Submission & member moderation

Maybe a silly question, mostly ment for one moderator who's always darn fast at spotting things Jmke, that'll be you I'd like to see if its possible to gain 1000 marks in a week... Without any ultra highend fancy stuff such as skulltrail... What it will take is: Making a team Making multiple profiles Uploading with each HW configuration: Dualcore scores Quadcore scores Single GFX Multiple GFX In order for everything to count to global... Lets say, quad making 7.93s SPI 1M, and 8:30 min 32M While dual make 7.7s and 7:55 min - if both get added to global, it will be easy... Will playing around for 1 week be accepted...? Please Then after tha…

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=686076 times ago i did this result but now you delede it because its not 1.55 when i upload that result wprime 1,55 doenst exited... so i lse the result ?

Hello everybody... I'm pretty stunned that there is still a SPi 1.4 result holding a record ... And above all it is already marked as "been moderated by the hwbot crew, and can no longer be reported" ... I don't care if I am the first or not but there are some certain "Rules for online submissions." that clearly specify the version of SuperPi to be used : Thanks in advance.

Hey guys, just wanting to know when new rules will be ready? 'Cause it's really funny when I get a score blocked after almost a year for "hardware sharing", knowing that those new rules should come up any moment now. And I also get a "final warning" message...What's that about when it comes to scores from 1 year ago? So? Any progress with those?

Sorry if this is posted in the wrong place , or if its up to the score poster to catch the mistake, but I found this entry and as you can see from the screen shot the poster put in a decimal point http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=711974

I had 133 submited results, but now i have 99,(I not deleted) my points have fallen to bottom I dont have results with superPi and anothers bench Why I dont have results?? sory for my english

HI.I found two same scores: spi1m 13.781s (E6300) http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=620238 3.6points vs spi1m 13.782s (E6300) http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=564939 4.0points I don't mind of 0.4points I just want to know why it's like that Thanks

As title say, why all my 3d mark scores of yesterday has been deleted? http://www.xtremesystems.org/forums/showthread.php?t=190366

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=697582 This result was modered and it's not showing CPU-Z... is right?

Hi I am writting because I find on hwbot scores with my screens. User http://www.hwbot.org/user.do?userId=15029 stole my screen from my on-line auction http://www.allegro.pl/item357859185_357859185.html he set on hwbot score on CPU-Z, SPI 1M and 32M with my screens. I think that he is cheater and I have request to moderator or admin to block this resoult or user. THX

Please look at this scores by Ross (OC Forums) in GeForce 7900 GT category: http://hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=739542 http://hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=739556 http://hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=739547 http://hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=739539 http://hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=739546 Quote from forum post http://www.ocforums.com/showpost.php?p=5642214 Yes, 3dmark03 don't let you to publish score if it's done with mipmap. 3dmark03 score more than 2k higher than normal, even for this high clocks on videocard. Almost 40k GFX score in AM3 is also impossible with this clocks and without mipmap.

Here are the Pentium M Celeron: http://www.hwbot.org/browseHardwareProcessors.do?cpuSubFamilyId=20 I don't know if there will be a Celeron 550 LGA775 any time in the future, but the results here are definetively not LGA775, but Pentium M Celeron 550. So please create Pentium M Celeron 550-category and move the results. Thx!

Look at this: http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=734236 The result is extremely high for this processor (68% higher than second place score), and there is no verification at all. Although, "claim" button is unactive because the result was moderated. What`s the matter?

Hello, user jmke has blocked my 8800 GT 512 MB WR, because the Screen don't shows the Resolution of the Benchmark. For me it is new that the Res. must shown in Screen... sorry for this, but 5 Mates of our Team have seen this run on LN2-Session. And if you look @ Card Clockrates and CPU Clock you can confirm that my Score is realy true! http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=720626 Please check and let me know!

Those scores does not comply to the new rules which forces users to show the subtest results. Nothing personal, KtP, but the moderator's explanation was 'score not suspicious'. How come it isn't? Many runs with similiarly clocked cards (obvious in 3DM03) get much lower results, no ORB or subtest provided, but moderators are still claiming there's nothing suspicious. So, even by box-checking that you agree to the new rules doesn't mean a crap around here? http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=741315 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=741316 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=741317 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=741320

Can you guys please take a look at those scores. Those entries are in the wrong category. The category is Duron 800Mhz Spitfire core, and those are Mobile Duron 800Mhz Morgan core. http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=676601 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=727869 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=725167 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=725169 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=733659 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=735260 Can you move them to the right category. Nusse

Well- I called you out in public so its only fair I apologise in the same way- I more or less accused you of cheating with the 7800GTX. I put the time into understanding how to get the best from the card and now I know you werent. Sorry for the accusation Kenny

Hey I had a score blocked a week or so ago becuase I didn't realise I would be in the Top20 and require a orb link...so I've added one. Can you unblock the score please http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=738428 Thanks a lot! Rich

We all know crossfireX isn't suported on windows XP, but I see results posted as 2 x 3870X2 crossfireX and in there screen shot it shows they are running Windows XP. Is this this ok? I mean I could run 01 or AM3 in XP with 2 x 3870X2's and get a way better score than having to use vista to actually be running 2 cards, not just having the 2nd card sitting there doing nothing.....

Hi mods My score's with a Pentium 3 Celeron 633 are still not scanned: http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=738944 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=738945 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=738946 Normally the are scanned after a hour or 2 max. I've uploaded these score's at 2 o'clock and are still not scanned. Thanks in advance Tim

Hello, this results seems weird... http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=724540 There is no information about the GPU used and also we don't see which resolution was used. If a proof of a high overclock of the CPU was given I could believe this score... but no screenshot the CPU... I think it has been submitted at the wrong place. Thanks for your huge work!

Seen as Im getting scores blocked due to 'insufficient verification for rankings', thought i'd have a look around for myself. The following need addressing :- http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=680633 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=728248 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=698212 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=709494 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=699937 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=701472 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=679390 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=677885 Thats just a quick run down from the top 20 in Single card and SLI... I know some of the results have validation links, bu…

I submit my score: 7,953 and here is the message which I have "Duplicate warning. You already have submitted a benchmark run with exactly the same properties. To prevent duplicates, we have not saved this entry. To view the duplicate result, click here." Why I have this message?? The screen: http://img91.imageshack.us/img91/8871/foxroxorhh3.png ank you in advance

For instance - 8400GS Aquamark3 run - http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=722059 - Bwanasoft scores pretty darn high with very low clock speeds - after careful observation of GPU-z, i spotted a very weird "Bandwidth" - twice as high as it should be at these memory frequencies on one 64-bit memory channel. If that's true, bwanasoft's 8400GS memory should run @ 926MHz (DDR-1852). - Secondly, Pixel & Texel Fillrate are way off! Before you start with excuses such as "yeah, GPU-z lies" i give you my result with pretty much higher frequencies with the SAME GPU-z version and it shows both bandwith & fillrate correctly. Here: http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resu…

As jmke said the other day "the moderation tool works great and so does reporting use it" http://www.hwbot.org/forum/showpost.php?p=19968&postcount=1948 So i did but nothing seems to change. Have a look at this and at the attachment: http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=732469 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=732526 ,these results are in the wrong category,i reported them but still there. He had a 3Dmark03 result in 82845G category which i reported is well and moved by his team captain in to the correct category,but not the Aquamark and 3Dmark06 result.And a 3Dmark05 result which i don't know where is gone. Also my AquaMark results been bl…