Christian Ney Posted July 4, 2012 Posted July 4, 2012 (edited) CPU-Z 1.61 is out! Changelog: Intel CedarTrail platform VIA VX11 chipset Intel Xeon E5 processors Fix wrong CPU clock speed under Win8 Download at CPUID Related links/news: http://HWBOT.org/newsflash/1766_cpu_z_1.61__bugs_ http://www.cpuid.com/news/55-cpu_z_1_61_bugs.html Edited May 6, 2013 by Christian Ney Quote
Mr.Scott Posted July 4, 2012 Posted July 4, 2012 1.61 totally mis-reads my 965BE. The HT link frequency, NB frequency, CPU speed, bus speed, and ram frequency are all way too high. More than 10% high. Quote
Christian Ney Posted July 4, 2012 Author Posted July 4, 2012 Please send email follow this link: http://hwbot.org/forum/showthread.php?t=41144 May also attach a screenshot with older version of cpuz vs new one to show them Quote
Mr.Scott Posted July 4, 2012 Posted July 4, 2012 Please send email follow this link:http://hwbot.org/forum/showthread.php?t=41144 May also attach a screenshot with older version of cpuz vs new one to show them Done. Thanks for the info CN. SS's are attached in case anybody is interested here. Quote
Christian Ney Posted July 5, 2012 Author Posted July 5, 2012 (edited) Saw in french forums that some dude havd 230 MHz reported in cpuz while they did set 200 MHz in the BIOS ... Btw can you try to submite some dumps online and see if they are rejected or valid ? or if the bug is present online too Edited July 5, 2012 by Christian Ney Quote
Christian Ney Posted July 5, 2012 Author Posted July 5, 2012 Guys from CPU-Z told me it has been fixed, version is still 1.61 (download link is the same) but there bug is not present Quote
GENiEBEN Posted July 5, 2012 Posted July 5, 2012 Guys from CPU-Z told me it has been fixed, version is still 1.61 (download link is the same) but there bug is not present Cool, now let's archive the original bugged version Quote
Christian Ney Posted July 5, 2012 Author Posted July 5, 2012 Will compare both later on to see if really fixed Quote
Mr.Scott Posted July 5, 2012 Posted July 5, 2012 (edited) Bug still exists. Exactly the same on my system. Bugged version validates initially, but still shows incorrect data. We'll see in a day if it gets rejected or not. http://valid.canardpc.com/show_oc.php?id=2429251 EDIT- the link provided is the version thats bugged. The copy that was sent via e-mail to me works fine. Edited July 5, 2012 by Mr.Scott Quote
Christian Ney Posted July 5, 2012 Author Posted July 5, 2012 (edited) Hum yeah, fixed only for the ZIP versions, not the installer Here is the new download link: http://www.cpuid.com/medias/files/softwares/cpu-z/cpu-z_1.61-32bits-en.zip Seems it is working: Old 1.61: New 1.61: Both done at stock, both rejected... Edited July 5, 2012 by Christian Ney Quote
Christian Ney Posted July 5, 2012 Author Posted July 5, 2012 btw, fyi: YOu can still submite using cpuz 1.60 and 1.60.1, works like a charm: http://valid.canardpc.com/show_oc.php?id=2429307 But cpuz 1.59 and under support is over. So you can't submite anymore with cpuz ver <1.60 I will ask ETA when those versions will be dropped Quote
Christian Ney Posted July 5, 2012 Author Posted July 5, 2012 Breaking news: CPIU-Z 1.60 and 1.60.1 will be supported for online validation only 1 or 2 days max from now. So if you have some 1.60.x valids lying around, submite them now! Quote
just_nuke_em Posted July 5, 2012 Posted July 5, 2012 http://valid.canardpc.com/show_oc.php?id=2408148 Rasparthe said it was likely due to the board not supporting the chip, but I think this is related to the bug also... Quote
ScunnyUK Posted July 5, 2012 Posted July 5, 2012 (edited) I had alot of bugs with ver:1.60.1 which have been fixed in the new ver:1.61, although it still has an issue with the SPD data as can be seen in this screen shot (old ver1.60.1 on the left, new ver:1.61 on the right) Online validation appears to be working fine for me aswell now http://valid.canardpc.com/show_oc.php?id=2429692 Edit, Just noticed the validation page has wrong ram settings / timings. Edited July 5, 2012 by ScunnyUK Quote
Mr.Scott Posted July 5, 2012 Posted July 5, 2012 http://valid.canardpc.com/show_oc.php?id=2408148 Rasparthe said it was likely due to the board not supporting the chip, but I think this is related to the bug also... Wrong version for the bug. That version works fine. Rasparthe is probably correct. Quote
ScunnyUK Posted July 5, 2012 Posted July 5, 2012 OK ver:1.61 has just bugged out on me and it is letting me submit the bugged result for validation. I just started playing by trying to raise FSB by 5 using Turbo V Evo. I already had 1 instance of CPU-Z open. Trying to apply the extra FSB didnt work and no changes appeared in cpu-z or turbo V evo, I tried a second time with just 3 extra FSB and again it did not apply or make any changes. So next I tried to up the cpu multi by x1 which upon clicking apply worked and raised the multiplyer from x8 to x9, but in cpu-z the FSB, HT, NB and ram speeds also all increased along with the cpu's clock speed by an extra 37 FSB, thus giving me false results. I opened another instance of cpu-z which read all speeds / Mhz correctly but then I tried to submit from the bugged instance and was able to get a valid result. http://valid.canardpc.com/show_oc.php?id=2429861 Screenys show bugged cpu-z at top with correct at bottom. Quote
Mr.Scott Posted July 5, 2012 Posted July 5, 2012 Had the same issue bro. It validated a bugged result. Quote
Christian Ney Posted July 5, 2012 Author Posted July 5, 2012 @ SkunnyUK, Tried the new version of 1.61 ? (zip no install) Quote
I.M.O.G. Posted July 5, 2012 Posted July 5, 2012 @ SkunnyUK, Tried the new version of 1.61 ? (zip no install) Is there more than one version of version 1.61? I thought the installable and zip were the same. I think the bug he's describing was the same problem with the 8.5GHz validation that was pulled. Quote
GENiEBEN Posted July 6, 2012 Posted July 6, 2012 Can't they just increase version numbering to 1.62 for the fixed one? Quote
Christian Ney Posted July 6, 2012 Author Posted July 6, 2012 No, he "fixed" the bug of the bus but kept the version named 1.61, he didn't want to release 1.61.1 less than 24 hours after the 1.61 lol so yeah there is the 1.61old and 1.61new But he fixed only the zip files not the installer yet (so install version may still be bugged) Quote
TaPaKaH Posted July 6, 2012 Posted July 6, 2012 why not call the "new" version 1.61.1 to avoid confusion? Quote
Christian Ney Posted July 6, 2012 Author Posted July 6, 2012 why not call the "new" version 1.61.1 to avoid confusion? Read my last post (not this one, the last one before this one ) Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.