Mean Machine Posted August 18, 2011 Share Posted August 18, 2011 You guys are no fun. It takes ballz ballz ballz of steel to wait to the last second and pray that the server traffic due to everyone logging in to find the out come doesn't slow it down so bad that the submit barely makes the timeline. True story. Quite futile though. I doubt anyone will start benching for a better score even if you post your scores a half an hour early. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Crew Leeghoofd Posted August 18, 2011 Crew Share Posted August 18, 2011 (edited) Will leeghoofd ever come out of the closet? Now everybody knows where I live, thanks a lot B... Really no time for this, need to review more, manufacturers breathing down my neck... and the latest SB I have tested monday evening is the pits I had such high hopes for it as it posted almost in windows at 58X under air. I was gonna spank SOF hard ( even though I prolly needed 200mhz on raw cpu pwoer to get his efficiency lol ) On Monday it barely did 5.6 sigh stable... ( yes massman checked the settings, it was not entirely my private fail ) So very little notorious fail overclocking from me the upcoming weeks/months/lightyears... I' leave that to Christian Ney Edited August 18, 2011 by Leeghoofd Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BenchZowner Posted August 18, 2011 Share Posted August 18, 2011 will upload a bunch of score the 20.08.2011 from 23h50 to 24h00 GMT+2 100 score submission tabs open, and a javascript to submit all simultaneously Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ME4ME Posted August 19, 2011 Share Posted August 19, 2011 just saw this score: http://hwbot.org/submission/2199839 not saying he's a cheater .. but it's suspicious to say the least. 51x or even 52x? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
chew* Posted August 19, 2011 Share Posted August 19, 2011 (edited) just saw this score: http://hwbot.org/submission/2199839 not saying he's a cheater .. but it's suspicious to say the least. 51x or even 52x? I scanned the rankings, best i saw for effec was a 5500 run at 138.076. That said I tend to agree, maybe turbo kicked in by accident................ Some quick math. The run I looked at effeciency rating ( lower is better ) 754,918 The run in question. 740,188 Thats got to be one hell of a tweak. More math. Add 51X muti to the score in question. effeciency = 755204. hmmmmmmm............... *Edit* keep in mind I scanned the rankings in the 5500 cpu range and took the best from that range, Effeciency is not always linear and best compared around the same clock speeds. Edited August 19, 2011 by chew* Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
El Gappo Posted August 19, 2011 Share Posted August 19, 2011 (edited) It's the super secret winders 7 performance mode tweak. Boobs are like bags of sand Edited August 19, 2011 by El Gappo Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Crew Leeghoofd Posted August 19, 2011 Crew Share Posted August 19, 2011 mmmm where have I seen this before Henry ? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cyclone Posted August 19, 2011 Share Posted August 19, 2011 That's why at first there was a question about 'locked multi' proof during the test run... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
chew* Posted August 19, 2011 Share Posted August 19, 2011 That's why at first there was a question about 'locked multi' proof during the test run... We are all preety educated here on what is and is not possible and therefore further proof is not really needed in most cases. It's never wise to jump to conclusions till the math is done however. It can make you and or the other party look bad. After the what is and or is not possible is determined the next obvious step is to determine how and why, if the score was in no mans land say 745,00-750,000 effeciency range which would more than likely indicate a run done in the "middle" it could very well be written off as a bugged run. That sort of narrows a bug out of the picture. I stick by my final math though, the effeciency is to "spot on" when you calculate it at 51X. Whether it was a turbo issue or intentional is up to hwbot admins. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BenchZowner Posted August 19, 2011 Share Posted August 19, 2011 Sandy Bridge 2600K, same hardware config & settings, various operating systems & wPrime v1.55 - 1024m test: WinXP x86 = 191.14s WinVista x86 = 216.858s WinVista x64 = 217.112s Win7 x86 = 215.949s Win7 x64 = 216.052s ... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cyclone Posted August 19, 2011 Share Posted August 19, 2011 Totally agree chew. Anyway if you have some additional proof it's always easier to explain 'how?' to a brilliant result. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Massman Posted August 19, 2011 Author Share Posted August 19, 2011 Score of course removed. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hondacity Posted August 19, 2011 Share Posted August 19, 2011 smart move! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ME4ME Posted August 19, 2011 Share Posted August 19, 2011 mmmm where have I seen this before Henry ? yea... deja-vu haha anyway, good to see that a decision is made. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cyclone Posted August 19, 2011 Share Posted August 19, 2011 Sandy Bridge 2600K,same hardware config & settings, various operating systems & wPrime v1.55 - 1024m test: WinXP x86 = 191.14s WinVista x86 = 216.858s WinVista x64 = 217.112s Win7 x86 = 215.949s Win7 x64 = 216.052s ... Nice stats!Anyway somebody might have got only 1.3-1.5s difference between XP & 7-64 at 2600K@4.15 GHz so this should not be taken too close Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hondacity Posted August 19, 2011 Share Posted August 19, 2011 Nice stats!Anyway somebody might have got only 1.3-1.5s difference between XP & 7-64 at 2600K@4.15 GHz so this should not be taken too close you win7 tweaker you! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cyclone Posted August 19, 2011 Share Posted August 19, 2011 (edited) you win7 tweaker you! Unfortunately this won't help 'cuz I've already got two dead MSI LGA1155 boards with two killed cherry-sample 2600Ks. The one that I've borrowed sucks at high BCLK so my GAME seems to be OVER Anyone more? -))) Edited August 19, 2011 by cyclone Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hondacity Posted August 19, 2011 Share Posted August 19, 2011 im not joining..but i think we all know who will win this already. sorry for the sandbuggers lol Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cyclone Posted August 19, 2011 Share Posted August 19, 2011 Yeah 2D rocks this time with 109.8+ MHz BCLK CPUs.. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Christian Ney Posted August 19, 2011 Share Posted August 19, 2011 96.8 bclk Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hondacity Posted August 20, 2011 Share Posted August 20, 2011 wprime'n! closeeee Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lucky_n00b Posted August 20, 2011 Share Posted August 20, 2011 3 Hours 30mins to go... Startin' to see the scoreboard is getting heated up :D * daym, cannot stop pressing F5 * Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ME4ME Posted August 20, 2011 Share Posted August 20, 2011 Massman... hwbot timings is 10 minutes off *now its 23:59 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
xoqolatl Posted August 20, 2011 Share Posted August 20, 2011 Maybe it's on purpose to allow last minute backups Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Crew Vivi Posted August 20, 2011 Crew Share Posted August 20, 2011 Welldone Perica!! For The Wiiiiiiin Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.