lunatic@98 Posted December 20, 2007 Share Posted December 20, 2007 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=677482 No resolution. I can see 1280 x 1024 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kolian Posted December 21, 2007 Share Posted December 21, 2007 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=652927 that lools like PiFast 4.3, not 4.1... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Praz Posted December 22, 2007 Share Posted December 22, 2007 Look at all the other scores below first and second place . Both of these submissions were done with SLI. http://www.hwbot.org/searchResults.do;jsessionid=3E33640C0D6E87BEF73C062D014D37C6?direction=&applicationId=12&teamId=0&userName=&gpu=GeForce+8800+GTS+640+Mb+%283616%29&numberOfVideocards=one&cpu=&chipset=&model=&manufacturer=&minScore=&maxScore=&gpuId=1042&cpuId=0&chipsetId=0&modelId=0&manufacturerId=0&offset=0&displayAdvanced=false&countryId=0&dateFrom=&dateUntil=&minGpuCoreFreq=&maxGpuCoreFreq=&minGpuMemFreq=&maxGpuMemFreq=&minCpuFreq=&maxCpuFreq=&system=&minTotalPoints= Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Massman Posted December 23, 2007 Share Posted December 23, 2007 Look at all the other scores below first and second place . Both of these submissions were done with SLI. http://www.hwbot.org/searchResults.do;jsessionid=3E33640C0D6E87BEF73C062D014D37C6?direction=&applicationId=12&teamId=0&userName=&gpu=GeForce+8800+GTS+640+Mb+%283616%29&numberOfVideocards=one&cpu=&chipset=&model=&manufacturer=&minScore=&maxScore=&gpuId=1042&cpuId=0&chipsetId=0&modelId=0&manufacturerId=0&offset=0&displayAdvanced=false&countryId=0&dateFrom=&dateUntil=&minGpuCoreFreq=&maxGpuCoreFreq=&minGpuMemFreq=&maxGpuMemFreq=&minCpuFreq=&maxCpuFreq=&system=&minTotalPoints= Which ones exactly? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Massman Posted December 23, 2007 Share Posted December 23, 2007 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=656289 - no resolution Also look for my previous post I can see 1280 x 1024 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=652927that lools like PiFast 4.3, not 4.1... Fixed Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Massman Posted December 23, 2007 Share Posted December 23, 2007 http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=612881 sli score in single kategorie,not possible No link, No image....please remove http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=640561 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=672632 - disable post-processing.Please remove this result!!! Fixed Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Massman Posted December 23, 2007 Share Posted December 23, 2007 pleace check this http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=677400 I can´t see the resolution on this micro Picture (3D06 Advanted Edition) http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=677811 no resolution (3D05 prof Edition) http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=677405 no resolution (3D03 prof Edition) http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=677748 need more proof of the screen http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=676554 and http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=676845 the same user with same card http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=675509 no resolution http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=672632 - disable post-processing http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=675099 - again picture without any information.As I can see on any picture he submit he didn't show memory/gpu clock of the card. http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=676464 - and score too high(and look the scores with 7300gt ddr3 in aquamark with much higher clocks and better cpu and they have similar score). See for example: http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=625681 (which is ok score) - he has a way better cpu and 10MHz more for core, and 60 MHz less for memory, and a score more than 10% less then johncsj's score. The user registers identical results:http://hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=677498 and http://hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=673245 ; http://hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=677481 and http://hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=677482 . The user has FX5200 SE only now. http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=677223 this result was blocked already,but is on the top again,what is wrong???wrong resolution,should be 1280/1024 not 1024/768http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=676279 resolution not visible http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=675929 wrong resolution again http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=648594 name of card missing http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=625871 name of card missing http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=629564 name of card missing http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=599323 wrong screen http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=610133 resolution not visible This user is definitely cheating somehow, he has DDR1 Memory at 400MHz, an Opteron clocked at 3GHz and a X1950 Pro clocked at 635 / 709 and has 7554 3D Marks in 3DMark06. Impossible!http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=665260 I made a Bench by myself with E6700 @ 3,6GHz, Dual DDR2 @ 920MHz and the same Graphics Card X1950 Pro @ 645 / 820 and get 5800 3D Marks, so the user listed above cannot get more than 2800 3DMarks with such a crappy Hardware! Besides: Almost all Users in the list "Benchmarking -> Benchmark Results -> Search -> 3DMark 06 + X1950 Pro 256 Single" has NO verification Link to Futuremark! Only Images, that could be made with Paint and some "Verification Links" to HWBot itself! Futuremark Verification Links should be necessary to submit a result! Regards, CuB3 http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=675486 wrong resolution Fixed Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DataNusse Posted December 23, 2007 Share Posted December 23, 2007 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=677978 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=676317 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=678495 (CPUZ screen is missing) http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=678496 (dubble post) http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=675728 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=680293 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=680465 (no cpuz screen) http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=680383 (no cpuz screen) http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=680292 (no cpuz screen) http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=676174 (no cpuz screen) The results are with Pentium 3, but category is Pentium 3-E (mobile). http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=559487 Athlon 64 2700+ but the category is Athlon XP 2700+ http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=559831 Athlon XP 2600+ but the category is Athlon XP 2700+ Can you please fix this. Thanx Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
71proste Posted December 23, 2007 Share Posted December 23, 2007 To Massman i made small mistake this is sli result in single kategorie: http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=545593'>http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=545593 and already removed: http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=612881 please put it back(Sergey13's score) and block that one: http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=545593 http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=648594 no name of card Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
klopcha Posted December 23, 2007 Share Posted December 23, 2007 The user has FX5200 SE only now! http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=673245 Result on FX5200SE but category FX5200. http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=677481 Result on FX5200SE but category FX5200. http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=676393 Result on 8800GT but category Radeon 8500. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
S_A_V Posted December 24, 2007 Share Posted December 24, 2007 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=679453 542 fps in mother nature - bugged run? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Praz Posted December 24, 2007 Share Posted December 24, 2007 This was done with a G92 card not a 8800 GTS 640 Mb. Wrong section. http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=679707 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PowerToTheUsers Posted December 25, 2007 Share Posted December 25, 2007 The results of giorgios th. in the Xeon 5130 category (http://www.hwbot.org/quickSearch.do?hardwareId=CPU_1259) have been reported before. They ARE falsely matched, despite what CPU-Z says. I can't report this through the normal way as it's grayed out ("This result has been moderated by the wbot crew, and can no longer be reported."). If you look at his CPU-Z screen (http://www.hwbot.org/signature.img?iid=34354&thumb=false), you can see the cpuid is 6-F-A, 6-F-E1. Furthermore this chip has a multiplier of 10, with a FSB of 200MHz. If you look at the other Xeon 5130's, you will see they have cpuid 6-F-6, 6-F-B2. Older samples had Revision A1, but there's no revision E1 like giorgios th. has. Furthermore: Xeon 5130 has a multiplier of 6x, and a FSB of 333MHz. If you take a look at the T7300-category (like CPU-Z detects it...), you will see these CPUs do have cpuid 6-F-A, 6-F-E1, and a multiplier of 10x with the default FSB of 200MHz. So please move * http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=635085 * http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=635086 * http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=635089 * http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=621962 * http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=635434 * http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=635091 to the right category... And another one (also reported before, even twice, but never looked into...) The result in http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=645676 is a Pentium4 631, check the CPUID. It corresponds to the CPUID of http://www.hwbot.org/signature.img?iid=22841&thumb=false. The user probably knew this, check the title of MSPaint in his taskbar... Furthermore you can see it's a s775-desktopboard, and the Xeon 5060 is a socket 771-CPU. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TASOS Posted December 26, 2007 Share Posted December 26, 2007 @Bwanasoft The result below should be unblocked and moved to the correct category. It has a valid FM link ... and the description (bot tags) in the forum post is correct. It's a bot missmatch http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=679684 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TASOS Posted December 26, 2007 Share Posted December 26, 2007 FM link dead. No resolution No vga info http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=642626 Just a screenshot in forumpost No FM link No resolution No vga info http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=610962 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gradus Posted December 27, 2007 Share Posted December 27, 2007 GeForce 7600 GS DDR2 Damikor - Cheater, all results on cheater driver. http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=670589 nature not real http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=670590 WoF 700+))) http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=670591 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=670592 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=670593 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=641930 SLI? ddr3? cpu (Core 2 E6300 (1.86G... @ 2730mhz on air) and 17173 marks is LOL. http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=668487 DDR3 Galaxy 7600GS Zalman 256MB(792(729)/1840)/vmod http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=624332 DDR3 or not 7600...Processor: Core 2 E4300 @ 3150mhz...140k LOL))) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gradus Posted December 27, 2007 Share Posted December 27, 2007 GeForce 8500 GT DDR2 512 Mb DeathRO (ROClockers Benching Team) all results on cheaters drivers by GOZ http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=675193 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=675199 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=675207 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=675571 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=675215 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MaSell Posted December 27, 2007 Share Posted December 27, 2007 http://hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=676575 hidded resolution http://hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=676573 hidded resolution Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gradus Posted December 27, 2007 Share Posted December 27, 2007 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=679849 not real on E4400 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gradus Posted December 27, 2007 Share Posted December 27, 2007 MaSell (Team OCX) GeForce 6600 DDR3 in GeForce 6600 DDR http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=669200 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=653290 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=656680 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=653616 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=654282 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=656671 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=669202 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=656672 Hipo (United Team of Poland) GeForce 6600 DDR3 in GeForce 6600 DDR http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=526339 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=500616 Vatos_locos (OutOfSpecs.Gr) GeForce 6600 DDR3 in GeForce 6600 DDR http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=650657 P.A.S.S.A.T (Crazy-OC Germany) Cheat http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=637950 not real on Processor: Xeon 3070 @ 2666mhz on h2o Videocard: GeForce 6600 DDR @ 551/351mhz on h2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MaSell Posted December 27, 2007 Share Posted December 27, 2007 MaSell (Team OCX)GeForce 6600 DDR3 in GeForce 6600 DDR http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=669200 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=653290 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=656680 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=653616 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=654282 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=656671 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=669202 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=656672 Those scores was added to good category, but moved by hwbot team Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bwanasoft Posted December 27, 2007 Share Posted December 27, 2007 not moved i add last week the 6600 DDR3 and now we must sort the entries Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dracosc Posted December 27, 2007 Share Posted December 27, 2007 I made a mistake and instead of posting Sandra Arithmetic score, i posted Multi-Media score. How do i delete it? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
killer55555 Posted December 27, 2007 Share Posted December 27, 2007 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=601748 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=601749 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=601746 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=601745 All this benchs are wrong.They don't have anything Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PowerToTheUsers Posted December 27, 2007 Share Posted December 27, 2007 The results of giorgios th. in the Xeon 5130 category (http://www.hwbot.org/quickSearch.do?hardwareId=CPU_1259) have been reported before. They ARE falsely matched, despite what CPU-Z says. I can't report this through the normal way as it's grayed out ("This result has been moderated by the wbot crew, and can no longer be reported.").If you look at his CPU-Z screen (http://www.hwbot.org/signature.img?iid=34354&thumb=false), you can see the cpuid is 6-F-A, 6-F-E1. Furthermore this chip has a multiplier of 10, with a FSB of 200MHz. If you look at the other Xeon 5130's, you will see they have cpuid 6-F-6, 6-F-B2. Older samples had Revision A1, but there's no revision E1 like giorgios th. has. Furthermore: Xeon 5130 has a multiplier of 6x, and a FSB of 333MHz. If you take a look at the T7300-category (like CPU-Z detects it...), you will see these CPUs do have cpuid 6-F-A, 6-F-E1, and a multiplier of 10x with the default FSB of 200MHz. So please move * http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=635085 * http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=635086 * http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=635089 * http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=621962 * http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=635434 * http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=635091 to the right category... And another one (also reported before, even twice, but never looked into...) The result in http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=645676 is a Pentium4 631, check the CPUID. It corresponds to the CPUID of http://www.hwbot.org/signature.img?iid=22841&thumb=false. The user probably knew this, check the title of MSPaint in his taskbar... Furthermore you can see it's a s775-desktopboard, and the Xeon 5060 is a socket 771-CPU. bump... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts