Support

While HWbot "knows" R9 Fury and Fury X models, the Fury Nano had been annouced and the specs are no longer under NDA So maybe the card should get recodnized by HWbot? I prepared nice image for it Thanks for keeping HWbot up to date :celebration:

Hello, i`m trying to add some results but can't. After pressing Upload button its starting some endless uploading & white page then. I`m from Ukraine, not only me also have this trouble. Help plz.

HWbot does recognize Asus TXP4 mainboard: http://hwbot.org/hardware/motherboard/txp4/ ...but not the "-X" version, witch is no revision bump, but entierly different mobo: Asus TXP4: Asus TXP4-X: Pictures taken from manuals, I provide later better picture of the overal mobo for HWbot image support, this one is ughly, I photograph it better! Manuals are there to check, how different these two are: Asus TXP4-X manual: http://www.mediafire.com/?ty8a172cb0thmoa ( http://depositfiles.com/files/i6aq82fzm - https://mega.co.nz/#!eRVEDDCC!zhO6dKpzmBTn3ZoytyRaC-OaSjZE6MyC5qnEhEzWD5I ) Asus TXP4 manual: http://www.mediafire.com/?1sds42nqtnn7jpq ( http://dep…

That ram maker do exist, so HWbot better recognize it:

In submission of the x265 HWbot test: http://hwbot.org/submission/2959296_ ...I set the 9VJL3 Chaintech mainboard, but it it not accepted. I edit the score and same result - for some reason, HWbot did not attach the score to the right mainboard - the suggestion for the 9VJL3 never come up - so pls fix not only the score, but the mainboard suggestion/detection. Thanks!

Hi, i have a sager notebook with this specs: Windows 10 Pro 64-bit CPU Intel Core i7 4790K @ 4.00GHz 61 °C Haswell 22nm RAM 24,0GB Dual Channel DDR3 @ 798MHz (11-11-11-28) Motherboard Notebook P770ZM (SOCKET 0) Graphic Generic PnP Monitor (1920x1080@60Hz) 2047MBNVIDIA GeForce GTX 970M (CLEVO/KAPOK Computer) here in HWBOT say unknown motherboard and i can't get a good XTU profile for quick oc, it will be great if somebody could help me

Both the Fury and Fury X are listed as having a stock clock of 1100mhz. The actual clocks are 1050 for the Fury X and 1000 for the Fury.

please add radeon x800xl http://radeon.ru/reference/cards/x800xl/

on page no:12 against my name wizerty image is shown. kindly replace with my image. pl.correct the following errors as well. genieben --indian flag instead of uk flag. rasaparthe--us flag instead of canada flag.

Around CPU-Z 1.70 CPU-Z has finally fixed detection for Slot A Argon, Pluto and Orion CPUs. Also see my verification with Athlon 700Mhz Argon Core 0,25µm which is in our db currently listed as Pluto. See also Kotoris sub which is incorrectly named by CPU-Z as Pluto while it should be an Argon. Rename: Athlon 500Mhz (Slot, Pluto) to Athlon 500Mhz (Slot, Argon) Athlon 550Mhz (Slot, Orion) to Athlon 550Mhz (Slot, Pluto) Athlon 550Mhz (Slot, Pluto) to Athlon 550Mhz (Slot, Argon) Athlon 600Mhz (Slot, Orion) to Athlon 600Mhz (Slot, Pluto) Athlon 600Mhz (Slot, Pluto) to Athlon 600Mhz (Slot, Argon) Athlon 650Mhz (Slot, Orion) to Athlon 600Mhz (Slot, Pluto) Athlon …

GeForce FX 5200 have no image: http://hwbot.org/hardware/videocard/geforce_fx_5200/ That call for fix (nicest image I managed to find, there are plenty of crazy variants, tough) Thanks! :celebration:

Mac-35C1E88140C3E6CF Socket: Socket 1168 BGA chipset: HM87 http://valid.canardpc.com/m7p53r

This is funny mistake: http://hwbot.org/submission/2506941_gslashg_xtu_core_i5_3570k_434_marks An intel core i5 3570K @ 3800MHz CPU on Jetway V600DAP Socket A mainboard I have no idea what the hell happend, but clearly it should be moved to apropriate mainboard. V600DAP cannot use Intel processors, much less i5 (even it might be cool, it just is not happening )

After clicking on Submit, the browser directs to this page then just hangs: http://hwbot.org/submit/create I've waited as long as an hour to see if it will load, I've clicked on Refresh, cleared the cache, tried different computers with different web browsers and always the same thing. Any ideas? Thanks.

Guys, I checked the Contribute page and find out two errors there: http://hwbot.org/article/contribute 1) Local Representatives: Aerou is not from Colombia, but from Czech republic (quite different region) 2) Site Translation: Wizerty Translator (FR) is mentioned twice. I did not want to doubt his work, not at all, I just think that this is error and people should not be mentioned twice... All in all, great job! :nana: :celebration:

By browsing my Hardware Library, I discovered plenty of my errors when entering the hardware. I aim to correct them all, but... a problem happens. To be precise, two major ones: http://hwbot.org/user/trodas/#Hardware_Library 1) at the memory tab, it claims that I have some DDR3 Mushkin rams. This is not true, it is probably a remnant after the "DDR3 by default" bug, but I should check it better... so anyway, there is: Mushkin DDR3 SDRAM - 1 Mushkin DDR3 SDRAM Enhanced - 1 So I hoped, that by clicking on the "1" I get link to the one test, where I have wrongly entered DDR3 rams and I fix it. But no! I get full pages full of results: http://url.hwbot.org/1Mh…

ECS KT600-A do not have any image: http://hwbot.org/hardware/motherboard/kt600_8237/ I sadly cannot find anything better, but maybe someone can... later: http://www.ecs.com.tw/ECSWebSite/Product/Product_Detail.aspx?DetailID=360&MenuID=24&LanID=0 http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16813135143 http://akebonotown.com/bouken/pc_KT600A.htm Thanks!

Great GeForce 6800 GT AGP is not recognized by any image! That is wrong... http://hwbot.org/hardware/videocard/geforce_6800_gt_agp/ So I looked for quality image that represent the card best and that is it, took me plenty of time to retouch it to white background: Hopefully no-one will want to remove the sticker... right? At least it give some nice colors and at the size, it will NOT be reasable at all

I just checked and in *shock* realized, that GTX 970 and GTX 980 have no image on HWbot! WTF! That call for fix. http://hwbot.org/hardware/videocard/geforce_gtx_970/ At first I was like - well, I have to be objective and choose generic nVidia image to not side with some company (or being accused to do so). But upon checking the nVidia images there: http://www.geforce.com/sites/default/files-world/NVIDIA-GeForce-GTX-970-front.png http://www.geforce.com/sites/default/files-world/NVIDIA-GeForce-GTX-980-front.png I come to realize that these pictures are fakes. There is only the "7" chaging to "8" and each other pixel(s) are the same. So these nVidia images I did not …

A very nice nVidia GTX 980 ti card don't have any image: http://hwbot.org/hardware/videocard/geforce_gtx_980_ti/ Because this is currently sold hardware, HWbot team probably want stock original image to represent, so there it is: ...it is no secret that I would like to see there the much nicer image to represent such HW, for example the MSI GTX 980 ti is very nicely looking... ...but I have to leave it for HWbot team to pick the representing image

It would be nice when searching for a chip to be able to use Chrome's integrated search as shown in the image below. Is this an easy fix? To access this, once Chrome predicts the site, you just hit TAB.

Quadro4 100 NVS PCI http://www.techpowerup.com/gpudb/1461/quadro4-100-nvs-pci.html Thanks

Please add Intel Overdirive83Mhz Socket3 (PODP5V83) CPU

Please check if there is a problem with uploading GPUPI results aka datafiles, I get "unable to decrypt datafile" even on results I uploaded previously. Might be a problem on my side, but I have doubts about this

Searching HWBot.org for "ASRock 775i65G" yield NO results. Yet the board is know for HWbot: http://ww.w.hwbot.org/hardware/motherboard/775i65g/ ...and even when the link suggest that "ASRock 775i65g" should be "searchable", it is NOT. In fact, the mainboard page does not return searches for: ASRock 775I65G ASRock 775i65g 775i65G 775I65G ... So I welcome anyone to show me, how this search is supposed to work, when it does not at all. Pls fix?