Submission & member moderation
Discussion on how results should be monitored, discuss doubtfull results, ...
1641 topics in this forum
-
I've seen this question asked around a number of forums, and I couldn't find anything here. Is it within HWBot's rules to use an ATI card as the main card, with an Nvidia card as a dedicated PPU using the Nvidia PPU drivers? If so, under what conditions? This is just a request for a clarification on the hwbot rules. Thanks. EDIT: And as a specific request for a forum member, if a person is using a 200 series Nvidia card and uses a 8 series Nvidia card as a dedicated PPU, is that within hwbot's rules?
-
- 4 replies
- 1.2k views
- 1 follower
-
-
-
http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=784107 - this score was removed as I didn't include the memory window... which is correct. The problem was that for some reason I couldn't open 2 CPUZ windows at the same time (the other one would never open, after the loading bar was gone nothing came up), and then I decided to only use that CPU window. But I could make a validation, which is also on HWBot (at the exact same clocks as the scores): http://valid.x86-secret.com/show_oc.php?id=434658 The scores should match the memory speed pretty accurately, so if "common sense" is used, I'd say it should be unblocked. At least someone once said that there's no point …
-
- 5 replies
- 1.3k views
-
-
Ok, I have this Leadtek WinFast PX6800 TDH I think I remember buying an LE Ok, But when I run GPU-Z I get this This is a validation after some OC'ing (Using EVGA Precision v3.. funny eh.) http://www.techpowerup.com/gpuz/krzn3/ The GPU comes up as a NV41... and on HWBot an NV41 is an 6800GS.... Not an LE.... I originally posted up my scores on HWBOT as an LE... but then realized the NV41 so I moved them.... But my clocks/scores are no where near what the GS guys are getting, But I was in the low end ball park of the LE guys..... So I am confused as to what I should do..... Put them back as LE or keep them as GS? I did more searching.... LE Cloc…
-
- 7 replies
- 1.2k views
-
-
i have a question, at 15.45hr today i posted couple scores online here, and now for houres i don't get a score, points or ranking, while when i look in benchmarks list, i normally get a point for that scores. Is Hwbot slow today, or are there problems with the hwbot server?
-
- 15 replies
- 2k views
- 1 follower
-
-
Hi, I posted some results for which I should earn points : I earned them for SuperPi, CPU-Z, etc. but nothing for Wprime... Thanks for your answer
-
- 3 replies
- 1.1k views
-
-
I am writing about the current wPrime 1024M World Record. The time seems unusually fast for the clocks reported in submission is it possible to get some more information from this score as there seems to be a huge difference between their scores and everyone elses top score previous to this submission was held by kingpin with CPUs at 5.6GHz dual QX9775 skulltrail. Vince's time was 1m52s current world record is held by leghorn and giorgoprimo with a 1m50s but at 4GHz on CPUs :eek::eek: third fastest time with skulltrail is followed by youngpro at 5.33GHz on CPUs with a time of 2m01s is there something i'm missing here. I know that at least in youngpros …
-
- 5 replies
- 1.5k views
-
-
All these results are in the wrong section : http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=779954 (8800gts) http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=779956 (8800gts) http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=779949 (x1800) http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=779948 (x1800) http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=779947 (x1800) http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=779952 (x1800) http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=779967 (8800gts) http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=779969 (8800gts) http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=779985 (8800gts) http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=720540 (8800gt) http://www.hwbot.org/resul…
-
- 5 replies
- 1.2k views
-
-
Today morning I was with more than 33 points, and now the afternoon simply missing several of my results, and my scores dropped dramatically. What happened?
-
- 8 replies
- 1.5k views
-
-
I whant to know who is deleting scores of me on my profile? and blocking them? What is the problem with it? Everything is by the rules the screenshot, Cpu-Z verification url. Is it forbidden to bench with somebody elses pc? NO, i don't think so. I buy vga's, give them to others memebers for benching, sell them, loan pc of friend, and bech with it. Is this forbidden?? NO so what is the problem that some of my scores are deleted and who of the moderators is deleting them? I even don't get a email WHY it is deleted, no reasen !!!!
-
- 12 replies
- 2k views
-
-
Hi all, I'm Benmaster (team HardwareTest italy) Gomeler says in description of his "WR" pcmark05 : | PCM05 is mine you silly Italians | is very sad no comment... we have no beckup results Our 28,051 is the best test Bye
-
- 9 replies
- 1.5k views
-
-
Hi, i was searching some scores with the X800 GTO AGP and found this: http://hwbot.org/ResultBrowseByVideoCard.do?gpuModelId=1289 i think they were cheating. .. mafri
-
- 9 replies
- 1.9k views
- 1 follower
-
-
hi somebody has deleted my WR for a single 3870 whats wrong? i have done 18K and there is ORB verification as hwbot rules say wheres the problem? some people provide even only the orb link and i have put a screenshot too please help
-
- 29 replies
- 4.4k views
-
-
I know that hwbot does some kind of rounding for the superpi scores. For example (spi1M) 7.301=7.3 and 7.297=7.3 My question. Why should the 7.301 score must be listed in a better place than 7.297 ... just because it was submitted earlier ?
-
- 3 replies
- 1.1k views
- 1 follower
-
-
http://hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=660326 This result is submitted to AGP card's page instead of PCI-E one. For the first sight the problem is very simple and could be solved using "Report entry" button. But it's unactive due to previous moderator's appoving (connected with other type of claim). So i have an offer: maybe "Report" bell should never become gray because there often can be more than one problem with the result? Sorry for poor English.
-
- 2 replies
- 1.1k views
-
-
That's right... I said your name and your cheating... Do you spend all your time Checking everyone of my submissions? I've submitted every piece of evidence requested by HWbot for submissions and now you accuse me of cheating... You spent your time hating on my Vantage score because of PhysX... which is nothing but a Modified driver for Nvidia Users btu since they can't make it for your ATI cards you choose to hate on it... but I was fine with that... but you saying I'm cheating with my results has taken the cake... and if anyone who has any power reads this, he should be stopped and striped of any power he has... because I don't cheat or never have... all my submissions …
-
- 8 replies
- 1.8k views
-
-
how is this possible? an other member has a lower score as me he has 92000 and i have 93300 score on 3dmark03, and he get plenty more points for it? He gets 23 points and i get 7 points???? how is this possible? here are the two links : http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=781560 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=781556
-
- 3 replies
- 1.1k views
-
-
http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=775847 I reported it; I changed it and it changed back; I reported it again. What do I have to do to change the post so it recognizes "This is a Katmai PIII, not the much rarer and less competitive Coppermine PIII class?" It's not that I don't like the points, but it isn't fair to people who actually have those to bench.
-
- 1 reply
- 912 views
-
-
Just wondering how these are approved. One submission in the top 5 9800GX2 that seems legit is by Mayk. His QX9650 @ 4950mhz socres 20062 cpu points - That seems legit. On the other hand, some others in the top five are lesser chips, clocked way lower and are scoring as much as 40000 cpu points. Maybe I'm wrong, but I can't see how these are not using physx: http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=777557 - Q6600 @ 4104mhz = 39,186 cpu points? Gold medal? http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=777295 - Q6700 @ 3099mhz = 32,598 cpu points? Not trying to be a bitch or a rat, but it's a waste of time for me to submit legit scores until…
-
- 6 replies
- 1.4k views
-
-
Screen shots aren't working out . Top 5 all Physx - 1. http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=774816 - Q6600 @ 3870 = 41802 & Gold? 2. http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=766210 - E8500 @ 4892 = 39485 & Silver? 3. http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=759800 - Forumpost with no orb subm. or screen shot - Q6600 @ 3600 = 8539 & Bronze? 4. http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=771301 - Q66 @ 3924 = 40502 & Medal? 5. http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=775057 - Q6700 @ 3750 = 38557 & Medal? This doesn't even address anything beyond top five and I'm sure there are many more. Here's a legit one I submitt…
-
- 5 replies
- 1.1k views
-
-
It is about these scores... http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=767928 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=774236 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=774309 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=767926 4 times resolution is hidden, i didnt know this was so important, so i will hunt some scores so everyone gets frustrated.... but if you put some comon sense into the equation, you know those scores are done on the proper resolution i just took screenshots, any 3Dmarks places the score in front of the resolution, i didnt realize, it has to be shown is there any solution for this problem? because i cannot redo some scores
-
- 14 replies
- 2.3k views
-
-
Hi there, I was benching last night, and put some results up which were scored. When I looked this evening though, they have been removed and it says that there isnt enough verification for them. http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=779277 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=779261 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=779131 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=779101 I used CPU-z and GPU-z to show the relevant data, and also used the compare link on ORB, so can someone explain why they have been removed from my scores please? Thanks StuartPB
-
- 1 reply
- 1.2k views
-
-
Please recheck the following results.I fixed the errors and are valid for points now..... http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=774140 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=761944 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=774144
-
- 1 reply
- 898 views
-
-
SuperPi - 0 sec - ****** (** *******) 119.5 points - [ inspect ] Processor: Core 2 E6300 (1.86G... @ 1866mhz [#1 Core 2 E6300 (1.86Ghz) in SuperPi] on air [ view screenshot ] Videocard: unknown Memory: 2048MB DDR2 PC6400 @ 400mhz CL5.0 5-5-15 Motherboard: P35 Platinum Global Rank: 1st - 104.5 points Hardware Rank: 1st Core 2 E6300 (1.86Ghz) - 15.0 points Description: SuperPi Run Verfication: no verification image or link found. Scan date: 19-09-2008 08:51 * 1st in global rank SuperPi * 1st in global rank Core 2 E6300 (1.86Ghz!!!) - 15.0 points lol this is very funny...
-
- 1 reply
- 1.1k views
-
-
2900 Pro http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=736232 http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=714917 same team, same gpu cluck, the same with all other 3dmarks
-
- 6 replies
- 1.4k views
-