Jump to content
HWBOT Community Forums

I.nfraR.ed

Members
  • Posts

    2403
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    27

Everything posted by I.nfraR.ed

  1. I can't even get close to you, guys At least that 4200+ Manchester is good (3520 for 3D).
  2. Yeah, I don't see it happening 106 fps at HDR1 is way too much for my system.
  3. Seems like reference design. Great clocks, not many people able to push that far. Great score as well.
  4. I give you the responsibility to decide whether it's a lucky draw or the highest ranked air/water overclocker out of the top-3 . The latter is better, imo. All I want to see from the competition is some records broken. Hopefully someone will achive this. It won't be me, I don't have records-capable chips.
  5. If I manage to get some of the top 3 places (very very unlikely, imo), I would give my prize to a lucky draw between air/water guys. I don't even have AM3+ motherboard myself, but it doesn't matter . Now, let's see some serious air/water results! PS: Uh, maybe it should be given to the best air/water guy overall, otherwise I don't encourage pushing hard, but only participating, lol. So, let it be "the top air/water guy (not in top 3) gets it"
  6. Nice one. Still not tried to improve my score, but hey...2 more days left
  7. Hey, there are plenty of OCers registered in 1970 (including me), so it must be some of them
  8. Let it be colbugged, let it be...(rofl) Seriously, I might not have a chance if it clocks good under SS . All my duals are locked.
  9. WTF, saw some of your videos...you're advetising registration to some online game? In fact the benchmark had been ran at 640x480 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pjHHMcElCwE&list=UUI8HC7Dfxwt2n4lOnPKo8eg&index=9&feature=plcp?
  10. Where's the video? The resolution benchmark had been run at is not visible. According to the rules it should be visible in the screenshot. Again, see the rules for this benchmark: http://hwbot.org/news/875_application_2_rules/
  11. Where's your details screen? Other important information is missing as well. See the rules here: http://hwbot.org/news/874_application_1_rules/
  12. Not that nice, but ok chip. Freaks out when trying to complete Pi32M even at 3050. HC, your cpu seems awesome! Never had s.939 cpu that is so ht ref. limited.
  13. ... when you realize it's time for work and you've benched all the night long, telling yourself several times "one more run and then I go to bed" ... ... when arriving at the office the first thing you do is open hwbot and upload scores, then thinking all day long what you can do to improve your score in the evening ...
  14. Thanks. Lacking efficiency though. Anyway, need to finally test all these s.939 CPUs in the box.
  15. Sorry, but that's not the correct wprime version. Download the required version here: http://hwbot.org/benchmarks/processor
  16. Yep, you should be considered lucky if it runs below -40C My Opteron 165 doesn't run under 0C
  17. Does it make good contact with the case? If not, I'm afrad you need to mod it with the heavy hammer... You can alternatively add another one on the outside of the RIGHT door of the case. Don't ask which one, you should figure it out yourself, otherwise it won't work. Make sure there's enough TIM applied. It will drop your side panel temperature with up to 5*C ! You can even put the panel aside from the case, the temperature of the panel will drop even further.
  18. Not that bad Yeah, I guess you wanted 8GHz, but it might happen next time.
  19. Really nice, considering the cpu. Need to get mine out and see if it works . However your GT1 seems higher than expected.
×
×
  • Create New...