BeepBeep2

Does this happen with older drivers and flip queue = 0? 12.11 seems a bit special to me, scores jump way high compared to old drivers, like 15% without any tweaks outside CCC...wonder what they did to get the extra FPS?

... Photoshop can fk 01, 03, 05, 06, Vantage, 11 up...can fk wprime up since we don't validate through wP 1.55 anymore... We don't check/require valid SuperPi checksums either (they aren't checked by the submission system) so people could easily get away with that assuming some of us aren't prowling every sub to find a rotten score. Unfortunately there will be douchebags, it's up to us to catch them, if you think we need a wrapper for every damned benchmark we run now...eventually they will just figure out how to cheat the wrapper too

The BFG Thermonotelligence?

Haha, you guys are hilarious I love this thread. I read it at school when I'm bored of networking simulations

Interesting... I see what you mean. Like, I have the highest score for 3DMark03 and 2x HD 5770, not worth as many points as single card, but I got it because of my efficiency, not brute force and I am proud of it. Other things though, I may have a cup for or something but I don't feel like it matters, because there are like...4 other results. I wish HWBOT ranked results by efficiency too, not just "first one there"...like for CPU benches, if lowest CPU clock with tied score gets highest rank for ties?

Just use colder water and you'll have another

Noice

^+1... That sucks

Thank you

Still listed as "Staff" on HKEPC from what I can see.

Thanks, little comp between myself, DOM. and the OC Forums guys

I spent 10L LN2 and a whole night for nothing...shoulda known when IMC did exact same clocks for DDR3 Freq too... 7374 MHz already submitted, this one did a whole 7375, and then the valid was corrupt.

Howdy chispy

Oh yeah?

I wish I had a 4850 like that, lol. Stock vRAM, ASUS TOP has Qimonda and only does ~1100, I never tested with higher voltage but I doubt it would do 1200 regardless. I'm stuck with what I've got though, maybe I'll sell and someday find another, but doubt it.

AIB - CardExpert Technology? Gainward stock bios? Your GDDR3 clocks are amazing btw.

Okay, thanks On top of banning/investigating these specific accounts, will there be any further investigation? Just the idea of it all is sketchy, I'm not blaming or accusing any real person of doing anything but I do wonder why such things happened the way they did in regards to these accounts, the contest and the obvious knowledge of the people that participated using said accounts...

You tried the legacy thing too? When UEFI came out first I remember talk about trouble with XP / UEFI... Tried every SATA port? If you are having major troubles, maybe you can get a very cheap/bootable PCI-E raid card to try?

Not sure if HWBOT staff just takes many days to make decisions, or is really trying to protect innocence here... Quite possibly hardware pics are a mistake, and that they are different machines, but screens show same OS in a few cases, the other two are related obviously to guy who shopped 01 score without calculator, etc... Like Sam said, looks way too obvious...looks more than John Lam obvious... EDIT: On top of this, I have my own personal suspicions they are not even real people... There are many possibilities too brewing in my head...keep in mind these are not accusations but more "what ifs"... That these are alias accounts for other people... Or maybe ASRock needed people to cheat so the people made new accounts knowing they might get caught... ASRock needed competition filler and these accounts don't mean anything outside the one competition... Etc. etc. These people (person?) have all the hardware and skills necessary to bench competitively, even do little things like tape up board, eraser, stuff insulation...they have a set way of doing things, but the accounts were formed at competition start. I know if I made a new alias account, and people recognized my house from my other pics, or the way I insulate, my fans, hardware, bench place, etc I would be in a lot of trouble...

Marc, showing PiFast 1/64th second / XP "rule", J. Lam violated, plus screens that are obviously screwed up with PiFast, division time issue and not lined up numbers/letters, chopped off letters etc... Why did he have to change screenshot for exact same score/submission 3 times before he was happy, etc... I think he didn't pay enough attention to photoshop, and realized that the community is not as stupid as he initially thought, or maybe he wasn't as sly as he thought... Either way, he should have taken liberty to remove suspicious score he could not prove, or at very least run again and prove it with solid info. He felt he could do otherwise so he's gone now...

Nice stuff Nature is really strong...03 is a PITA between LOD and what each test needs lol...

Those load temps? My idle temps were mid 60s, load low 80s... Shoulda bought one Got a riser cable instead, apparently won't be here until the 18th.

No wonder I drop a position! Will get ya back soon enough, trans_am sending me GPU pot

Cut one off, lol