Submission & member moderation

Sometimes I see scores submitted where the GPU driver info has been very deliberately masked... or tactically masked with the edge of another window. Should this be made illegal?

so i was meaning to submit this result then start a conversation about it ( but the button is removed pretty sure its bugged...GT maybe? .I produced this result 10 times...thoughts? i haven't been following the Maxxmem game..no worries to delete it ...theirs is definitely an issue http://hwbot.org/community/submission/1019675_packet_maxxmem_ddr3_4803.9_marks

Figure.... post up a test run and ask before I put time and dry ice into a score i'd get blocked. This is from a 9800GX2- check the GPU ID code. Everything else is masked in windows to allow the use of 169.21 drivers. Will this be ok? It *should* be, its been discussed before... but I want expecting "8800GTS 512" to appear in ALL the name fields!

hey everyone I found this result (http://hwbot.org/community/submission/1019192_genieben_aquamark_geforce_210_106202_marks ) and i see that he uses a card with ddr3 . It is still a 210 but they are not the same .Should a new chart be created for 210 with ddr3?

This appears to be a 3DMark Vantage score that has been posted in the PCMark Vantage scores: http://hwbot.org/community/submission/1018707_firstchoicett_pcmark_vantage_core_i7_980x_45667_marks

The message is that there are no pionts becuase this is not my highest GTX 480 AM3 score, but as far as i know it is my highest AM3 score for any hardware: http://hwbot.org/community/submission/1018187_ Is there something I need to do to get this corrected or am I missing something? Thanks.

Where to start....... 9 sec on phenom II 550 in spi 1m? Heh ok. Where to start. First 512K was run, second the time is a saved run. Third not even close to realistic. Why is this score even still up. http://hwbot.org/community/submission/1016621_grgan_superpi_phenom_ii_x2_550_be_9sec_0ms

These 3 submissions are from the same computer, motherboard and the same rams...at various SuperPi speeds...with the same screenshots.....being used and submitted by the same team with 3 different user names. Is this even allowed? 1 - http://hwbot.org/community/submission/1014658_lamaocqq_superpi_core_i3_540_8sec_125ms 2 - http://hwbot.org/community/submission/1014729_hanghangaocqq_superpi_core_i3_540_8sec_140ms 3 - http://hwbot.org/community/submission/1014772_juehoaocqq_superpi_core_i3_540_8sec_172ms

Email says submission approved and checked by Thor, but it has been removed? http://hwbot.org/community/submission/1011782_rickss69_superpi_32m_pentium_e6300_2.80ghz_12min_52sec_373ms

wPrime1024M i5-750 on air The submission screenshot shown as 240.515s = over 4 minutes Somehow it got rated for 3min 30sec 120ms and landed in 1st place. That is invalid. Please correct or delete. http://hwbot.org/community/submission/978453_rayhow_wprime_1024m_core_i5_750_3min_30sec_120ms

Have a 555 unlocked to quad, but only seem an option for multiple sockets, not cores. How do I mark it as a quad for wprime?

Is this valid? http://hwbot.org/community/submission/1004372_flanker_cpu_z_phenom_ii_x6_1090t_be_4768.9_mhz Says rejected...

Why no points? http://hwbot.org/community/submission/1009936_rickss69_wprime_32m_core_i3_530_9sec_283ms I don't have one above it... Thanks

http://hwbot.org/community/submission/1009691_q56_monster_3dmark_vantage___performance_geforce_gtx_480_29652_marks I dunno h20 cooled results beating ln2 on cpu and gpu ??? maybe he knows something i dont ???? ________ Justin Bieber Fan

These: http://hwbot.org/community/submission/1005670_bobnova_wprime_1024m_core_2_e4500_2.2ghz_9min_37sec_827ms http://hwbot.org/community/submission/1005671_bobnova_wprime_32m_core_2_e4500_2.2ghz_17sec_693ms I selected 1x e4500, it's saying four threads.

I'm posting everything here because the first email I wrote on that subject, was dated "12 April" and it's a looooong time to check these results. I have no idea of what are you doing guys, it's so difficult to keep in touch with you. So, let's start with that two guys, Team Hardware Forest and Laurus&CoolerM: 8800 GTS 640 http://hwbot.org/community/submission/995978_team_hardware_forest_3dmark_2006_geforce_8800_gts_640_mb_16939_marks http://hwbot.org/community/submission/994732_laurus_3dmark_2006_geforce_8800_gts_640_mb_16935_marks As you can see, same frequencies, same score at 3dmark and the first screenshot is clearly photoshopped... I remember that we …

http://hwbot.org/community/submission/948041_riska_3dmark_vantage___performance_radeon_hd_5770_14859_marks I cant understand wy i am getting all my scores blocked over and over again now this one something about gt2 is to high?? i cant see the problem!!!

Made this submission the other day... http://hwbot.org/community/submission/995121_rickss69_3dmark_vantage___performance_82945g_integrated_graphics_desktop_22_marks?tab=info I have been unable to select the correct graphics category. It should be Intel GMA HD, but it will not accept this input. Can someone modify/edit my submission to reflect what it really is? I am sure I received points for the run when I should not have. Thanks

Both 32 and 1024m.. They were fast but not that fast! Thanks guys!

reported 12.05. ... http://hwbot.org/community/submission/1001932_victorpexacos_3dmark_2003_geforce_6200_le_ddr2_256_mb_2303_marks http://hwbot.org/community/submission/1001525_hxdm4x_3dmark_vantage___performance_geforce_8400_gs_ddr2_pci_g98_734_marks check an shift into the correct category - please

MOD please help me delete this submission that I made a mistake. http://hwbot.org/community/submission/1004254_samsavemax_superpi_32m_core_i7_930_8sec_455ms?tab=info Sorry,

http://hwbot.org/community/submission/929755_touf_hydrofox_pifast_core_2_t6400_2ghz_37.34_sec The writing in the pifast window is different the all the runs I have seen with pifast. There are spaces in the text, which there shouldnt be when hexus pifast is ran. As seen here, http://hwbot.org/blog/wp-content/pifast.jpg Im thinking the run was done without using hexus pifast. There is no way a stock T6400 is going to run it in 37 seconds. The next one at stock 2Ghz is 10 seconds slower. Mine has nearly a 25% overclock, a fresh install, and higher clocked ram, and is a full 2 seconds slower. http://hwbot.org/community/submission/999597_cecil_pifast_core_2_t640…

Hey Guys, I hope this is the right spot for my problem. Yesterday I made two submissions with P3 733 and P3 800. Both should reward me about 3 Points each. After the Submission I waited for the Bot calculating the Score. But after a couple of Hours it still says: "calculating". Today I looked up, expecting some more points on my acc. but those two submissions are still "calculating". So I deleted both, submitted again and got the same problem. Could someone please fix it ? http://hwbot.org/community/submission/1002190_speddy411_superpi_pentium_3_733mhz_1min_56sec_758ms http://hwbot.org/community/submission/1002191_speddy411_superpi_p…

http://hwbot.org/community/submission/891979_riska_3dmark_2006_radeon_hd_4770_21143_marks?tab=info wy is this score blocked?? I did many runs at that speed and got rougly the same points! How can it be bugged? or a cheat?

Another hardware database fix required: http://hwbot.org/hardware/processor/i486dx_40mhz http://hwbot.org/hardware/processor/i486dx4_120mhz Intel never produced such CPUs - the DX40 was made by AMD, Cyrix, UMC, SGS Thomson and Texas Instruments. As for the DX4-120 - only AMD produced such chips. So the letter "i" before the marking is an error. Thank you