Crew Leeghoofd Posted December 13, 2013 Crew Posted December 13, 2013 Sorry mate but this is not gonna happen at 4Ghz under Win7/8, your score is reported Quote
Crew Leeghoofd Posted December 13, 2013 Author Crew Posted December 13, 2013 I've already had to mess with subtimings and co to go sub 8 mins... this would be too much if I need to slacken timings to get a faster score... Quote
GENiEBEN Posted December 13, 2013 Posted December 13, 2013 I've already had to mess with subtimings and co to go sub 8 mins... this would be too much if I need to slacken timings to get a faster score... You're doing it wrong Quote
Crew Leeghoofd Posted December 13, 2013 Author Crew Posted December 13, 2013 And now you tell me, darn Quote
der8auer Posted December 13, 2013 Posted December 13, 2013 blocked & banned. There's no room for cheaters here. Quote
varachio Posted December 15, 2013 Posted December 15, 2013 (edited) After many tests I made recently, I managed a nice score of 7.35.802 under win7 64bit ultimate with normal spi32m tweaks like CW. With exactly same settings I managed 7.26.656 and this is the score I submit to CC2013. I cannot access KIMON_MA score to check. I get an error. But only because he is using win7 and he has a good score is not a reason to be banned or cheat. I attach my above mentioned score in win7 fyi. If this is not only the case and I loose something else bigger here I apologize. Just I don't want a team mate to be banned just for a suspicion. Edited December 15, 2013 by varachio Quote
Crew Don_Dan Posted December 15, 2013 Crew Posted December 15, 2013 You're running Haswell + memory at 1128.0 8-10-8 on Win 7 64bit, he is running Sandy Bridge-E + memory at 1093.2 9-11-10 on Win 8 64bit yet he manages to get a score only 15 seconds slower than your best score. Quote
Administrators websmile Posted December 15, 2013 Administrators Posted December 15, 2013 @varachio I saw the score, at the settings and the OS used it was faster than normal Ivy bridge with mems on LN2 and around 10 seconds faster than fastet Ivy-Bridge E Submission which used mem settings of 1470 c9- SB-E is slower per MHz than both Ivy and IVy-E and far slowe than haswell,sad to say this, but the score wasn´t possible technically, seeing the loops it was obvious that the run was made at much hogher cpu-frequency than 4ghz.... Quote
varachio Posted December 15, 2013 Posted December 15, 2013 (edited) ΟΚ. I' m sure the score double cross checked before submission removal. As I said I cannot access submission due to an unknown error. Thanks for the quick reply and attention to this. Edited December 15, 2013 by varachio Quote
Crew Don_Dan Posted December 15, 2013 Crew Posted December 15, 2013 Here's the submitted screenshot: Quote
l0ud_sil3nc3 Posted December 16, 2013 Posted December 16, 2013 I have all ready reported two users with 2011 times that were not possible Varachio, and believe me that time is not possible with said os, timings, clocks. . . Quote
Splave Posted December 16, 2013 Posted December 16, 2013 not a mistake either, must think we are pretty stupid to submit that... Quote
der8auer Posted December 16, 2013 Posted December 16, 2013 After many tests I made recently, I managed a nice score of 7.35.802 under win7 64bit ultimate with normal spi32m tweaks like CW.With exactly same settings I managed 7.26.656 and this is the score I submit to CC2013. I cannot access KIMON_MA score to check. I get an error. But only because he is using win7 and he has a good score is not a reason to be banned or cheat. I attach my above mentioned score in win7 fyi. If this is not only the case and I loose something else bigger here I apologize. Just I don't want a team mate to be banned just for a suspicion. He only got a 4 weeks ban like the rest of the efficiency-super-heros. No worries. Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.