Jump to content
HWBOT Community Forums

Wrong Result

THRASHER2

By THRASHER2
in Submission & member moderation

 Share

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 1.8k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Days

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Days

Posted Images

mAlkAv!An Newbie

mAlkAv!An

Posted
Posted
High for that clocks? Did you get that RAM is 310 not DDR? It's 620DDR - and that's the main reason. As for the default settings, I didn't change anything. I'll try to rebench it today and make an ORB registration.

 

Well, the screen says ur bench wasn't run using default settings. And even with better vram ur gpu has lower clock.

You: ram@310 Me: ram@264 --> difference=46Mhz

You: gpu@290 Me: gpu@338 --> difference=48Mhz

 

In addition 3DMark01 is kind of cpu-limitated... So i wonder how u got that much points.

klopcha Collaborator

klopcha

Posted
Posted
Well, the screen says ur bench wasn't run using default settings.

I agree.

 

And even with better vram ur gpu has lower clock.

You: ram@310 Me: ram@264 --> difference=46Mhz

In addition 3DMark01 is kind of cpu-limitated...

It do not agree. The Mark 2001 is dependent on videomemory (FX5200SE has 64-bit memory interface). The 03,05,06 Mark's is dependent on GPU Core.

 

http://hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=627510

http://hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=619487

Identical result,hardware,screenshot on 2 user

 

http://hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=626738

http://hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=626988

Almost same hardware, almost the same screenshots, but submited by 2 different users

 

http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=626819 Screenshot is wrong (not informative screen)

http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=625567 Screenshot is wrong

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=625535 Similary

http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=638176 Similary

http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=621976 Similary

http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=621958 Similary

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=632600 Similary

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=626820 Similary

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=626821 Similary

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=626822 Similary

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=625383 Similary

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=625790 Similary

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=625587 Similary

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=622602 Similary

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=638562 Similary

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=622610 Similary

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=629658 Similary

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=629767 Similary

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=629708 Similary

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=629696 Similary

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=622606 Similary

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=629662 Similary

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=629769 Similary

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=629702 Similary

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=609549 Similary

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=666450 Similary

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=693592 Similary

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=593538 Similary

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=632237 Similary

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=567032 Similary

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=627512 Similary

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=626317'>http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=626317 Similary

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=626434 Similary

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=570903 Similary

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=570427 Similary

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=570909 Similary

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=628123 Similary

http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=699169 Similary

http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=693341'>http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=693341 Similary

http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=698550 Similary

http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=689918 Similary

http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=688689 ...

http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=685355 ..

http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=688777 ..

http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=685286 ...

http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=693341 ...

http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=645029 ...

http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=649335 ...

http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=692772 ..

http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=689836 ...

http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=666055'>http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=666055 ..

http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=655866 ..

http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=666055 Similary

 

 

 

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=570894 The name of a videocard is not displayed

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=643620 Similary

 

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=643025 Result on GF4 Ti4200 x8, but category Radeon 9500.

 

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=625854 Real result 16.5 seconds

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=680610 Real result 1695 Mhz

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=621462 No link, no screenshot

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=621463 No link, no screenshot

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=622688 No link, no screenshot

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=587758 Similary

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=593540 Similary

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=587757 Similary

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=587760 Similary

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=576003 Similary

 

 

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=638563 The resolution is not visible

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=643623 The resolution is not visible

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=674762 The resolution is not visible

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=570485 Invalid result

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=567030 Link dead

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=582752 Link dead

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=643056 Link dead

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=620141 Link dead

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=607784 Link dead

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=632183 Similary

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=626317 Similary

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=603195 Similary

http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=587077 Similary

http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=634079 Similary

http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=615482 Similary

 

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=633620 Link fake

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=638951 Screenshot fake

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=641422 Use not Super Pi 1.5

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=641150 Use not Super Pi 1.5

 

http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=695508

Screenshot is bad. To a window of the Aquamark screenshots CPU-Z, GPU-Z are pasted.

 

http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=699563 Why the size of figures such big?

Massman Apprentice

Massman

Posted
Posted
http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=614106 - 256mb card in 128mb caterory

http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=614165 - 256mb card in 128mb caterory

 

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=687102 - hidden resolution

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=686720 - FM link dead

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=663147 - hidden resolution

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=622683 - too high score for these clocks and cpu & hidden resolution (probably lowered)

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=569141 - hidden resolution

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=687603 - FM link dead

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=640449 - running at not default settings

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=661167 - hidden resolution

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=573236 - hidden resolution

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=572279 - hidden resolution

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=654035 - hidden resolution

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=649591 - hidden resolution

 

 

 

Great work massman and thanks, but you missed some.

 

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=559487 Athlon 64 2700+ but the category is Athlon XP 2700+

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=559831 Athlon XP 2600+ but the category is Athlon XP 2700+

 

and

 

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=678496 Its a Pentium 3, but category is Pentium 3-E (mobile).

 

Thanks

 

PS.

More.

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=689458 Its a MX440-8X (NV18), the category is NX440 (NV17)

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=689299 Its a MX440-8X (NV18), the category is NX440 (NV17)

 

And can you please take a look at this:

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=621238

The score is suspiciously high. There is lack of validation of CPU and GPU.

 

wrong categorie. that's no mobile celeron 1.8ghz. ;)

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=690036

 

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=689341 -> unrealistic Score (~49000) - 2nd Place has ~ 27000

 

 

 

Any Moderator see this:

 

Narmer - ClockMeUp! (United Team of Poland)

 

Wrong and Missing , CPU - Data and Grafic-card Data

 

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=658364

 

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=659335

 

No resolution

 

http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=690520

 

CPU-Z : No , validation link of CPU-Z

 

http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=689259

 

http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=658371

 

http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=678967

 

 

Sweet

 

The new 3DMark05 'WR' is kinda typing mistake...

 

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=691102

 

will take some more years for us to reach 290693 points :D

 

http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=668396

 

See , sreeen...is one Q6600 not Amd64 3000+

 

Sweet

 

P.d: All we were wrong, but I apologize for a single mistake

Sorry for my English, I'm Spanish

 

 

 

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=631560

 

 

But it's still wrong: it's the same result as http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=591247, which is matched correctly.

 

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=558036

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=635559

 

WTF?!

 

In both case the result should have been moderated? Ranked results without verification link...

 

 

1st http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=661526'>http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=661526

2nd http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=664123'>http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=664123

 

http://www.hwbot.org/quickSearch.do?hardwareId=CPU_1039

the 1st and 2nd place are from the same user in this categorie and points are count for first and the second place. ;)

 

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=660743

 

humm strange how it says 2 of 2 cores and not what it should say 4 of 4 cores ive just ran cpuz 1.41 and it shows my quad as 4 of 4 core

so this score is not valide at all can some one plaes look at it thanks

 

http://valid.x86-secret.com/show_oc.php?id=251157 ment to be 2 0f 2 cores

 

 

 

http://valid.x86-secret.com/show_oc.php?id=267708 this one is right

 

 

Please fix:

http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=683557 hidden resolution

http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=678508 hidden resolution

http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=668730 hidden resolution

http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=582571 hidden resolution

 

http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=564989 No link, no image

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=664123 and http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=661526 2 results at 1 user

 

http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=639336 FM link dead

http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=575451 FM link dead

http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=575453 FM link dead

http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=507285 FM link dead

 

Racuch has posted the following benchmarks as seen in this link

 

http://www.hwbot.org/user.do?userId=11402

 

It shows that he's using a GeForce 8800 GT 256 Mb but if you check his screenshot for 3DMark06, rivatuner shows it clearly as 8800 GT512mb http://img120.imageshack.us/img120/5717/3dm2k6racuch18144pktrr3.jpg

 

same with 3DMark05

GPU-Z shows it as 512mb http://img179.imageshack.us/img179/1232/3dm2k528167pktracuchqg8.jpg

 

Same again in 3DMark03 http://img244.imageshack.us/img244/3073/3dm2k352569pktracuchfv7.jpg

 

3DMark01 it is hidden in the screnshot http://img184.imageshack.us/img184/2298/3dm2k188603pktracuchty0.jpg

 

Aquamark score looks unreal for 8800GT 256mb as videocard overclock compared to other GeForce 8800 GT 256 Mb seems way to high http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=691552

 

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=692532

 

Posted 8800GTS score @ GT list!

 

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=562420 hidden resolution

 

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=603944 hidden resolution

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=622754 hidden resolution

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=603643 hidden resolution

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=642465 hidden resolution

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=604004 hidden resolution

 

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=602819 hidden resolution

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=526500 hidden resolution

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=605558 hidden resolution

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=522515 hidden resolution

 

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=648686'>http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=648686 hidden resolution

_________________

 

fix it tnx!

 

Benchmark wasnt run with default settings.

Points are way to high for that clocks...

 

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=662830

 

http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=686571'>http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=686571

http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=679115

http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=686571

http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=685864

http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=679196

http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=685857

http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=685853

http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=679187

... hidden resolution...

 

Patagonian this one is ok ;)

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=648686 hidden resolution

basic edition of 3dm06

 

you can't see the used video card here: ;)

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=693970

 

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=673564 hiden resolution 13.9 points

 

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=694536 no link, no orb, no picture no nothing... 43.2 points

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=694534 no link, no orb, no picture no nothing... 34.6 points

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=673555 no link, no orb, no picture no nothing... 24.7 points

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=684107 no link, no orb, no picture no nothing...21.5 points

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=694533 no link, no orb, no picture no nothing... 10.9 points

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=662060 no link, no orb, no picture no nothing... 6 points

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=681297 no link, no orb, no picture no nothing... 8 points

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=668871 no link, no orb, no picture no nothing... 2.9 points

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=643710 no link, no orb, no picture no nothing... 4.4 points

 

What the Hell is this sh*t:

 

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=695230

 

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=694336

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=693816

Same hardware, almost the same screenshots, but submited by 2 different users

 

High for that clocks? Did you get that RAM is 310 not DDR? It's 620DDR - and that's the main reason. As for the default settings, I didn't change anything. I'll try to rebench it today and make an ORB registration.

 

ALL fixed, O Polonos deserves a lot of credit for helping me out :)

 

- Note that score older than 1y will not be blocked for insufficient verification such as screen resolution

 

- regarding lolhalol and team koc, not in the same team, not going for 'easy' points, so no reason to block

 

- might be possible I overlooked some score :S

 

- antinomy: orb link would be great, pm me and i'll verify the score

 

- klopcha, will do your list tomorrow (if I find the time :()

gradus Newbie

gradus

Posted
Posted

!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!6600DDR!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=658171 GOZ

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=658174 GOZ

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=657772 GOZ

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=658168 GOZ

 

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=688299 cheat

 

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=655229 our friend MaSell and 6600ddr3

 

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=637950 and his friend cheater passat

71proste Newbie

71proste

Posted
Posted

Nice work Massman ;)

http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=584197 hidden res.

http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=647572 pr. is not valid

http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=625838 hidden res.

http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=678661 link doesn't work

http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=679546'>http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=679546 hidden res.

http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=679546 hidden res.

71proste Newbie

71proste

Posted
Posted

http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=695914 wrong resolution,hidden anyway!!!!

http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=694660 hidden res.

http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=689538 wtf???where details,where resolution????

http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=680560 same story

http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=693345 same story,where any details and resolution????

http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=680133 project is not valid

 

I'm realy afraid to check rest of he's results,so can any H.O.T moderator check it???

knopflerbruce Apprentice

knopflerbruce

Posted
Posted

 

Maybe I missed something, but where does it say that GOZ drivers are illegal? And you shouldn't call people cheaters all the time, let the mods be the judges. Would you like it if I write a post here like "gradus cheater [link]"?

 

You post the links here, that's great. Then a mod will look at it and if necessary fix it. Making accusations like that is just plain stupid.

gradus Newbie

gradus

Posted
Posted
Maybe I missed something, but where does it say that GOZ drivers are illegal? And you shouldn't call people cheaters all the time, let the mods be the judges.

GOZ driver = normal driver + 10-15%

its normal? not cheat?

 

Would you like it if I write a post here like "gradus cheater [link]"?

Ok, do it. Link?

gradus Newbie

gradus

Posted
Posted
Exactly do not call people cheaters without reason.

There is a reason - they use the GOZ drivers not 1 or 2 times, but in many categories, though they know it's cheating.

knopflerbruce Apprentice

knopflerbruce

Posted
Posted
There is a reason - they use the GOZ drivers not 1 or 2 times, but in many categories, though they know it's cheating.

 

I don't know it's cheating. All I know is thatg you think it is. Please, show me where it says it's not legal? I'm sure the GOZ users will stop using the driver if you can give us a link or something.

 

What is so special with these drivers, btw? How can you get 15% extra by using those drivers? Uber tweaked??

gradus Newbie

gradus

Posted
Posted
I don't know it's cheating. All I know is thatg you think it is. Please, show me where it says it's not legal? I'm sure the GOZ users will stop using the driver if you can give us a link or something.

Ok, moderators, answer plz, GOZ allowed?

 

What is so special with these drivers, btw? How can you get 15% extra by using those drivers? Uber tweaked??

I don't now how can you get extra 15%, but it real. Chek it yourself.

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
 Share
Go to topic listing
×
×
  • Create New...