Strunkenbold

nice score here, though you need a combination of CPU-Z processor and memory tab for valid submission. Also which cpu is this actually? As a c3 677Mhz Nehemiah probably only exists on hwbot. More complete list here: http://www.pc-atrium.de/html/viac3.html

You actually just have to fix the bug that everyone can submit with everything in the pentium II stage

on single cores very efficient: start /high /b

What sense would a wrapper have? How will the staff get rid of the bugged runs which are already in the db? And dont compare this bench to PCM05. PCM05 isnt based on coincidence like UC...

Started discussion over one year ago... http://forum.hwbot.org/showthread.php?t=59847&page=4 But just didnt got much attention...

Looks like well tweaked. Good job on this.

From what I saw, for me win7 64bit with 64bit JRE was always a little bit faster. But never tested on Penryns so situation might differ.

Simply, HWBot prime doesn't use HT at all.

Why not using win7 64bit or is this winxp 64bit?

For me, running HWbot Prime is faster on 2nd run and then drops on 3rd while it is fastest on 4th or 5th run. I tried between different systems but behavior was almost the same everytime across them. UCBench is like running a specific combination of threads. Running i.e. 64 threads alone doesnt achieve the same results. Especially on single cores there seems to be a trick getting a ridicules high result which looks very bugged.

Looks really spectacular. Brute force! Anyway I was able to unlock palominos on NF2 boards too. And I think others were able to do this too. So bridge mods could really work. On the other hand this could also be just a creative way to make things look legit.

This might be something for you. Your wrapper says HD4600, but Im pretty sure its done with his GTX770. Seems like detection needs a little fine tuning.

Benching done right! Very good!

Very good efficiency for this frequency. Wonder if you can reproduce this again and again or if its just one lucky run?

Seems like they released a fix for that today: I really hope that this is the solution...

Thx Mr. Ney. Though I must say this is just pure luck on the cpu.

That thread is huge... Took some time I think Smaller thread for Meroms

Some yonah WRs.

There is currently no i5 3340 category on HWBot, therefore user didnt even had a chance submitting it right. 3340M is 2C4T 3340 is 4C4T

Very nice, I bought one adapter too but couldnt get it to run on my P5E3 Deluxe nor on my DFI P45 T3RS. Seems like DDR3 is little bit of an overkill for this s478 cpu's.

The right category would be: http://hwbot.org/hardware/videocard/mobile_hd_graphics_4000/ GPU-Z doesnt do us the favor and do right detection here.

Its again, playing lottery on this buggy bench. Simply click on all threads and available instructions. Bench will take ages on single core but you can be sure you get atleast one crazy score that stands out of the rest.

The try failed?

Just tought you may do some fancy stuff to overcome the limitations of your display. Actually the vantage section had to be cleaned as well as whoever cant run 3D06 in default resolution has the same problem with vantage too.

Not ran at default resolution or do I miss something?