sofos1990 Posted September 9, 2013 Posted September 9, 2013 L315B371 is bad on LN2 at least mine. 1m at 6100 max with 1.9. Testing the 407 now... Quote
Crew Vivi Posted September 9, 2013 Crew Posted September 9, 2013 nice scaling 4670k's Dz! sofos what did the 6.1 do on air 5g? Quote
Andrix85 Posted September 9, 2013 Posted September 9, 2013 L315B371 is bad on LN2 at least mine. 1m at 6100 max with 1.9.Testing the 407 now... Every cpu, also same batch, dosn't scale as other...You must have luck... For example my L313B991 does 5.7 ghz max, Froxic cpu 6.1. Quote
sofos1990 Posted September 9, 2013 Posted September 9, 2013 (edited) No air testing on this one Goddy. The 407 does 6.3 05 with 1.75 and it boots with 1.35 at 5G. It doesn't scale well with voltage and the cb is -120C. On the 371 the cb is at -100C. I believe that we should search for LN2 scaling cpus and not for a specific batch. I had L312 and L309 but no luck. Edited September 9, 2013 by sofos1990 Quote
Andrix85 Posted September 9, 2013 Posted September 9, 2013 No air testing on this one Goddy. The 407 does 6.3 05 with 1.75 and it boots with 1.35 at 5G. It doesn't scale well with voltage and the cb is -120C. On the 371 the cb is at -100C. I believe that we should search for LN2 scaling cpus and not for a specific batch. I had L312 and L309 but no luck. Yes Sofos...For Haswell the batch isn't important...The voltage is the key to konw if it scales... Quote
Crew Vivi Posted September 9, 2013 Crew Posted September 9, 2013 No air testing on this one Goddy. The 407 does 6.3 05 with 1.75 and it boots with 1.35 at 5G. It doesn't scale well with voltage and the cb is -120C. On the 371 the cb is at -100C. I believe that we should search for LN2 scaling cpus and not for a specific batch. I had L312 and L309 but no luck. L310B488/489/491 L311B512 L312B515 all these are proven scaling batches, meaning even at 1.4v you will reach atleast 6.2 on 2 cores, batches will always be a strange thing, but these above are sure "great probability batches" which mean IF you find a cpu with low v 5g, your changes are good that you can get a high clock IF your cb goes to about -120. sofos that -100 6.1 cpu would probly do 6.3 aswell at -120 right? This side scaling happens huuuge after -100 onward to -120 XA and i have bought tons of cpu's and we can guarantee that buying blindly is not as good as buying these tried batches Quote
Crew Leeghoofd Posted September 10, 2013 Crew Posted September 10, 2013 Found some more dud 4670K CPUs 1.4Vcore set in Bios, Loadline high... needed to post and pass CPU Queen test in AIDA L307B070 35250064A0328 4600 L307B070 3524905A2691 4500 L307B088 35250064A1809 4500 L307B088 35250064A2289 4700 L307B088 3524905A0097 4600 L311B438 35308487A0438 4600 L311B438 35308253A1837 4600 L311B438 35308487A2154 4600 L314B011 2L311030A1179 4800 L314B011 2L311030A2737 4700 L314B011 2L311030A2737 4600 L314B011 2L311030A1330 4700 about 15 more to follow tomorrow, sadly all of the same batches Really weird CPUs these Haswells sigh Quote
Crew Vivi Posted September 11, 2013 Crew Posted September 11, 2013 Found some more dud 4670K CPUs 1.4Vcore set in Bios, Loadline high... needed to post and pass CPU Queen test in AIDA L307B070 35250064A0328 4600 L307B070 3524905A2691 4500 L307B088 35250064A1809 4500 L307B088 35250064A2289 4700 L307B088 3524905A0097 4600 L311B438 35308487A0438 4600 L311B438 35308253A1837 4600 L311B438 35308487A2154 4600 L314B011 2L311030A1179 4800 L314B011 2L311030A2737 4700 L314B011 2L311030A2737 4600 L314B011 2L311030A1330 4700 about 15 more to follow tomorrow, sadly all of the same batches Really weird CPUs these Haswells sigh maaan thats bad.. almost feels like 4670k are the bad performing 4770k in the factory Quote
der8auer Posted September 11, 2013 Posted September 11, 2013 Yes that's why I gave up buying 4670Ks. They were even worse than my 4770Ks haha. So far almost tested 20 Chips and the highest I got was 6,3 validated and ~6,0 benchstable. Ivy was a lot easier to bin. Quote
komatsu Posted September 11, 2013 Posted September 11, 2013 you are saying i4770k was even worse than i3770k but i wonder how did the world record holders reach 7.0 ghz with trying only 20 cpu? Quote
Guest Bullant Posted September 11, 2013 Posted September 11, 2013 Hi guys,just wondering if anyone has tried this batch L311B516? I notice Vivi said L311B512 is ok Thanks Quote
jjjc Posted September 11, 2013 Posted September 11, 2013 Depends on how lucky you are. I got my gem chip after just 5 attempts, pure luck. 6.85ghz validate and 6.5+ in some benches. Quote
Crew Vivi Posted September 11, 2013 Crew Posted September 11, 2013 Hi guys,just wondering if anyone has tried this batch L311B516? I notice Vivi said L311B512 is okThanks yea man go for it, NameGT did 311B516 and it was scaling batch, so you in the right zone Quote
Guest Bullant Posted September 11, 2013 Posted September 11, 2013 Depends on how lucky you are. I got my gem chip after just 5 attempts, pure luck. 6.85ghz validate and 6.5+ in some benches. I'm feeling lucky yea man go for it, NameGT did 311B516 and it was scaling batch, so you in the right zone Thanks Vivi,shop had 2 chips 2 batches last week hopefully the L311B is not sold Quote
nedernakker Posted September 11, 2013 Posted September 11, 2013 (edited) tested a 4770K yesterday 314B528 Won't even do Cinebench at 5.0 under my SS @ -50 jikes... that's like the worst of the worst chips Edit: Got access to: L314B506 L316B295 L316B289 any thoughts on those? Edited September 11, 2013 by nedernakker Quote
subaruwrc Posted September 11, 2013 Posted September 11, 2013 L251A899 4670K ES - 1.35v 4800 2c/2t 32m Ok, 1.575v 4900mhz FAIL. oh my .. Quote
nedernakker Posted September 11, 2013 Posted September 11, 2013 I know, But there aren't any around. contacted another shop. But witheverybody testing older batches we might miss the new good newer batches... (I guess) Quote
Crew Leeghoofd Posted September 11, 2013 Crew Posted September 11, 2013 (edited) Last 4770K set I got to bin today, at least one CPU that does 5Ghz at 1.385Vcore... 4500 1.175 for daily stability on Noctua NH12 All boot 4/8 in windows7 and complete an AIDA PhotoworXX test First xxxxMhz are at 1.4Vcore, second xxxxMHz (if tested) is at 1.35Vcore L314B011 2L311030A1343 4800 4700 L314B011 2L311030A1855 4900 4800 L314B506 2L316291A2153 4700 4700 L314B506 2L316291A1439 5000 4900 L314B506 2L316291A1900 4800 L314B506 2L316291A1922 4800 4700 L314B506 2L316291A0969 4900 4800 L314B506 2L316291A0927 4800 L314B506 2L316291A4575 4700 4700 L314B506 2L316291A4611 4800 4700 L316B432 35310047A1952 4900 4900 6000MHz 1core, 5700 4/8, CB -115°C L316B432 35310047A0503 4900 4800 Edited September 17, 2013 by Leeghoofd Quote
Crew Vivi Posted September 11, 2013 Crew Posted September 11, 2013 goood info Leeg thanks! @nakker, i tried L316B but i got a bad batch, i had around B5xx, maybe B2xx is different Quote
TaPaKaH Posted September 11, 2013 Posted September 11, 2013 Won't even do Cinebench at 5.0 under my SS @ -50Xtreme Addict must be very jealous of you right now, he no longer has "the worst one" Quote
Crew Leeghoofd Posted September 11, 2013 Crew Posted September 11, 2013 Dunno Sam, maybe I can ask to arrange those two 4670K at 1.4Vcore doing just 4500 into windows, no 1M or BSOD Quote
Xtreme Addict Posted September 11, 2013 Posted September 11, 2013 Xtreme Addict must be very jealous of you right now, he no longer has "the worst one" My worst one (no boot 4.2 GHz AIR) was RMAed lol Quote
nedernakker Posted September 11, 2013 Posted September 11, 2013 I ditched this one too. seems like some regular users don't care how bad it clocks I'm thinking now wether to try another one since it can only get better, but I still have my 6100 32m chip, so I guess it's hard to pass that one with current batches.. Quote
Crew Leeghoofd Posted September 11, 2013 Crew Posted September 11, 2013 I hope to breach 6ghz on these ( hopefully ) Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.