Guest Bullant Posted August 12, 2014 Posted August 12, 2014 awesome stuff as per usual Bullant!!! Looking forward to freezing some PSC on the Z97 OC Formula soon myself Thanks man,looking forward to your results too,you'll like it Quote
Guest Bullant Posted August 13, 2014 Posted August 13, 2014 Final got some passes on the little Pentium ,will try push bit more later Quote
Crew Vivi Posted August 13, 2014 Crew Posted August 13, 2014 sheez little pentium IMC going for gold!! what VSA / IOA / IOD? Quote
Guest Bullant Posted August 13, 2014 Posted August 13, 2014 I run a little less on each one then what's in nicks profile mate,the Z97 is a little different to Z87 and Gigganyte to Asrock run these volts a little different too Quote
Guest Bullant Posted August 17, 2014 Posted August 17, 2014 Little more out of the Pentium,would be nice to find a 6.6ghz Pentium Quote
Guest Bullant Posted September 7, 2014 Posted September 7, 2014 So no ln2 for a little while I did little air testing Cpu on SS -25 and memory on air ,temps about 14c 2800Mhz stability 32M pass Also did some testing on full bank memory's 4x2Gb PSC,CPU SS -25 and memory's on air about 20c on these runs. If you take note on the above 28x memory you can see with this 4x2Gb im 1.5 sec slower,everything quite loose on the 4x2Gb for the moment,not to bad considering 4x2Gb is 2666Mhz Memory's used in the 4x2Gb were Pis 2300 cl8,one good kit on air and the second kit is not very good on air at all,if I had used a better second kit im sure things would of gone even better Will test all this on Ln2 when I have next refill,should see some nice numbers once cold So still with the 4x2gb 2666,only now i start to tighten subs and few things,even tho not a pass it was only 391ms slower then 2800Mhz @ loop 18,with still plenty to tighten So I tighten a little more and was running on par with the 2800Mhz,with still little more that can be tighten and only @ 2666Mhz Was also getting some loops at 2700Mhz Also doing 2736Mhz and just about all subs tight as they normally would be Quote
Guest Bullant Posted September 7, 2014 Posted September 7, 2014 (edited) Yes mate very strong,all of the above were all rtls 40-41 and iols 4-4 here is little test i just did but had to shut down because moisture or something so wasn't able to test full stability CPU on water and memory's on SS -20 full bank,would of been bit easier if cpu was on cold too Should be quite nice once the cpu on cold and -160+ on the memorys Edited September 7, 2014 by Bullant Quote
Alex@ro Posted September 7, 2014 Posted September 7, 2014 Why do you hide tertiary? Also strong imc is a plus for sure. For your run i believe them to be 4-5-7-16-5-7-4-5-7-12-12-13.Correct me if i am wrong It's all in the tertiary,if u miss one timing that is the difference between not even posting to running 32M. Quote
Guest Bullant Posted September 7, 2014 Posted September 7, 2014 It can run all tertiary's as tight as normally would be seen apart from 2 tertiary's,so that being said it can run little tighter then you posted I believe it will run all tertiary's on cold as tight as cold is normally apart from these 2 tertiary's,I would like to test my findings on ln2 before I show tertiary's That being said its pretty easy to work out what timings they are,testing memory on air and at -20 I still wasn't able to tighten these 2 tertiary's Quote
Guest Bullant Posted September 12, 2014 Posted September 12, 2014 Had another play with some cold PSC 5Ghz and also some maxxmem Was using my old 4770K,still seems ok imc considering it wont boot 2666Mhz with cpu on air no more Cpu On SS -25 and memory was -160 2.24v 2860mhz tight was looking ok 2900Mhz tight 8M pass 2900Mhz tight 5Ghz maxxmem 2900Mhz tight maxxmem 5.791ghz, will test maxxmem again later with cpu on LN2 and lot more Ghz Quote
Crew Vivi Posted September 12, 2014 Crew Posted September 12, 2014 woooooooooow thats awesome i need to work really hard for that kind of maxmem hahaha. that 5ghz 1430 6-10-6 is looking mighty fast!! 1 Quote
Guest Bullant Posted September 12, 2014 Posted September 12, 2014 Yeah just got to get it to pass ahahah,Splave has set the bar high on this platform Quote
Guest Bullant Posted September 14, 2014 Posted September 14, 2014 Tested another 2 kits of pi's pi's 2000 cl6 -160 2.25v 5-10-5-2800Mhz promising kit does pass 32m @ 2800Mhz 6-10-6-21 tight all day long Pi's 2300 cl8 -160 2.0v 6-9-6-2800 This kit seems quite good but with limit of 2.0v could really hold this kit back,does pass 32M 6-9-6-21 -1755Mhz,should pass 32m 2800 6-10-6 6-10-6-2820 Quote
sabishiihito Posted September 21, 2014 Posted September 21, 2014 Finally got another decent PSC run, 2600 8-12-8-28-1T tWCL6. Needed 1.97v on these Ripjaws X 2200C7 sticks with black PCB! 1 Quote
Guest Bullant Posted September 21, 2014 Posted September 21, 2014 Nice,if you back off on couple timings does it let you boot 2666? Like triple 13-13-13 ,also can go 4-5-4-20-4-4-4-5-5-13-13-13,can also try tRAS 94 96 than if pass 2666 can try tighten Looking good Quote
sabishiihito Posted September 22, 2014 Posted September 22, 2014 I can boot 2666C8 just fine loading the preset, but still haven't finished a 32M run as of yet, Quote
Guest TheMadDutchDude Posted September 24, 2014 Posted September 24, 2014 EPIC RAM skills there mate! I've just ordered my OCF so hopefully I'll have some fun with it soon. I've got a 3418C011 batch G3258 to try too. Quote
Guest Bullant Posted September 24, 2014 Posted September 24, 2014 Thanks mate Very nice,you'll enjoy it,looking forward to your results Quote
Alex@ro Posted September 24, 2014 Posted September 24, 2014 Nice results man,but this is not real c5,should had given much better speed boost.C5+twcl 5 would also allow RTL to 34/35 and should be stupid fast. 1 Quote
Guest Bullant Posted September 24, 2014 Posted September 24, 2014 (edited) Not sure what you on about but I had a tighter cl6 run and it was slower,the cl5 run was little looser and faster so to me cl5 must be real It may not be super efficient because of cl5 and twcl6 but it is what it is Also I never ran twcl5 it twcl6 ,we not talking about cl5-twcl5,it is cl5 twcl6 I would think when cl goes behind twcl like I have cl5 twcl6 its not super efficient but still a improvement as my results prove it Have you ever ran this type of result to say it not real? Edited September 24, 2014 by Bullant Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.