Massman Posted June 14, 2013 Posted June 14, 2013 @Massman I would like to know if it's just the official announcement, also if you can provide the finals date. I really need to get this free week to go, so, is important to inform many days before. Thanks in advance. Final date is still to be determined. Not fixed yet. Quote
bartman1973 Posted June 14, 2013 Posted June 14, 2013 Haha submitted a couple of scores as well before may 15 ...lets just hope and see what happens next hmm maybe they can retain people who have scores before may 15 and redraw those entries who won but submitted after may 15 .... Quote
bob(nz) Posted June 15, 2013 Posted June 15, 2013 Haha submitted a couple of scores as well before may 15 ...lets just hope and see what happens next hmm maybe they can retain people who have scores before may 15 and redraw those entries who won but submitted after may 15 .... I agree. Mass man you deleted your original post, but can we assume that the above applies? Ie all the people that you had drawn that did have a legit score posted before May 15th will keep their prize? Not going to be impressed if you turn around now and say that I am not getting a board! Quote
Shrekogre Posted June 15, 2013 Posted June 15, 2013 I also agree the legit scorer should get their lucky draw prize. Quote
Neyasit Posted June 16, 2013 Posted June 16, 2013 I thought only those submitted before 15 may qualify for lucky draw? I thought that winners of lucky draw submitted their score before 15 may Quote
StingerYar Posted June 16, 2013 Posted June 16, 2013 I thought that winners of lucky draw submitted their score before 15 may I can't wait to see results of a new lucky draw Quote
icebob Posted June 16, 2013 Posted June 16, 2013 with my kind of luck, instead of having the GTX 650, I'll end up with nothing! Quote
cyclone Posted June 18, 2013 Posted June 18, 2013 with my kind of luck, instead of having the GTX 650, I'll end up with nothing! don't worry man! there were really few guys who submitted their scores in time for LD so good luck! Quote
The Mutt Posted June 18, 2013 Posted June 18, 2013 And you can count me out, I never win anything. Quote
Massman Posted June 19, 2013 Posted June 19, 2013 Sorry for the delay, here's the final lucky draw Class A: - Redmax -> MSI Z87 MPOWER MAX Motherboard - Dlnwj-oc ->MSI Z87 MPOWER MAX Motherboard - Spyboy48 -> MSI Z87 MPOWER MAX Motherboard Class B: - Calathea -> Z87-GD65 GAMING motherboard - Icebob -> N650Ti TF 2GD5/OC BE - Bartman1973 -> DDR3-2400 PC3-19200 - Shrekogre -> M5S SATA 6Gb/s 2.5” Solid State Drive - The Mutt -> Cooler Master V1000 - Darkvenom -> CM Storm Quick Fire TK & CM Storm Recon Congrats to all and good luck in the next round! Quote
icebob Posted June 19, 2013 Posted June 19, 2013 Massman, first, thank you, and second, how do you proceed for shipping? Quote
Calathea Posted June 19, 2013 Posted June 19, 2013 Can't complain about that lucky draw. Very nice. Now good luck in semi-finals people, see you there! Quote
Shrekogre Posted June 19, 2013 Posted June 19, 2013 And you can count me out, I never win anything. - The Mutt -> Cooler Master V1000 you were saying? Quote
Spyboy48 Posted June 19, 2013 Posted June 19, 2013 Thank you MSi! Thank you Hwbot too! congrats to ALL lucky draw prizes as well! Quote
The Mutt Posted June 19, 2013 Posted June 19, 2013 you were saying? Haha, that's the first time! Thank's alot, I was just thinking of buying a second psu. Quote
Massman Posted June 20, 2013 Posted June 20, 2013 For whoever might be interested in this. So far, the numbers for MOA look quite good. Even though the amount of seats in the grand final reduced significantly from 32 (16x2) to 15, there were slightly more participants this year. We went from 72 to 79. The amount of score submissions almost doubled as the counter is now at 420-ish for the entire MOA campaign. I hope these numbers will provide "upper management" with enough evidence that MOA-type competitions can be organised without spending a rediculous amount of money and still create the same amount of exposure and participance. Just fyi. Quote
redmax Posted June 20, 2013 Posted June 20, 2013 Oh cool! I won something No excuses now I'll have to compete. Congratz to all the winners. Quote
Shrekogre Posted June 20, 2013 Posted June 20, 2013 For whoever might be interested in this. So far, the numbers for MOA look quite good. Even though the amount of seats in the grand final reduced significantly from 32 (16x2) to 15, there were slightly more participants this year. We went from 72 to 79. The amount of score submissions almost doubled as the counter is now at 420-ish for the entire MOA campaign. I hope these numbers will provide "upper management" with enough evidence that MOA-type competitions can be organised without spending a rediculous amount of money and still create the same amount of exposure and participance. Just fyi. I prefer live though. leveled the playing field. Quote
redmax Posted June 20, 2013 Posted June 20, 2013 For whoever might be interested in this. So far, the numbers for MOA look quite good. Even though the amount of seats in the grand final reduced significantly from 32 (16x2) to 15, there were slightly more participants this year. We went from 72 to 79. The amount of score submissions almost doubled as the counter is now at 420-ish for the entire MOA campaign. I hope these numbers will provide "upper management" with enough evidence that MOA-type competitions can be organised without spending a rediculous amount of money and still create the same amount of exposure and participance. Just fyi. Seems like a good thing to me. Really too bad its one person teams but in the end the fame usually goes to one person so its a moot point cept for those looking for a free ride to Taiwan Quote
Xtreme Addict Posted June 20, 2013 Posted June 20, 2013 For whoever might be interested in this. So far, the numbers for MOA look quite good. Even though the amount of seats in the grand final reduced significantly from 32 (16x2) to 15, there were slightly more participants this year. We went from 72 to 79. The amount of score submissions almost doubled as the counter is now at 420-ish for the entire MOA campaign. I hope these numbers will provide "upper management" with enough evidence that MOA-type competitions can be organised without spending a rediculous amount of money and still create the same amount of exposure and participance. Just fyi. This is a good news. Considering the fact that rules aren't still so friendly (even after some changes) (in class A -> Ivy, SB-E, Haswell, 7970 + Titan), it's good that the marketing level is still a bit higher. Class B helped for sure in interest. Next time (if there will be MOA 2014) with better rules (better selection of benchmark, maybe cheaper platforms, maybe better prize distribution/tickets) the popularity can raise much higher. It shows that this format (Class A + Class B) has some potencial. Quote
thebanik Posted June 20, 2013 Posted June 20, 2013 Although there are not many competitions around for comparison but the prizes should be better and more like earlier years of MOA when it was hosted out of hwbot, considering the amount many have to spend on the hardware itself. Quote
Splave Posted June 20, 2013 Posted June 20, 2013 For whoever might be interested in this. So far, the numbers for MOA look quite good. Even though the amount of seats in the grand final reduced significantly from 32 (16x2) to 15, there were slightly more participants this year. We went from 72 to 79. The amount of score submissions almost doubled as the counter is now at 420-ish for the entire MOA campaign. I hope these numbers will provide "upper management" with enough evidence that MOA-type competitions can be organised without spending a rediculous amount of money and still create the same amount of exposure and participance. Just fyi. Funny how not being able to bring a teammate this year increase the number of participants...Might it be because strong teams are now dividing into 2 and both members are submitting hmmm Quote
Xtreme Addict Posted June 20, 2013 Posted June 20, 2013 Funny how not being able to bring a teammate this year increase the number of participants...Might it be because strong teams are now dividing into 2 and both members are submitting hmmm I thought that Massman counted MOA 2012 x2 (two persons as team) Quote
Splave Posted June 20, 2013 Posted June 20, 2013 I think you misunderstood, say you and I are alway teammates. And I know you will make it to final and take me. Why would I bench too? I wouldnt. But now you and I would both have to bench to go. That is why there is more submissions, not because people prefer this format. Quote
Xtreme Addict Posted June 20, 2013 Posted June 20, 2013 But single nicks - entries this year is more 54 users took part in HWBOT MOA 2012, so we can count it as x2 or x1.5 (some of ocers would take wifes, girlfriends and so on) http://www.3dmark.com/competitions/MSI-LOC-2012/ 1500 entries in LOC lol (500 per category, so I guess there was some limit... best 500 results lol) Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.