can store 500 results in each benchmark with the free version, then it could be OK to always ask for a link. If not, then it's pretty useless - as they will be deleted fast. And nothing is more annoying than verification links that don't work ;)

Why would you ask Microsoft?

 

Bench... The coldbugs even on the Q3FE's are quite a pain especially with HT turned off.. I started out with a coldbug at -120 and with setting I have raised it to -150.. but now I am pretty much stuck... for 3D its a lot different... but the same as yours so far..

 

I think when you find a combo you will be surprised.

How many published links can you have per FM benchmark on ORB, if you have free or basic 3DM licence? I am asking because I have Advance/Pro licence, but still the number is limited if I remember corectly.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...