Jump to content
HWBOT Community Forums

TaPaKaH

Members
  • Posts

    3673
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    31

Everything posted by TaPaKaH

  1. Model: 996829 Spec: DDR3-2000 / 7-10-8-27 / 1.65V Chips: PSC XDS Did a standard voltage bin-test for 1200MHz 7-11-7 and they need 1.73V. Asking 30€ or $42 including worldwide shipping.
  2. Specs: DDR3-1800 / 7-7-7-20 / 2.00V Chips: Micron D9GTR or D9GTS Asking 18€ or $25 including worldwide shipping.
  3. P5K-series and E8x00 don't work too well, even if CPU and board are separately pretested for 600+. Getting close to 600 on such combo would involve quite a bit of luck as there is little "science" behind it.
  4. Which frequencies could the chips (fail to) achieve during your short testing?
  5. '064' serial numbers are not PSC, sorry. This is most likely Elpida BDBG (or something similar).
  6. TPP are not calculated correctly in some categories at the moment (I'm missing ~4K TPP myself), you might need to wait until it gets fixed.
  7. Unless you get the same error with .cvf files made at lower freqs, what you have seems like a typical case of a corrupt .cvf file due to an unstable system (in which case there is nothing you can do).
  8. Do you have any theoretical background behind your designs or you're just similating things on random to see what should work best?
  9. I'm not sure if the chart represents the actual situation. You can verify this via a database request, but I reckon that PSU is more frequently mentioned (also for marketing purposes) on the "high-end" scores (where high wattage is a must) whereas low-end and/or legacy stuff rarely features PSU info (might as well be due to obscure old PSUs not even being in database), which could skew the rankings a bit.
×
×
  • Create New...