Jump to content
HWBOT Community Forums

I.nfraR.ed

Members
  • Posts

    2448
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    36

Everything posted by I.nfraR.ed

  1. Here it is http://hwbot.org/submission/2260449_i.nfrar.ed_pifast_athlon_64_4200_x2_manchester_35.83_sec All these 2D scores with that cpu were single sucessful runs, I'm sure they can be improved further, especially wprime. Haha, yes . Soon you'll have to buy other models as well, lol. You can see my temp at the first photo from submissions with the Manchester. Need to bench properly all these s.939 cpus in the box. Some of them seem very decent. Most of them are single cores though.
  2. Oh, I disassembled everything yesterday, because I need to focus on the Gigabyte challenge. But I can use water cooling anyday LN2 is a little different story - I pay more for the taxi then the actual LN2 cost . And I have only 15L dewar, that is borrowed from a friend. But...if your challenge is interesting, I would accept it
  3. Yeah, It doesn't work for me with 1090T as well. I've never ran PCMark05 seriously, but wanted to try those transparent windows tweaks. Well, I tried it on my 24/7 system, so that might be the problem, but I see gains from mouse moving only.
  4. Congrats Honda! You did great even with AMD
  5. So I won at one thing - my cpu went down to -80C, otherwise it's a poor overcklocker on air/water Either I suck at 06, or I needed 3.7GHz to compensate for the twice as much L2 cache you have guys?
  6. Only black ninja can beat him Managed to beat all X2 4200+ Manchester scores, except wprime 32 and 1024. 15L of LN2 are not enough.
  7. I can't beat that with gtx280 @ 837/1674/1404, lol
  8. 2 cores, 3.5GHz each...that's 7GHz, lol
  9. I can't even get close to you, guys At least that 4200+ Manchester is good (3520 for 3D).
  10. Yeah, I don't see it happening 106 fps at HDR1 is way too much for my system.
  11. Damn, can't beat this with GTX280
  12. Seems like reference design. Great clocks, not many people able to push that far. Great score as well.
  13. How..with massive airflow and cold ambients, I guess
  14. I give you the responsibility to decide whether it's a lucky draw or the highest ranked air/water overclocker out of the top-3 . The latter is better, imo. All I want to see from the competition is some records broken. Hopefully someone will achive this. It won't be me, I don't have records-capable chips.
  15. If I manage to get some of the top 3 places (very very unlikely, imo), I would give my prize to a lucky draw between air/water guys. I don't even have AM3+ motherboard myself, but it doesn't matter . Now, let's see some serious air/water results! PS: Uh, maybe it should be given to the best air/water guy overall, otherwise I don't encourage pushing hard, but only participating, lol. So, let it be "the top air/water guy (not in top 3) gets it"
  16. Nice one. Still not tried to improve my score, but hey...2 more days left
  17. Hey, there are plenty of OCers registered in 1970 (including me), so it must be some of them
  18. Let it be colbugged, let it be...(rofl) Seriously, I might not have a chance if it clocks good under SS . All my duals are locked.
  19. WTF, saw some of your videos...you're advetising registration to some online game? In fact the benchmark had been ran at 640x480 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pjHHMcElCwE&list=UUI8HC7Dfxwt2n4lOnPKo8eg&index=9&feature=plcp?
  20. Where's the video? The resolution benchmark had been run at is not visible. According to the rules it should be visible in the screenshot. Again, see the rules for this benchmark: http://hwbot.org/news/875_application_2_rules/
  21. Where's your details screen? Other important information is missing as well. See the rules here: http://hwbot.org/news/874_application_1_rules/
  22. Not that nice, but ok chip. Freaks out when trying to complete Pi32M even at 3050. HC, your cpu seems awesome! Never had s.939 cpu that is so ht ref. limited.
×
×
  • Create New...