Hiwa Posted October 4, 2013 Posted October 4, 2013 you need tweak more and try higher memories. Quote
Shrekogre Posted October 4, 2013 Posted October 4, 2013 (edited) score is all wrong. mem to 2500 cl10 score still too low. not sure why. if i run 1169 gpu with higher bclk i can get better score. but still way too low. i already did 2200 pts on a 5800k on air. Edited October 4, 2013 by Shrekogre Quote
The Mutt Posted October 6, 2013 Posted October 6, 2013 How do you guys manage to run so high bclk/fsb? Any thing above 102 gives me BSOD... It might be me, I don´t have much experience with this setup. Quote
Ekky jengkol Posted October 6, 2013 Posted October 6, 2013 How do you guys manage to run so high bclk/fsb? Any thing above 102 gives me BSOD... It might be me, I don´t have much experience with this setup.  Try update your bios first mate Quote
I.nfraR.ed Posted October 6, 2013 Posted October 6, 2013 (edited) I have problems at 15001430+ GPU even with the tool from Stilt. FPS drops no matter what. Running Catalyst 13.9 on Win 7 x64. Â PS: I get normal scores only at "1169" multi, but my APU's IMC is bad, so I'm limited to 120 bclk Edited October 6, 2013 by I.nfraR.ed Quote
NickShih Posted October 7, 2013 Posted October 7, 2013 bios update  http://picx.xfastest.com/nickshih/bios/F288E6P130e.rar  added "APU TDP control option " disabled this one might help 3dmark benching   one more tips here .  please make sure the pwm is under well-cooling  using memory pot and keep it under -10~20 is the best way to bench 3D . Quote
Shrekogre Posted October 7, 2013 Posted October 7, 2013 I have problems at 15001430+ GPU even with the tool from Stilt. FPS drops no matter what.Running Catalyst 13.9 on Win 7 x64.  PS: I get normal scores only at "1169" multi, but my APU's IMC is bad, so I'm limited to 120 bclk  same deal with what i have. there seems to be a black hole from 121 to 127 bclk for me. 128 boots but not stable.  Running ide mode helps in bclk. although my ssd drop off after 105. i had to use a pcie 1x 2 port sata card for my ssd to run higher bclk. or running normal hdd helps too. Quote
I.nfraR.ed Posted October 7, 2013 Posted October 7, 2013 (edited) same deal with what i have. there seems to be a black hole from 121 to 127 bclk for me. 128 boots but not stable. Running ide mode helps in bclk. although my ssd drop off after 105. i had to use a pcie 1x 2 port sata card for my ssd to run higher bclk. or running normal hdd helps too.  No, I don't have problem with bclk. Running in IDE mode with my SSD I've tested up to 130.  Lower or higher divider (than 1169) for the IGPU results in lower fps when I try to match e.g. 1400MHz with the 1169 option. However with 1169 option and 3:32 mem divider max benchable is 1415Mhz for the GPU, because max stable mem frequency for this APU is 1290. Although I can load windows at say 1330 it is not benchable - crashes on desktop or reboots when I try to run 3dmark. Nothing helps - voltage, timings... I used ~1.7V (more was not needed) for the RAM, because it is the IMC failing. I gained a little on LN2, but not as much as I hoped.  I see top guys run the same multi, so I guess it's a common thing and I need a chip with better IMC.  On a side note - the board is rock stable. Bios recovers very well from bad settings and had absolutely no problem during the first sesion. Great job Asrock and Nick!  Also as Nick said - get a proper cooling for the pwm. Even after several hours at -190 for the cpu and -70 on the memory, the pwm heatsink was still warm and I had a fan placed over it.  BTW, thanks for the bios tip, that saved my @ss. I gues that block at the beginning is just a code for the bios flashing program. Flashed fine with Flashrom on Asus M4A89GTD. Edited October 7, 2013 by I.nfraR.ed Quote
Hiwa Posted October 7, 2013 Posted October 7, 2013 oh sorry i knew about the IDE but i forgot to mention here in my last post, Â not sure if the IMC stopped you, all CPUs ( 5 till now ) can run +1450 easy on gpu and +2666 on memories when right mem and temp and +1.9 Vdimm ( i can't suggest high vdimm as i heard its cpu killer) but honestly i tried always +1.9 and never lower with samsungs,CFR,BFR,PSC,BBSE Â the only thing i can tell you is trying that with the timings i posted in my last post, As nicky boy said when memories are lower than -50 i can't bench more than 1 hour, that means you have to know what you want to do exactly go -180 on cpu -100 memories boom run and save otherwise -20 is good enough for samsungs. Â some points: - If you have samsung go with them easiest memories to bench with Richaland ( 9-12-11-21 )then BFR and CFR( 9-11-10-25 but need -100) - Don't touch PSC/BBSE they are very hard to bench when over 2666 ( one run is enough to kill hazzan score ) - I found my screen corruption problem was loading OS at -185 or so , loading OS and run 3d at -165 everything is OK - If you have reboot or BSOD when Combined Test started, try -165 and not full pot - High CPU is not really needed(20/30 points), focus on memory first then NB over 29XX, best way is leave easy CPU and NB find the best memory timings and frequency bench whole the 3D ( someone run only GTs, someone run only GT3,GT4) NO you have to run WHOLE the benchmark. after you find best combination then go higher NB and then CPU, Â i thought NB freq and memory freq should be match but it is not with my tests, you can have low NB but high stable memory. Â Hope i can help you guys. Quote
Hazzan Posted October 7, 2013 Posted October 7, 2013 - Don't touch PSC/BBSE they are very hard to bench when over 2666 ( one run is enough to kill hazzan score ) . Â just lucky not from my skill bro.....ho ho ho ho Quote
Hiwa Posted October 7, 2013 Posted October 7, 2013 just lucky not from my skill bro.....ho ho ho ho  not true , you don't have only nice BFR ( what i should better than yours lol ) but you know how to manage this shift all together to have+3k score bro. Quote
Shrekogre Posted October 7, 2013 Posted October 7, 2013 No, I don't have problem with bclk. Running in IDE mode with my SSD I've tested up to 130. Lower or higher divider (than 1169) for the IGPU results in lower fps when I try to match e.g. 1400MHz with the 1169 option. However with 1169 option and 3:32 mem divider max benchable is 1415Mhz for the GPU, because max stable mem frequency for this APU is 1290. Although I can load windows at say 1330 it is not benchable - crashes on desktop or reboots when I try to run 3dmark. Nothing helps - voltage, timings... I used ~1.7V (more was not needed) for the RAM, because it is the IMC failing. I gained a little on LN2, but not as much as I hoped.  I see top guys run the same multi, so I guess it's a common thing and I need a chip with better IMC.  On a side note - the board is rock stable. Bios recovers very well from bad settings and had absolutely no problem during the first sesion. Great job Asrock and Nick!  Also as Nick said - get a proper cooling for the pwm. Even after several hours at -190 for the cpu and -70 on the memory, the pwm heatsink was still warm and I had a fan placed over it.  BTW, thanks for the bios tip, that saved my @ss. I gues that block at the beginning is just a code for the bios flashing program. Flashed fine with Flashrom on Asus M4A89GTD.  my score gets higher when i start low until 1169. after that it is downhill all the way.  guess my ssd doesn't like the high bclk.  and yeah i was pulling my hair on the bios corrupt. i was darn happy when i could save mine. glad u can save yours too. Quote
I.nfraR.ed Posted October 7, 2013 Posted October 7, 2013 (edited) oh sorry i knew about the IDE but i forgot to mention here in my last post,  not sure if the IMC stopped you, all CPUs ( 5 till now ) can run +1450 easy on gpu and +2666 on memories when right mem and temp and +1.9 Vdimm ( i can't suggest high vdimm as i heard its cpu killer) but honestly i tried always +1.9 and never lower with samsungs,CFR,BFR,PSC,BBSE  the only thing i can tell you is trying that with the timings i posted in my last post, As nicky boy said when memories are lower than -50 i can't bench more than 1 hour, that means you have to know what you want to do exactly go -180 on cpu -100 memories boom run and save otherwise -20 is good enough for samsungs.  some points: - If you have samsung go with them easiest memories to bench with Richaland ( 9-12-11-21 )then BFR and CFR( 9-11-10-25 but need -100) - Don't touch PSC/BBSE they are very hard to bench when over 2666 ( one run is enough to kill hazzan score ) - I found my screen corruption problem was loading OS at -185 or so , loading OS and run 3d at -165 everything is OK - If you have reboot or BSOD when Combined Test started, try -165 and not full pot - High CPU is not really needed(20/30 points), focus on memory first then NB over 29XX, best way is leave easy CPU and NB find the best memory timings and frequency bench whole the 3D ( someone run only GTs, someone run only GT3,GT4) NO you have to run WHOLE the benchmark. after you find best combination then go higher NB and then CPU,  i thought NB freq and memory freq should be match but it is not with my tests, you can have low NB but high stable memory.  Hope i can help you guys.  All points are valid with some exceptions for me - I don't have anything different than BBSE/PSC/Hyper. I've used PSC. I have Adata 1600 BFR that are capable of high frequency, but they do not boot at all. Not stable with PSC/BBSE over 2600 at any timings. About 2550 was max on air and I've tried 3 kits good for 2600+ very tight subs (on intel though). Actually I have Geil Evo Veloce 2400 from one of the competitions, but I've borrowed them to a friend for some test. Have to get them back. - Loading OS at full pot was never a problem with my APU/MEM/Board. Also benched several hours with mem at -70, but I started with higher temp and there was no difference. - High CPU is not needed, unless you're fighting for the last 20-30 points  Some observations from me: - about 1.74V VDIMM was max for me. Anything higher and it was getting worse, no matter the temperature of the APU/memory. I settled with 1.7V. - IGPU didn't like more than ~1.5V. Maybe that saved me from killing it  Unfortunately I don't have another APU to compare, however I have no choice but get another one this week. Edited October 7, 2013 by I.nfraR.ed Quote
The Mutt Posted October 7, 2013 Posted October 7, 2013 Try update your bios first mate  Yeah yeah, I know and I have and I will test more to night. :-) Quote
Hiwa Posted October 7, 2013 Posted October 7, 2013 forget comparing intel with amd on memories, same PSC/BBSE i can do easy AIR 2666 8-12-8 1.85 on intel i can't do the same even under LN2 here. as i said over 2666/2700 till 2600 i can bench easy 7-10-7 with both bbse and psc, had a run 7-9-7 with bbse thought, temp was very very important when i benched them higher than -100 they won't pass 3d. High CPU for needed for testing , when you have final run you have to go over6g to get the last 20/30 points for sure my meant was playing with mem first witch can give you over 200 pts then go with cpu Quote
I.nfraR.ed Posted October 7, 2013 Posted October 7, 2013 (edited) I can't go so low on the mems with my "pot", so I'm safe . I know that mem clock can't be compared across platforms, but expect them to run 2600+ on slack timings. Getting the Veloce tonight, so I will check again. Can do 2600 easy. On this platform 1200 7-10-7 was impossible on air, had to set 8-10-8/8-11-8. As you can see from my sub I haven't pushed the cpu hard yet. I was mainly playing with mem and gpu, but had a benching wall at 1290MHz for the memory no matter which divider I was using. Â Anyway, it was just the first test..I'm more than 1 week behind you guys, due to the bios update failure. Â Edit: Just tested with 2x8 Geil Veloce 2400C11 and I can load Windows at 2600, but it's unstable just like with PSC, no way I can run 3d. 2570 XMP is fine for full 3dmark run, while 2600 even with a lot slacker timings just barely loads windows. Pretty sure it's the IMC. Edit2: Absolutely the same with Adata 1600G (BFR). Edited October 7, 2013 by I.nfraR.ed Quote
steponz Posted October 8, 2013 Posted October 8, 2013 Geesh, bought a brand new asrock board with brand new 6800 chip.. made the mistake of putting Vaseline in the board and of course no read out on the post screen. Seriously, a first for me... so much for this comp for me.. Quote
Splave Posted October 8, 2013 Posted October 8, 2013 this is all I got, all chips are dead now which is that nature of AMD. Goodluck guys! Keep pushing. Quote
ryba AICooling Posted October 8, 2013 Posted October 8, 2013 this is all I got, all chips are dead now which is that nature of AMD. Goodluck guys! Keep pushing. Â hahaha, what? I tested... a LOT cpu from A64 era and dead was maybe 3-5 cpus :nana: Quote
Splave Posted October 8, 2013 Posted October 8, 2013 Seems as though if you push over 1.9 on these 6800k they will finish the session and then be dead when you try them again on air Quote
I.nfraR.ed Posted October 8, 2013 Posted October 8, 2013 APU is a different animal and I have almost no experience with them. However seems more fragile than Bulldozer/Vishera. On the other hand Deneb was like a tank and withstands a heavy torture. So you can't generalize like that Quote
Shrekogre Posted October 8, 2013 Posted October 8, 2013 i killed 1 on 1.6v vcore and 1.65v nb. now i get distortion in even in post. Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.