Bruno

You have PM.

Over the years hwbot worked with bench manufacturers and made it hard to cheat. Is it possible to implement a clock reader in superpi? Just to show the max clock cpu reached during benchmark. Sent from my LG-D722 using Tapatalk

Nachtpower sounds awesome. Hahaha Sent from my LG-D722 using Tapatalk

) nice epower Sent from my LG-D722 using Tapatalk

Great job doc!

I was talking about the rig image, not the result screenshot. Sent from my LG-D722 using Tapatalk

So the system image will have to avoid the VGA also

I am in. Just waiting for the VGA

Massman is back!

Awesome!

Great job dude! Hahaha!

I am not angry. I said from the beginning that I will comply with what the mods will decide. I only want to clearly understand the decision which you already explained partially above. Yet I already knew that article, so I guess, it remains to decide the admissible percentage of luck. ) However, I got the Z170i Gaming Pro AC yesterday, so I will bench with that one.

Ok. No problem submitting another score. Just please explain here the decision in a clear and logical manner. IMO "very close to unrealistic" it is not good enough for a competition of this level. If the scores are on a mathematical graph related to the configuration, I don't see where is the competition. Just ask who knows the most tweaks or who's RAM is going higher and that's the winner. Is it correct to assume that luck has no place in this contest?

You got PM.

I won't start that discussion again. I don't think it is bugged. In the worst case, it is a lucky run, and that's not against the rules. HWBot rules apply to contest as well and ranks contains a lot of lucky runs, so no reason for mine to be bugged.

Ok, so I can use the Zadak511 kit also?

The Galax OC Lab HOF special edition kit is allowed in the competition?

Flashback works, but in its own conditions . Try a stick of max 1GB, formatted FAT32 and put the msi.rom in root. Try several time. It will run eventually.

These are clearly bugs, but 10-12 points more then "normal" (who defines normal anyway? How do you know that i don't know a nice tweak that gave me some boost?) it doesn't seem like a bug. Why can't be a lucky run?

No. Just as i sad, every benchmark has an admissible error range of at least 1%, and my score is in that range. If i would ahve got 1810+, that would probably be bug. But the scores in 1% range I think are fine, but it's not my decision. Sent from my LG-D722 using Tapatalk

Rule, I don't want to break any rules. If the score is bugged I accept it to be removed, but with solid proves. I had a lot of 1775-1780, some 1785s and 1787s and at some point 1797 came up. All on H2O, no cold. Just by playing with memory timings. It's no way to cheat at frequency with XTU, so if the app have bugs or issues, it should not be used in competitions. Or the rules should specify exactly what is the acceptable error range, because every benchmark has at least 1% admissible error.

Thanks guys!

2 for me

To stop the channel drop on R5E, just set the DRAM Training on Ignore, in BIOS memory section. Worked for me on 2 boards.

Great!