Eeky NoX Posted October 3, 2012 Posted October 3, 2012 Well said bro Keep up the good work Johnny!! Quote
Mehdi_FXX Posted October 3, 2012 Posted October 3, 2012 My God!!!6.9 and 10.26?!!!impossible! what happen if you run @ 6.95! congratulation johny;) Quote
Crew Leeghoofd Posted October 3, 2012 Crew Posted October 3, 2012 (edited) Oh Personal Best Edited October 3, 2012 by Leeghoofd Quote
Crew Leeghoofd Posted October 4, 2012 Crew Posted October 4, 2012 (edited) Spill the I-ram trick !!! Or was that for the worlds fastest PCmark run by CherV ? You benched together John ? teaching her the tricks Edited October 4, 2012 by Leeghoofd Quote
Guest John Lam Posted October 4, 2012 Posted October 4, 2012 PI-Fast tricks and tweaks were there... Â http://www.hwbot.org/forum/showthread.php?p=201236#post201236 Â Check the screenshot , some error happened in my hide mode... I will rebench it later. Quote
TaPaKaH Posted October 4, 2012 Posted October 4, 2012 (edited) You have uploaded at least two different screenshots to your 10.26s submission before selecting that it should be awarded no points. Here they are both still in hwbot database: http://img.hwbot.org/u41156/image_id_847393.png http://img.hwbot.org/u41156/image_id_847721.png On the first one, there is no space between "0.89" and ":" in the division time. Second one is even more badly messed, having "8.89" instead of "0.89", ~0.01 hours next to 10.26s and a letter "g" cut off by the "ASRock Timing configurator" icon. Â If this isn't photoshopping scores, then I don't know what is. Edited October 4, 2012 by TaPaKaH Quote
Christian Ney Posted October 4, 2012 Posted October 4, 2012 We are aware about the matter, it is under investigation. Quote
Guest John Lam Posted October 4, 2012 Posted October 4, 2012 @ Sam OCX Â Be Honestly , I feel sorry to everyone because I haven't double check my result. Â I have upload 2 screenshot because massman told me my screenshots have some problem and I upload the second one without checking. Â I can say this is unbelieveable, but MS Ramdrive is very buggy and the system become very unstable. Â This is the first time I tried this method and support will not have any problem with MS Native RamDrive , please forgive my careless. Â Sorry X 1000000 to everyone and this is not cheat Quote
Guest John Lam Posted October 4, 2012 Posted October 4, 2012 even the wprime 32m, I really afraid this is a fault run , so I want to make sure my tweaks and trim is work. Â So , Yesterday I make a test in 3960X Â before tweaks (3s) Â after tweaks (2.921s) Â this is my careless , even the wprime 32m result , you can see my careless style. Sorry T.T" Quote
TaPaKaH Posted October 4, 2012 Posted October 4, 2012 if you still have the exact OS you did PiFast(s) on - can you show any SuperPi calculation at any frequency with any level of optimisation? Quote
Schenckel bros Posted October 4, 2012 Posted October 4, 2012 this is not a result Cheated - John Lam work and study hard to get it, it was just an oversight on the screens of CPUZ Now tell me who never committed any negligence can not judge a person just because she committed an oversight There are many errors in the league world overclocking I mean that if Andre Yang - Shammy make a mistake like this they will be accused of cheating?? Is not that how we have to look at this situation let's have a bit of reasoning here he is only seeking new tweaks we will demonstrate respect for the work of this man Quote
Crew Leeghoofd Posted October 4, 2012 Crew Posted October 4, 2012 It's under evaluation by the staff, await there call. Â FYI there's nothing wrong with the CPUZ's by the way... other things look suspicious... Quote
Splave Posted October 4, 2012 Posted October 4, 2012 john lam if you get banned for a year can I have your chip please Quote
Guest battlecryawesome Posted October 5, 2012 Posted October 5, 2012 If you cheat at imaginary computer points you cant argue that your a douche. Quote
Guest John Lam Posted October 5, 2012 Posted October 5, 2012 john lam if you get banned for a year can I have your chip please  .... What Price ? Quote
zeneffect Posted October 5, 2012 Posted October 5, 2012 .... What Price ? Â marital rights to my sister? Quote
TaPaKaH Posted October 5, 2012 Posted October 5, 2012 If OS is indeed the same, then it is normally not possible to have xx.26 seconds as a PiFast time or subtime. Â Explanation: Normally, PiFast counts time in 1/64s of a second, same as SuperPi. 16/64s = .250s in SuperPi = .25s in PiFast 17/64s = .265/.266s in SuperPi = .27s in PiFast Try looking for 11.26, 12.26, 13.26, ... results in PiFast on hwbot and see how many of those were done using XP. Â The only way to have .26s on XP is by having OS messed up in a very specific way that both Pi and PiFast will not follow the "1/64s" rule. I remember Hicookie had something similar in Clarkdale times when his records were questioned (5.910s 1M on XP or something like this). From my own experience of nLiting hundreds of XP versions, this bug can emerge only during OS compilation and is permament. Now that you've shown via SuperPi that your OS doesn't have the bug, I have more ground to think that your 10.26s result(s) were bogus. Â To staff - I'd really hate to derail any tweaking thread, can the "offtopic" posts be moved somewhere else? For example, into the submission discussion thread. Quote
Aristidis Posted October 5, 2012 Posted October 5, 2012 You told us that TWCL setting is very important for PiFast and you have told the same about PCMark 05. The last think I want to hear is that is important for Wprime too. After many years of benching I believe that we now how to manage mem settings. Quote
GUN'G'STAR Posted October 5, 2012 Posted October 5, 2012 draw errors could affect result too and Sam OCX explanation made me believe that John's pifast submission can't be accepted. Quote
Aristidis Posted October 5, 2012 Posted October 5, 2012 Same steps are for Wprime too different for each OS and i'm not sure about 3.375 for WinXP. Results with X79 are normal but with 3770k? Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.