71proste Posted November 19, 2007 Share Posted November 19, 2007 http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=637663 project isn't valid http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=607923 project isn't valid http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=637667 project isn't valid http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=569156 project isn't valid Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kretfr Posted November 19, 2007 Share Posted November 19, 2007 Screens haven't CPU-Z Memory window. http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=649584 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=650183'>http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=650183 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=650272 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=646132 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=645795 Suspicious results of Pifast: 1st - http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=650183 - 26.86s @ 3410 MHz 2nd - http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=657929 - 36.6s @ 3314 MHz 3rd - http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=634771 - 37.22s @ 3224 MHz 4th - http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=649644 - 39.77s @ 3307 MHz 5th - http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=633553 - 40s @ 3009 MHz Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pepek86 Posted November 21, 2007 Share Posted November 21, 2007 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=659104 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=659020 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=666878 screens don't show resolution Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
aspstein Posted November 22, 2007 Share Posted November 22, 2007 Wrong PCMark05 results: http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=628686 - Dead validation link http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=602394 - No screenshot and dead validation link Look at this score, under the test phane in pcmark, is it supposed to look that way? Looks photoshoped to me. http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=655301 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
boblemagnifique Posted November 22, 2007 Share Posted November 22, 2007 Not good time : http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=640950 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bwanasoft Posted November 22, 2007 Share Posted November 22, 2007 Never a XP 2000 CPU Cpu z fail - Wrong superpi verfication - Think other CPU http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=666801 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=666797 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Crew Turrican Posted November 22, 2007 Crew Share Posted November 22, 2007 he postet the "cpu score" instead of the "pcmark score". see screenshot http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=665550 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dinos22 Posted November 23, 2007 Share Posted November 23, 2007 Not good time : http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=640950 lol that's a 23m+ run heheheheh Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
demiurg Posted November 23, 2007 Share Posted November 23, 2007 Not good time : http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=640950 I can not fix this result, because it is already checked by crew moderator Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hipro5 Posted November 24, 2007 Share Posted November 24, 2007 Incorrect time writen.....Not fair for stoolman.... http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=663503 . Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Maxi Posted November 24, 2007 Share Posted November 24, 2007 Fixed, thanks hipro. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Maxi Posted November 24, 2007 Share Posted November 24, 2007 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=659104http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=659020 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=666878 screens don't show resolution Fixed. Wrong PCMark05 results: http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=628686 - Dead validation link http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=602394 - No screenshot and dead validation link Look at this score, under the test phane in pcmark, is it supposed to look that way? Looks photoshoped to me. http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=655301 #1 fixed, #2 was previously validated by a moderator, #3 nothing wrong with this. Not good time : http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=640950 Bug, we're working on it Never a XP 2000 CPU Cpu z fail - Wrong superpi verfication - Think other CPU http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=666801 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=666797 No these are fine bwana, please look before reporting. he postet the "cpu score" instead of the "pcmark score". see screenshot http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=665550 Fixed I can not fix this result, because it is already checked by crew moderator Actually there is a bug somewhere, I can't fix it either. We're looking at this. Thanks for reporting everyone Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Crew Turrican Posted November 24, 2007 Crew Share Posted November 24, 2007 no resolution, video card clocks and cpu clocks are shown http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=605326 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SArd Posted November 24, 2007 Share Posted November 24, 2007 It not GeForce 7600 Go GT, but is simple GeForce 7600 GT http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=656560 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bwanasoft Posted November 25, 2007 Share Posted November 25, 2007 @ Maxi My benches are the same before but opolonos blocked all The Windows PI Calculate Done fail. Fix it this are not a real verification !!! CPUZ FAIL - look here your Rules http://www.hwbot.org/img/examples/SuperPi.jpg look at your verification Options http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=666797 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=666801 look at the times from the other benches - CAN NOT BE ! Its other CPU Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bwanasoft Posted November 25, 2007 Share Posted November 25, 2007 PCMARK 05 Screen for CPU SCORE all Wrong - the CPU´s dosn´t Support SSE and PcMark05 goes not with Grafikbench. Athlon CPU http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=665540 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=665541 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=665543 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=665544 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=665545 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=665546 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=665547 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=665548 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=665549 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=667379 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=667384 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=667389 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=667403 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=667413 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=667418 Duron CPU http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=665826 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=665829 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=665831 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=665833 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=641743 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=665835 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=665836 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=665838 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
klopcha Posted November 25, 2007 Share Posted November 25, 2007 Quote:Originally Posted by klopcha View Post Kindly I remind Originally Posted by klopcha View Post http://hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=644052 ??? If results 2001 and 2003 it is necessary to block and Aquamark have been blocked Sorry for my bad english. WHEN me will hear? HEAR? Quote: Originally Posted by klopcha View Post Malicious Cheater - Paulo Jorge ( Team: Techzonept) !!!!!!!! GeForce FX5600 - 3D 2003 Mark 3542 marks - Paulo Jorge (Techzonept) - (GeForce FX 5600 @ 391/343mhz) 3458 marks - PJ (Techzonept) - (GeForce FX 5600 @ 390/335mhz ) 3373 marks - PFJ (Techzonept) - (GeForce FX 5600 @ 391/343mhz) 3368 marks - AGP (Techzonept) - (GeForce FX 5600 @ 393/343mhz) 3232 marks - M_Guy (Techzonept) - (GeForce FX 5600 @ 390/335mhz) In 3D Mark 2001, 2005 situation similar. The identical CPU, MB, RAM. I ask to take very strict measures. Where are Moderators ? If have heard the Potapicus it is time to hear me also Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
boblemagnifique Posted November 25, 2007 Share Posted November 25, 2007 it's not P4 3.0Ghz Northwood (P4 830D 3.0) = http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=503683 it's not P4 3.0Ghz Northwood (P4 631 cedar) = http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=644498 No screen for sascha = http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=506893 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ginner Posted November 25, 2007 Share Posted November 25, 2007 result and screenshot does not match in time http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=661908 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Maxi Posted November 26, 2007 Share Posted November 26, 2007 look at the times from the other benches You are correct, sorry I missed that before PCMARK 05 Screen for CPU SCORE all Wrong - the CPU´s dosn´t Support SSE and PcMark05 goes not with Grafikbench. Athlon CPU http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=665540 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=665541 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=665543 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=665544 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=665545 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=665546 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=665547 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=665548 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=665549 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=667379 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=667384 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=667389 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=667403 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=667413 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=667418 Duron CPU http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=665826 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=665829 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=665831 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=665833 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=641743 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=665835 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=665836 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=665838 Thanks, we are looking into this. If have heard the Potapicus it is time to hear me also I don't understand what your asking us for, can someone help you clarify? it's not P4 3.0Ghz Northwood (P4 830D 3.0) = http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=503683 it's not P4 3.0Ghz Northwood (P4 631 cedar) = http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=644498 No screen for sascha = http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=506893 1 & 2 fixed, #3 too old to block, already moderator verified & it's sascha. result and screenshot does not match in time http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=661908 Fixed. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kolian Posted November 26, 2007 Share Posted November 26, 2007 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=624332 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=667451 That's SLI, not single 7600GS DDR2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
klopcha Posted November 27, 2007 Share Posted November 27, 2007 I don't understand what your asking us for, can someone help you clarify? Do not pay attention. Please fix: 1.) Kindly I remind Originally Posted by klopcha View Post http://hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=644052 ??? If results 2001 and 2003 it is necessary to block and Aquamark have been blocked. 2.) Malicious Cheater - Paulo Jorge ( Team: Techzonept) !!!!!!!! GeForce FX5600 - 3D 2003 Mark 3542 marks - Paulo Jorge (Techzonept) - (GeForce FX 5600 @ 391/343mhz) 3458 marks - PJ (Techzonept) - (GeForce FX 5600 @ 390/335mhz ) 3373 marks - PFJ (Techzonept) - (GeForce FX 5600 @ 391/343mhz) 3368 marks - AGP (Techzonept) - (GeForce FX 5600 @ 393/343mhz) 3232 marks - M_Guy (Techzonept) - (GeForce FX 5600 @ 390/335mhz) In 3D Mark 2001, 2005 situation similar. The identical CPU, MB, RAM. I ask to take very strict measures. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kolian Posted November 27, 2007 Share Posted November 27, 2007 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=651088 "wPrime 32m - 21sec 0ms" but on the screenshot there is 21sec 875ms... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dinos22 Posted November 27, 2007 Share Posted November 27, 2007 ^^^^^^^^^^^^that's not a user fault i've seen that happen with many other entries including my own which i corrected later just the way this software messes up sometimes Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Crew Turrican Posted November 27, 2007 Crew Share Posted November 27, 2007 yeah, i also corrected my entries Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts