richba5tard Posted November 14, 2018 Share Posted November 14, 2018 3 hours ago, yosarianilives said: Ranking definitely looks weird, the "70% slower than 1st place" cutoff should be around 15s 258ms by my napkin math It's 75%, not 70%. So score needs to be at least 14s671ms or better to get more points. This 75% cutoff is under discussion for the next revision. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
yosarianilives Posted November 14, 2018 Share Posted November 14, 2018 It's an awkward cutoff for points, no doubt caused by relatively few scores being within the cutoff but definitely lines up with how scoring is supposed to work. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
richba5tard Posted November 15, 2018 Share Posted November 15, 2018 I tend to agree. If I remember correctly the reasoning of massman for the high cut off percentage was that only high effort submissions should be awarded significant amount of points. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Crew Leeghoofd Posted July 5, 2021 Crew Share Posted July 5, 2021 I recalculated them all manually, wasted 2 hours of my time. Only thing I found were 3 subs that were disabled for points, but I found a lot of doubles and even triple submissions... I deleted over 80, subbing and resubbing will not get you more points For the last time: The benchmark point distribution has changed. Catzilla/hwbot Prime gets no more points We moved from Firestrike to Firestrike Extreme ... Your old scores are beaten easily by modern setups, so you get less points ta like a few years back.... You can't come back after 4 years thinking that your points are still the same. Things evolve... For me this case is closed... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.