Jump to content
HWBOT Community Forums

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 376
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted

It seems like this Aquamark version (2.22) doesn`t work correctly with nVidia 9800 GTX+ card.

Tried different drivers (197.45 and 310.90) and OSes (Win7x64 and two versions of Win XP SP3 x86).

Aquamark runs correctly and shows the result, opens cpuz/gpuz, but after clicking on "Save result" button result is not saved in Aquamark3 Results folder. Please help.

 

Regular Aquamark 3 and old wrapper works fine.

Maybe it`s because card name contains slash or +: "NVIDIA GeForce 9800GTX/9800 GTX+"

Tried with 8600 GT under the same OSes and it works great.

Posted
It seems like this Aquamark version (2.22) doesn`t work correctly with nVidia 9800 GTX+ card.

Tried different drivers (197.45 and 310.90) and OSes (Win7x64 and two versions of Win XP SP3 x86).

Aquamark runs correctly and shows the result, opens cpuz/gpuz, but after clicking on "Save result" button result is not saved in Aquamark3 Results folder. Please help.

 

Regular Aquamark 3 and old wrapper works fine.

Maybe it`s because card name contains slash or +: "NVIDIA GeForce 9800GTX/9800 GTX+"

Tried with 8600 GT under the same OSes and it works great.

 

i have the same problem :(

Posted

Same problem with 2.23 (i downloaded the file 2.23 but the version says 2.22), it doesn't want to save result. Perhaps the version from the link (http://www.tiny.cc/hwbotaqua) will work.

 

I am getting annoyed running this. I have 84k+ in AM3 but cannot save it and I am running low on dry ice after two days.

Posted
Same problem with 2.23 (i downloaded the file 2.23 but the version says 2.22), it doesn't want to save result. Perhaps the version from the link (http://www.tiny.cc/hwbotaqua) will work.

 

I am getting annoyed running this. I have 84k+ in AM3 but cannot save it and I am running low on dry ice after two days.

 

So any results with 2.23 or 2.24?

Posted

With the help of ZL1 I've managed to identify the problem you guys were experiencing. Basically the system is missing the Visual C++ 2008 package so the encryption tool wasnt able to run.

 

I will integrate it in the next installer, meanwhile you can manually download them here:

 

32bit: https://dl.dropbox.com/u/10046731/Software/vcredist_x86.exe

64bit: https://dl.dropbox.com/u/10046731/Software/vcredist_x64.exe

Posted (edited)

2.22 also does not save :( Please add a button to save file manually (via Save as dialog).

 

EDIT: I ran out of dry ice yesterday, I am kindly asking moderators to add my result manually in the database.

 

am384069730-5105154.png

 

The setup is the same as here:

http://hwbot.org/submission/2354773_tiborrr_3dmark2001_se_geforce_fx_5900_xt_39037_marks

http://hwbot.org/submission/2354775_tiborrr_3dmark03_geforce_fx_5900_xt_10165_marks

http://hwbot.org/submission/2354777_tiborrr_3dmark05_geforce_fx_5900_xt_1928_marks

http://hwbot.org/submission/2354778_tiborrr_3dmark06_geforce_fx_5900_xt_614_marks

Edited by tiborrr
Posted

Seriously now, do people even read what I post. Last I checked I even PM'd you.

 

I just said it was fixed last NIGHT AT 3AM. It is not a fault with the wrapper but with a missing file from your Windows.

 

With the help of ZL1 I've managed to identify the problem you guys were experiencing. Basically the system is missing the Visual C++ 2008 package so the encryption tool wasnt able to run.

 

I will integrate it in the next installer, meanwhile you can manually download them here:

 

32bit: https://dl.dropbox.com/u/10046731/Software/vcredist_x86.exe

64bit: https://dl.dropbox.com/u/10046731/Software/vcredist_x64.exe

 

v2.25 also includes those C++ redis files. http://www.tiny.cc/hwbotaqua

Posted

I ran out of dry ice yesterday evening, see the time stamp on my results.

 

I am very disappointed by your attitude, really, you say like it's my fault the software you have published does not come with the necessary installation files while the software doesn't says there are any missing files, needed for proper operation.

 

I wish this was tested more thoroughly before it was released. My benching time is very scarce these days, I have a full-time job and am away from home during the week. I plan even the simplest benching sessions weeks in advance and these sort of events just piss me off.

Posted

Had a good bench session today with 2.24 without any real problems. Just a question..

I always save my results to a USB drive, incase the OS gets corrupt or condensation issues that force you to quit.. You name it.

Is it possible (just asking) that you can choose the save location? If you don't enter anything it just gets saved to desktop?

Posted (edited)
I ran out of dry ice yesterday evening, see the time stamp on my results.

 

I am very disappointed by your attitude, really, you say like it's my fault the software you have published does not come with the necessary installation files while the software doesn't says there are any missing files, needed for proper operation.

 

I wish this was tested more thoroughly before it was released. My benching time is very scarce these days, I have a full-time job and am away from home during the week. I plan even the simplest benching sessions weeks in advance and these sort of events just piss me off.

 

Sorry, but I got a little carried away as I wasted one night fixing a bug no one reported in the 2 months it was available as preview version. I understand your situation and I will help you get a datafile. I will PM you with further info soon.

 

Had a good bench session today with 2.24 without any real problems. Just a question..

I always save my results to a USB drive, incase the OS gets corrupt or condensation issues that force you to quit.. You name it.

Is it possible (just asking) that you can choose the save location? If you don't enter anything it just gets saved to desktop?

 

I guess I could add a dialog to ask where you want to save and keep F7 hotkey for desktop save. Thanks for suggestion.

Edited by GENiEBEN
Posted

GENiEBEN,

 

Great job on the wrapper.

 

One note: Subbed today http://hwbot.org/submission/2355457 but the wrapper did not recognise my 2500K. From what I saw it appears the "-" between i5-2500K caused the issue. Minor but had to go back in and edit after initial sub to insert CPU speed as it would not allow initially.

 

...PAQd

  • Crew
Posted

Gen This 2.23 ver run like a charm, all ok in Win 7 x64, only somthing strange in XP x86,

 

018848237038766.jpg

 

anyway i click on Yes and run properly, i dont know why happen with Xp x86 (Tiny eXperience)

 

Buen trabajo mi amigo !!

 

Good job my friend !!

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


×
×
  • Create New...