Submission & member moderation

Can I point out this result to you http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=762014 It's not appearing in my account http://www.hwbot.org/user.do?userId=17693 Looking at our team it shows 6 members only 4 registered, http://www.hwbot.org/teamInfo.do?teamId=2006 I know of only 4 people who have submitted can you help out please. who ntrance

i have a problem and i like that moderator klopcha leaves me alone !!! he already blocked 17+ benches today alone. This is not normal anymore! there where benches of 1 year ago, that stands good for a year. I post a new bench score, and 5min later he blocks it again! This is not good for the moral. I ask other moderators what the problem was and he stil keeps blocked scores, i lost with his fun on my profile 17+ benches and +-20points en cups. I like that this problem with klopcha can be solved. greetings a bench addict chiller

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=700501 Why on earth would someone delete my half an year old result? Just because it's way better than yours? BTW: YOU CANNOT CHANGE THE RESOLUTION IN FREE VERSION OF 3DMARK03. LEARN YOUR BUSSINESS FIRST YOU TRIGGERHAPPY MOD DEMIURG! Unblock it ASAP!

Hello guys, Please, look at these results: they are from the one account, but all have global points: "3dmark06 multiple card" results: http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=769759 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=717120 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=702275 "3dmark 2005 multiple card" results: http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=771184 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=702276 This account also have global points from two super PI results and two super PI 32M results: http://www.hwbot.org/user.do?userId=11827 How is this possible? Thank you.

So I have an old 486dx chip that can run win95 at best. I can run superpi and chkcpu. CPUZ is a no go according to Franck@x86. What can I submit for this chip?

I've got a pretty good result of CPU frequency (going to be first), but validated it using CPU-Z version 1.46 instead of 1.47. CPU-Z validator tells that validation file is correct, but doesn't want to publish it because of inconveniet version. I have no possibility to repeat my record, so I wonder if there is any chance to submit my result? I can give you a validation file if it's necessary. Sorry for poor English.

Hello, I was just wondering what's wrong with my highest 3DMark05 2900 PRO submission that makes it not valid for ranking? There's alot of info in the screen shot and I don't think there is anything important being blocked and on top of that there are other submission's in the same category that have less info but are valid. Hopefully someone can help me out and point out whats wrong. Thanks, David EDIT, Here is a link to the submission I am talking about, http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=683739

I reported some of Ze do Bench's scores mostly because the submissions are all sub-par but also because they are quite sketchy as well. If it's true we can make submissions like this with no screens then I suppose I should gain a few more easy points. If I made submissions that looked that sloppy, not only would I feel bad, I'd expect to be laffed off every forum ever known A couple of them have since been moderated but omg how can scores and submissions like these pass? Here's one example http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=726152 Nice run? I can get that too if I run 1024x768 Maybe some of his other scores that passed could use more of a look too?

Please explain, why was this result checked and not deleted or moved? http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=764710 Two 6600GT in SLI in single category.

Hey guys. Just registered. Validated my old scores, and working on better ones with newer hardware. But I couldn't help but notice there was a bit of a mistake with one of my scores: http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=552156 Point is, that's not a Sempron. As you can see, I've mentioned it's an Athlon64 3000+ Venice core on socket 754 (they were only sold for a very limited period, true, but they existed). I wouldn't think it would be fair to the other guys who used Semprons to have the score listed on the ranking dedicated to that model of Sempron. If anyone can do something about it (move it to it's rightful place), please do so.

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=599918 This is a barton xp, in the Sempron 2800+ 754 category The result is moderated...it is strange

Hi, can you add this graphics card please and move my results into it once it's created please? 01 - http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=756175 03 - http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=756176 05 - http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=756177 06 - http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=756178 AM - http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=756179 Also, there's a Geforce Go 6150 category, but there are two versions. One with 2 ROP's, and mine with 1 ROP (lol ). I have submitted to the category along with the 2 ROP cards, but can another category be created for my Go 6150? 01 - http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=756193 03 - http://www.hwbot.org/…

For some reason I dont have the option of deleting these two results from my collection: http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=634322 http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=605603 Iv improved on these scores, so dont need the old ones. If a mod could delete them, id appreciate it. Cheers! K

Hi, in the last few days i've submitted a few 7900GS results in three different categories (01SE, 05 & AM3), but only recieved points for 01SE which gave me a boost to ~ 471 points. I've also submitted 05 & AM3 results yesterday and also an improved 01SE run, but still at ~ 471 points while i should be at around ~ 495 since i recieved another 14.8 + 8.7 for AM3 & 05. http://hwbot.org/user.do?userId=7258 I've noticed similiar problem in the past. I solved it with deleting and re-posting the results, but this time it doesn't work. Please attend to it. Thanks! Greets, N.

simple questions i think what is the average time that a reported entry takes to be seen (and corrected or blocked if necessary) by the hwbot staff ? - i'm asking this because i reported an entry 3 or 4 days ago and until now nothing happened so i want to know how much time i have to wait until the false result is blocked or corrected somehow.

Hello guys, I'm seriously disappointed here, I see that my result have been blocked: http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=761996. I've been working 4 hours straight for this result and this is what I get? ~21K not possible with nicely clocked 260GTX and 4.4Ghz quad, tRD 6, and DRR +1200? I don't even bother to use lod or midmap to get hose scores. If I had a 3DMark06 license I would have a verification link. I swear this was ran at 1280x1024, I did not cover it for purpose I just did not knew that it mattered. If somebody can put that score back I would appreciate it greatly. You can find me at XS or OCXtreme forums. It's just very dissapointing when you put so much e…

Can someone tell me why one of my 06 scores has disappeared from my account? Im talking about this one: http://service.futuremark.com/compare?3dm06=7752217

I don't understand why no one in rank have the "x86-secret url validation", but it is needed to post a result at this moment.... I got a screen with 1995mhz with the x86-secret validation, and a screen with 2191,9 mhz with only simple cpu-z interface and i can post only the first..... but the first places of the rank have not the x86 secret validation... all is regular? thx

we have a problem, yesterday we benched with two blackops and 2 p4 cedar mill 631, one mine and one of my friend own. we had also 3 pair of ddr3 sticks, ocz,diablo, kingston. with first p4 we did 7600mhz and with second 7200, we hosted the result but someone ban my result of 7200.... i wanna know why, i can post a pitch of ur 2 blackops and ur 2 p4 and ur 3 sticks of differents ram. waiting for answer. best regards

Hy, Today I saw that all results of my E7200 were selected for an E7300. After that I wanted to correct it,but there is no E7200 in the System. greats Frank

Hi guys, I saw this thread over on XS.. http://www.xtremesystems.org/forums/showthread.php?t=194733 I have no problem with SF3D, I love his benches but on reading the thread it admits that they only had one chip and Neoforce also borrowed it and submitted the 2D benches that he did. Isn't that a bit naughty, surely only SF3D could do that.? I have no problem with the 3D benches if that was his card though. Regards, Dave.

hey why somebody delete my 3d mark 01 score: i can*t see anything wrong on the screen and compare url... http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=761133 mfg MAFRI

Benchtec have a group score login. All the results are legit- the scores came/come from sponsored hardware or group bench sessions. We have new scores from I34, but im reluctant to allow them to be posted because a group score login is apparently a gray area? HWB staff and any HWB member are welcome to look through BenchTec Group Score results- you wont find any discrepencies- we're not out to con folk. After some of the recent divided opinions about individuals submitting scores from group events, I would have thought a group title would be a good idea? I really think its the best (if not ONLY good) way to upload results in some situations. Please can we have…

Hi, please add T2390 http://valid.x86-secret.com/show_oc.php?id=399873 SiS Mirage 3 (351)

Please add GMA i945G to database , its not available in database and it keeps saying unrecognized GPU? Motherboard - Pc Chips P17G/1333 , i945G + ich7 chipset.