Mehdi_FXX Posted January 30, 2013 Share Posted January 30, 2013 old results not calculate! in some of last versio and this version and still not fixed. for exp: http://hwbot.org/submission/2131796_olesius_superpi___32m_core_i5_660_8min_59sec_777ms http://hwbot.org/submission/921894_olesius_pifast_core_i7_920_19.28_sec http://hwbot.org/submission/930399_olesius_cpu_frequency_core_i7_860_5135_mhz http://hwbot.org/submission/930643_olesius_wprime___32m_core_i7_860_5sec_0ms http://hwbot.org/submission/862143_olesius_wprime___32m_core_2_e7300_%282.66ghz%29_16sec_660ms http://hwbot.org/submission/884943_olesius_wprime___32m_core_2_p8600_%282.4ghz%29_32sec_200ms these are only 6! I found more than 50 results in only one member!, maybe you think 2 or 3 point is not important but not about more than 100 results...... i edit more than 50 results + team point recalculated but not corect! only 40point added I can check all results even 1000 result but recalculating is not correct Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Massman Posted January 31, 2013 Author Share Posted January 31, 2013 old results not calculate! in some of last versio and this version and still not fixed. for exp: http://hwbot.org/submission/2131796_olesius_superpi___32m_core_i5_660_8min_59sec_777ms http://hwbot.org/submission/921894_olesius_pifast_core_i7_920_19.28_sec http://hwbot.org/submission/930399_olesius_cpu_frequency_core_i7_860_5135_mhz http://hwbot.org/submission/930643_olesius_wprime___32m_core_i7_860_5sec_0ms http://hwbot.org/submission/862143_olesius_wprime___32m_core_2_e7300_%282.66ghz%29_16sec_660ms http://hwbot.org/submission/884943_olesius_wprime___32m_core_2_p8600_%282.4ghz%29_32sec_200ms these are only 6! I found more than 50 results in only one member!, maybe you think 2 or 3 point is not important but not about more than 100 results...... i edit more than 50 results + team point recalculated but not corect! only 40point added I can check all results even 1000 result but recalculating is not correct "Olesius -Matrix R&D has chosen to disable points for this submission." => There are not supposed to be points for these submissions EDIT: This seems like a bug too, unless I need to sleep more PIFAST: Huh. Do you have that every time? It's a bug indeed, but I wonder why you're the only person reporting it so far. Added to the buglist though. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GENiEBEN Posted January 31, 2013 Share Posted January 31, 2013 Huh. Do you have that every time? It's a bug indeed, but I wonder why you're the only person reporting it so far.. I only noticed it today because next two scores were 2 and 3ms apart from mine so it kinda looked out of line. Will try to get another Pifast score ending with a 0 and see if it's bugged. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mehdi_FXX Posted January 31, 2013 Share Posted January 31, 2013 "Olesius -Matrix R&D has chosen to disable points for this submission." => There are not supposed to be points for these submissions I completely know that but they didn`t chosen to disable points! some of old low point results are disable automatically for poins for sure no one try to bench for 2 poins then choose disable points Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Crew Olesius Posted January 31, 2013 Crew Share Posted January 31, 2013 (edited) You are too late! This stage of the competition is no longer accepting submissions since in fact, i do not have access to edit competition results they had points in the past, as i remember... edit: i never choose no point, even for 0.1 hw point results but maybe in rev change/update or other reasons some results change to no point!!!!! Edited January 31, 2013 by Olesius Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
havli Posted January 31, 2013 Share Posted January 31, 2013 http://hwbot.org/competition/team_cup_2012_sc4/stage/630_amd_k6 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GENiEBEN Posted February 4, 2013 Share Posted February 4, 2013 Huh. Do you have that every time? It's a bug indeed, but I wonder why you're the only person reporting it so far Seems like I am not the only one: http://hwbot.org/submission/2352261_schmuckley_pifast_core_2_e6600_(2.4ghz)_21.45_sec He entered 21.45 and it displayed 21.04. I had to edit it to 21.450 to show 21.45. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GENiEBEN Posted February 5, 2013 Share Posted February 5, 2013 (edited) Bug: When you edit some submissions the No Points button is enabled. Happens if you also use the 'Preload last configuration". Haven't noticed if does it only on some benchmarks, but for Aquamark I know it does. Idea: Edited February 8, 2013 by GENiEBEN Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GENiEBEN Posted February 5, 2013 Share Posted February 5, 2013 (edited) Also the screenshot is missing. EDIT: Aquamark 'website' link is invalid: http://hwbot.org/benchmarks/www.tiny.cc/hwbotaqua Should be: http://www.tiny.cc/hwbotaqua Edited February 5, 2013 by GENiEBEN Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
zzolio Posted February 8, 2013 Share Posted February 8, 2013 there is a bug when going from a user's profile to the National League then it says that the leading National is The Fastest overclocker of the World http://hwbot.org/league/enthusiast?offset=-9&countryCode=DK Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Devroush Posted February 8, 2013 Share Posted February 8, 2013 Aquamark 'website' link is invalid: http://hwbot.org/benchmarks/www.tiny.cc/hwbotaqua Should be: http://www.tiny.cc/hwbotaqua Links fixed. MY BAD. Other issues: looking into it. Keep them coming, it'll be 2 weeks of bugfixing . Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Devroush Posted February 8, 2013 Share Posted February 8, 2013 Btw, if somebody was wondering, yes some avatars are broken. If you uploaded your avatar using IE7 it'll probably be broken. I'll try to fix it though. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Crew Strunkenbold Posted February 8, 2013 Crew Share Posted February 8, 2013 Dont know if this has reported before, but anyway it should be a quick one. On every benchmark page (like wprime 32) with "Overclock record overview", the displayed position of the personal best is the position of the user in the specific hardware ranking not in the global ranking. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
K404 Posted February 8, 2013 Share Posted February 8, 2013 I'm trying to follow a user (Scooter.Jay) but whenever i try to follow him, I get an error message. I can follow other users no problem. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GENiEBEN Posted February 8, 2013 Share Posted February 8, 2013 (edited) When editing a score with RAM/HDD Manufacturer empty the field autofills with 'AMD'. EDIT: Some pagination bug: Edited February 9, 2013 by GENiEBEN Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
K404 Posted February 10, 2013 Share Posted February 10, 2013 Is there a way to code pages so that they "know" what benchmarks will run on a certain piece of hardware and display the appropriate benchmarks? I mean..... Associating a category with DX8/9/10/11 functionality. it was "bad" after 3D11 was added, but now with another 4x 3DMark13 categories, older cards have more blank space in their benchmark list than filled random DX9 choice: Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GENiEBEN Posted February 10, 2013 Share Posted February 10, 2013 One more: Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Devroush Posted February 10, 2013 Share Posted February 10, 2013 It's Turrican, apparently his forum account wasn't linked to his hwbot account. http://hwbot.org/submission/2220521 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
knopflerbruce Posted February 11, 2013 Share Posted February 11, 2013 Is there a way to code pages so that they "know" what benchmarks will run on a certain piece of hardware and display the appropriate benchmarks? I mean..... Associating a category with DX8/9/10/11 functionality. it was "bad" after 3D11 was added, but now with another 4x 3DMark13 categories, older cards have more blank space in their benchmark list than filled random DX9 choice: Good idea. And the same should go for # of sockets (like Opteron 1xxx chips should only have single socket as an option). Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GENiEBEN Posted February 11, 2013 Share Posted February 11, 2013 Because the CPU name is too long the frequency is not visible anymore Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Crew Turrican Posted February 11, 2013 Crew Share Posted February 11, 2013 i shortened it, but it's still too long. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Crew Antinomy Posted February 12, 2013 Crew Share Posted February 12, 2013 I've got the stupid "Don't want any points" bug. http://www.hwbot.org/submission/2355341_antinomy_superpi___1m_k6_2_533mhz_4min_38sec_781ms If I logout I can see that "Antinomy does not participate in the HWBOT rankings for points. " How did this checkbox get checked in the first way? I didn't check it. Why is it enabled by default despite the checkbox "I do not wish to participate in the HWBOT rankings." in my account is unchecked? That's the first dumb thing. Then I go to my submission, edit it and uncheck the "I don't want to participate in rankings" for this submission. Save changes, recalculate and... nothing. If I logout it shows that the submission still doesn't participate in rankings. I have the not participate enabled by default (better enable the read rules checkbox) and I can't edit it. Can I please have the other way around? Meaning - disabled "not participate" and no way to enable it by editing? Thank you in advance. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Devroush Posted February 12, 2013 Share Posted February 12, 2013 (edited) You don't get any points because for the enthusiast league, you need to provide a picture of your system, so that we can verify that you didn't use extreme cooling. I understand that you probably didn't pour liquid nitrogen on that K6, but well, those are the rules . edit: oh you were right, there was a little bug that it showed "does not participate in ranking for points" when you logged out. That's fixed now. Edited February 12, 2013 by Devroush Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GENiEBEN Posted February 12, 2013 Share Posted February 12, 2013 You don't get any points because for the enthusiast league, you need to provide a picture of your system, so that we can verify that you didn't use extreme cooling. I understand that you probably didn't pour liquid nitrogen on that K6, but well, those are the rules . Hmm, you get points without picture too, they just don't go into the 'top 15' personal subs that rank you in the league. What he says is correct, when you edit some subs the No Points checkbox is activated for some odd reason. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Farjam Posted February 12, 2013 Share Posted February 12, 2013 hi i found a funny bug(not really important but it exists) first i saw that "you lost 6.38 point and your 3dmark05 rank with 5850 changed from 2 to 3" http://8pic.ir/images/pmvf5l16emwxvjlfi7zu.jpg but when i saw the ranking i'm still 2nd in that ranking http://8pic.ir/images/0j690usplynd2sajvle.jpg the second "but" when i open my score link i see that "the rank is 3th but the point is correct for 2nd place" http://8pic.ir/images/lppbm0oi5l7wi5g0rk9.jpg not big problem for me but i like to know how? sombdy benched and died aftar that? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.