Jump to content
HWBOT Community Forums

CPU-Z 1.61 is out! Bugs, feedbacks go in here

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 152
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Last version of CPU-Z is online, free of clocks reading bugs, please use this one (1.61.2) and not previous ones, support for 1.60.x and 1.61.0/1 will be dropped shortly http://www.cpuid.com/softwares/cpu-z/versions-history.html


If you have any weird behavior please report here, thanks for your help.


Bugs fixed:

Trinity memory clock reading (was divided by 2)

AMD Bulldozer/K10 clock reading (multi bug, htt bug, oc bug and so)

LGA775 multiplier higher than stock one causing false clock reading on unlocked processors

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Ok, uploaded some screenshot on imgur - http://imgur.com/a/KvRl0

Explaining one by one, although it's visible what i did.

System info

- Phenom II X2 555 unlocked to B55, running at 3.8, 2.8 cpu-nb and 1600 memory

Crosshair IV Formula, Windows 7 x64 Ultimate


1. set multi on first core one notch up, resulting in 3.9GHz for the first core only, cpuz thinks I've reduced the fsb by 5-6MHz

2. multi set to lowest x4, cpuz thinks I've increased the fsb to 953Mhz, which leads to memory at 3813 (DDR3-7626) and uncore at 13.34GHz

3. fsb set to 205, nothing happens on cpu-z. TurboEVO crashed

4. multi on first core set to 1 notch down (0.5x), fsb goes 6MHz up according to cpuz

5. Correct 24/7 settings


Opening cpuz after setting multi/fsb doesn't change a bit, still reads wrong clocks

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I use an Gigabyte 990FX UD3 and have same Problems with 960T, it doesn't matter how many cores i use.


can you give us some more info about the setup ?

CPUZ 1.61.2 ?


if so please send a report.txt non bugged and a report.txt bugged (tell me the real clocks or what clocks should be read) to christian [at] hwbot.org . Many Thanks

Link to comment
Share on other sites

My turn.

I have a Pentium Pro 200 and versions from 1.60 up to 1.61.2 do not fully support the cpu, the ram or the motherboard. And I get the following report when trying to validate




Better support in version 1.59, still no motherboard but at least it shows the cpu n ram speeds but of course cant validate because its an older version :rolleyes:




Why is support for ANY cpu removed when making a newer version?

How would I go about submitting my runs with the above issues?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm losing speed with the New 1.61.2 revision here. Can I please use the far more stable 1.60 and see if we can get cpu-z to get the validator to comply with 1.60 until the comp is over or they have something stable.


Getting cpu speed readouts as low as 26.xx mhz...


Here's an example of a 4mhz loss. The speed is constantly moving around as well.




Also the new cpu-z rev. can not see my windows oc. I find it useless at this point.


See pics below.


Thanks for any help yes?

Edited by ShrimpBrime
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Create New...