Jump to content
HWBOT Community Forums

Wrong Result

THRASHER2

By THRASHER2
in Submission & member moderation

 Share

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 1.8k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Days

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Days

Posted Images

Praz Newbie

Praz

Posted
Posted

Look at all the other scores below first and second place . Both of these submissions were done with SLI.

 

http://www.hwbot.org/searchResults.do;jsessionid=3E33640C0D6E87BEF73C062D014D37C6?direction=&applicationId=12&teamId=0&userName=&gpu=GeForce+8800+GTS+640+Mb+%283616%29&numberOfVideocards=one&cpu=&chipset=&model=&manufacturer=&minScore=&maxScore=&gpuId=1042&cpuId=0&chipsetId=0&modelId=0&manufacturerId=0&offset=0&displayAdvanced=false&countryId=0&dateFrom=&dateUntil=&minGpuCoreFreq=&maxGpuCoreFreq=&minGpuMemFreq=&maxGpuMemFreq=&minCpuFreq=&maxCpuFreq=&system=&minTotalPoints=

Massman Apprentice

Massman

Posted
Posted

 

Which ones exactly?

Massman Apprentice

Massman

Posted
Posted
pleace check this

 

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=677400 I can´t see the resolution on this micro Picture (3D06 Advanted Edition)

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=677811 no resolution (3D05 prof Edition)

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=677405 no resolution (3D03 prof Edition)

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=677748 need more proof of the screen

 

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=676554

and

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=676845

the same user with same card

 

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=675509 no resolution

 

 

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=675099 - again picture without any information.As I can see on any picture he submit he didn't show memory/gpu clock of the card.

 

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=676464 - and score too high(and look the scores with 7300gt ddr3 in aquamark with much higher clocks and better cpu and they have similar score).

See for example: http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=625681 (which is ok score) - he has a way better cpu and 10MHz more for core, and 60 MHz less for memory, and a score more than 10% less then johncsj's score.

 

 

http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=677223 this result was blocked already,but is on the top again,what is wrong???wrong resolution,should be 1280/1024 not 1024/768

http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=676279 resolution not visible

http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=675929 wrong resolution again

http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=648594 name of card missing

http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=625871 name of card missing

http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=629564 name of card missing

http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=599323 wrong screen

http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=610133 resolution not visible

 

This user is definitely cheating somehow, he has DDR1 Memory at 400MHz, an Opteron clocked at 3GHz and a X1950 Pro clocked at 635 / 709 and has 7554 3D Marks in 3DMark06. Impossible!

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=665260

 

I made a Bench by myself with E6700 @ 3,6GHz, Dual DDR2 @ 920MHz and the same Graphics Card X1950 Pro @ 645 / 820 and get 5800 3D Marks, so the user listed above cannot get more than 2800 3DMarks with such a crappy Hardware!

 

Besides: Almost all Users in the list "Benchmarking -> Benchmark Results -> Search -> 3DMark 06 + X1950 Pro 256 Single" has NO verification Link to Futuremark! Only Images, that could be made with Paint and some "Verification Links" to HWBot itself! Futuremark Verification Links should be necessary to submit a result!

 

Regards,

CuB3

 

 

Fixed

DataNusse Newbie

DataNusse

Posted
Posted

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=677978

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=676317

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=678495 (CPUZ screen is missing)

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=678496 (dubble post)

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=675728

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=680293

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=680465 (no cpuz screen)

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=680383 (no cpuz screen)

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=680292 (no cpuz screen)

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=676174 (no cpuz screen)

 

The results are with Pentium 3, but category is Pentium 3-E (mobile).

 

 

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=559487 Athlon 64 2700+ but the category is Athlon XP 2700+

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=559831 Athlon XP 2600+ but the category is Athlon XP 2700+

 

Can you please fix this.

Thanx :)

PowerToTheUsers Newbie

PowerToTheUsers

Posted
Posted

The results of giorgios th. in the Xeon 5130 category (http://www.hwbot.org/quickSearch.do?hardwareId=CPU_1259) have been reported before. They ARE falsely matched, despite what CPU-Z says. I can't report this through the normal way as it's grayed out ("This result has been moderated by the wbot crew, and can no longer be reported.").

If you look at his CPU-Z screen (http://www.hwbot.org/signature.img?iid=34354&thumb=false), you can see the cpuid is 6-F-A, 6-F-E1. Furthermore this chip has a multiplier of 10, with a FSB of 200MHz.

If you look at the other Xeon 5130's, you will see they have cpuid 6-F-6, 6-F-B2. Older samples had Revision A1, but there's no revision E1 like giorgios th. has. Furthermore: Xeon 5130 has a multiplier of 6x, and a FSB of 333MHz.

If you take a look at the T7300-category (like CPU-Z detects it...), you will see these CPUs do have cpuid 6-F-A, 6-F-E1, and a multiplier of 10x with the default FSB of 200MHz.

So please move

* http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=635085

* http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=635086

* http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=635089

* http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=621962

* http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=635434

* http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=635091

to the right category...

 

 

And another one (also reported before, even twice, but never looked into...)

 

The result in http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=645676 is a Pentium4 631, check the CPUID. It corresponds to the CPUID of http://www.hwbot.org/signature.img?iid=22841&thumb=false. The user probably knew this, check the title of MSPaint in his taskbar... Furthermore you can see it's a s775-desktopboard, and the Xeon 5060 is a socket 771-CPU.

gradus Newbie

gradus

Posted
Posted

GeForce 7600 GS DDR2

Damikor - Cheater, all results on cheater driver.

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=670589 nature not real

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=670590 WoF 700+)))

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=670591

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=670592

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=670593

 

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=641930 SLI? ddr3? cpu (Core 2 E6300 (1.86G... @ 2730mhz on air) and 17173 marks is LOL.

 

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=668487 DDR3

Galaxy 7600GS Zalman 256MB(792(729)/1840)/vmod

 

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=624332 DDR3 or not 7600...Processor: Core 2 E4300 @ 3150mhz...140k LOL)))

gradus Newbie

gradus

Posted
Posted

MaSell (Team OCX)

GeForce 6600 DDR3 in GeForce 6600 DDR

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=669200

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=653290

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=656680

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=653616

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=654282

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=656671

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=669202

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=656672

 

Hipo (United Team of Poland)

GeForce 6600 DDR3 in GeForce 6600 DDR

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=526339

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=500616

 

Vatos_locos (OutOfSpecs.Gr)

GeForce 6600 DDR3 in GeForce 6600 DDR

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=650657

 

P.A.S.S.A.T (Crazy-OC Germany)

Cheat

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=637950

not real on

Processor: Xeon 3070 @ 2666mhz on h2o

Videocard: GeForce 6600 DDR @ 551/351mhz on h2

MaSell Newbie

MaSell

Posted
Posted

 

Those scores was added to good category, but moved by hwbot team

PowerToTheUsers Newbie

PowerToTheUsers

Posted
Posted
The results of giorgios th. in the Xeon 5130 category (http://www.hwbot.org/quickSearch.do?hardwareId=CPU_1259) have been reported before. They ARE falsely matched, despite what CPU-Z says. I can't report this through the normal way as it's grayed out ("This result has been moderated by the wbot crew, and can no longer be reported.").

If you look at his CPU-Z screen (http://www.hwbot.org/signature.img?iid=34354&thumb=false), you can see the cpuid is 6-F-A, 6-F-E1. Furthermore this chip has a multiplier of 10, with a FSB of 200MHz.

If you look at the other Xeon 5130's, you will see they have cpuid 6-F-6, 6-F-B2. Older samples had Revision A1, but there's no revision E1 like giorgios th. has. Furthermore: Xeon 5130 has a multiplier of 6x, and a FSB of 333MHz.

If you take a look at the T7300-category (like CPU-Z detects it...), you will see these CPUs do have cpuid 6-F-A, 6-F-E1, and a multiplier of 10x with the default FSB of 200MHz.

So please move

* http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=635085

* http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=635086

* http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=635089

* http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=621962

* http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=635434

* http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=635091

to the right category...

 

 

And another one (also reported before, even twice, but never looked into...)

 

The result in http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=645676 is a Pentium4 631, check the CPUID. It corresponds to the CPUID of http://www.hwbot.org/signature.img?iid=22841&thumb=false. The user probably knew this, check the title of MSPaint in his taskbar... Furthermore you can see it's a s775-desktopboard, and the Xeon 5060 is a socket 771-CPU.

bump...

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
 Share
Go to topic listing
×
×
  • Create New...