I.nfraR.ed

My Abit nForce 2 boards - 2x NF7-S v.2, 2x AN7, 1x NF7 v.2 The board on left top corner is the one that did 281MHz FSB. Aside from these, the rest of the s.A stack that I have are - one of the other legendary boards Soltek SL-75FRN2, one MSI nForce2 and another Soltek SL-KT600-R.

I think it would be logical to switch shader and memory fields. GPUZ is showing the frequencies in that order "gpu/mem/shaders", so I guess many users write the first two fields according to the gpuz readings and memory frequency is going to the shaders field. Those with Ati cards or older Nvidia cards don't even have shaders, so people write gpu/mem in the first two fields. Another possible improvement could be filter the shader field (enable/disable) based on the VGA selected, but it might lead to confusion if the user enters the clocks first and selects the VGA after that.

It seems my team is gaining the same "Gather 2000 points" achievement every day. Is that normal? http://hwbot.org/team/xtreme_oc_team_bulgaria__/#MyWall

Hard work always pays off. Congrats for the 3 great scores! You made me think about benching Llano .

Have one in the mail as well

What ambient temp?

Indeed.

Looking to buy one for myself as well . Could join you guys, even though I'm at the bottom of the rankings

Bau

1300 core for air is top of the line.

Yeah, that's why I didn't write "congraturaltions" Deal?

700 core is nothing

Very nice for water cooling

HD4890 FTW!

3.4 on air is awesome for Venice. Make it scream, but don't kill it

That Venice is not bad, really

Perhaps binning, or I'm very unlucky as always. Every time I decide to try a new cpu, I end up with a chip in the 51x - 53x range . Awesome result and cpu, mate! Looking forward to see some 3D results

You're a machine Great as always.

Did better with modified original bios after all. This card is very tricky. http://hwbot.org/submission/2244791_i.nfrar.ed_3dmark2001_se_geforce_fx_5900_xt_35641_marks Should work on the other benchmarks now.

I have Gainward FX5900XT. Would it be a problem if I flash it with FX5950U bios and submit scores under FX5900XT? I don't want to lose my time benching with the modded bios, while all scores will be invalid after that. I'd assume it's ok, since it's a standard procedure that everyone could have done back in the days the FX series were launched. As long as I provide a photo of the sticker and the whole card/system?

Maybe Deneb-based X2 5200 could do the trick as well, or even the OEM Athlons like 150u/160u/170u, but it would be tricky with those low multipliers. You'd need a very good board HT-Ref wise and the right settings.

Nice CPU, I bet it could go higher?

With the difference that we are not professionals. So, where's the problem then? If he's so good that noone could beat him, it would be the same if he had the time to bench in the beginning and uploaded the score, or benched at the end of the week. But in the second case, the rules would artificially put him on 2nd place. Don't get me wrong, I still want some different competition rules that would make it more interesting.

And what if I'm busy during the week, because of my job and bench only in the weekend, producing the score at the end of Sunday. Does it mean I'm a sandbagger? Not that I'm a factor in the OC competitions, but almost all of my scores for competitions are done this way. Always at the very last hours, due to lack of free time. Others are done in the beginning of the comp and then I had no time to improve. Since it's all about fun (no?), I'm not sure it's good to give advantage to people with a lot of free time.

This helps with air cooling. Basically the cold air screams your name...