-
Posts
3674 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Days Won
31
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Events
Blogs
Everything posted by TaPaKaH
-
OGS - Core i9 11900KF @ 7044MHz - 3min 40sec 907ms SuperPi - 32M
TaPaKaH replied to shar00750's topic in Result Discussions
Drop down and give me 3min37, private ! -
G.Skill date codes and PSC X vs. T/R series?
TaPaKaH replied to nnimrod's topic in Memory Heaven (air/extreme)
The switch happened only on kits whose specs allowed for it. As much as G.Skill would like to use cheaper ICs on, say, 2400C8 PI, there simply aren't any alternatives out there. It's not impossible to find 1600C7 with X-series that are new, but chances are those won't be good. Normally most 2200 9-9-9 kits are BBSE, but from the seventh digit of the bottom marking, I see it's a "C" or a "D", indicating Elpida BCxx (which officially never existed) or BDBG/BDSE. -
DDC - SDR SDRAM @ 250.7MHz - 250.7 MHz Memory Frequency
TaPaKaH replied to GRIFF's topic in Result Discussions
You managed to get global points with SDRAM in 2021, haha :D -
TAGG - Core 2 Duo E7200 @ 5841MHz - 8sec 640ms SuperPi - 1M
TaPaKaH replied to Obijuan83's topic in Result Discussions
Another one bites the dust -
TaPaKaH - GeForce 7800 GT @ 750/680MHz - 29048 marks 3DMark03
TaPaKaH replied to kim55's topic in Result Discussions
Yes. All of my 3D are with stock VRM -
That's been some looong sleep, padre
-
@ground: Still waiting for 300 BCLK X58
-
wytiwx - Core 2 Duo E6300 @ 4939MHz - 4938.95 mhz CPU Frequency
TaPaKaH replied to Eisbaer798's topic in Result Discussions
Northwood style I've only seen Wolfdale-6M chips on E5200 and E7200 and heard about Celeron E3200/E3300. Not sure if other models ever even existed. -
wytiwx - Core 2 Duo E6300 @ 4939MHz - 4938.95 mhz CPU Frequency
TaPaKaH replied to Eisbaer798's topic in Result Discussions
For E5x00/E7x00 you need PLL under the default 1.5V, which only Gigabyte P45 and PLL-modded boards can set. Without PLL mod, the current #1 E5200 stops at 390 air, 480 LN2. Also, you can immediately discard Wolfdale-3M derived ones (96-98%) and focus on Wolfdale-6M ones. You can distinguish these physically. I've tried around 100+ of the latter, which would yield same results as 2000-4000 random ones. -
wytiwx - Core 2 Duo E6300 @ 4939MHz - 4938.95 mhz CPU Frequency
TaPaKaH replied to Eisbaer798's topic in Result Discussions
This is still very lucky I tried 1500-2000 pcs E2140, E2160, E2180 and my best chip did 565 LN2. -
wytiwx - Core 2 Duo E6300 @ 4939MHz - 4938.95 mhz CPU Frequency
TaPaKaH replied to Eisbaer798's topic in Result Discussions
Your luck is absurd. I tried about 3000 (of E6300, E6400, E6750) and found only three that would barely do 600 on air. Nowhere near 615. -
wytiwx - Core 2 Duo E6300 @ 4939MHz - 4938.95 mhz CPU Frequency
TaPaKaH replied to Eisbaer798's topic in Result Discussions
How many E6300 did you try? -
Are these any good in 32M? Are these single- or dual-ranked sticks?
-
wytiwx - GA-EP45T-UD3R @ 766.1MHz - 766.06 MHz Reference Frequency
TaPaKaH replied to wytiwx's topic in Result Discussions
Awesome! -
wytiwx - Core 2 Duo E8400 @ 6665.2MHz - 6665.15 mhz CPU Frequency
TaPaKaH replied to Noxinite's topic in Result Discussions
Looks like I got out of 775 (and benching altogether) at the right time :D -
5erveD - Ryzen 5 5600X @ 5973.6MHz - 6026 marks Cinebench - R20
TaPaKaH replied to shar00750's topic in Result Discussions
We made two local supermarkets run out of weissbier. Hence why P3 only ... -
wytiwx - Core 2 Duo E8500 @ 6702.9MHz - 6702.86 mhz CPU Frequency
TaPaKaH replied to Noxinite's topic in Result Discussions
700x9.5 on E8500 ... http://noisecutters.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/05/You-did-it-Product-Hunt.png -
POLL: CPUZ Feelz, let your opinion be known.
TaPaKaH replied to Splave's topic in Benchmark software
Another argument for allowing to disable / downclock cores: continuity and simplicity of rules. Imagine a new person trying to submit a score in 2021 and having to learn about differences in rules for pre-2010 and post-2010 hardware? Perhaps a separate hardware point category for all-cores-same-clock would suffice? It's not like there aren't hundreds of these already per each piece of hardware.