Jump to content

Crime room

Here you can post any information on OC-related crimes.

  1. Why are the deleted scores and accounts used by the deity to upload to their HWBOT account for verification!? When everyone is an idiot, they can't see it? Both scores have been deleted? Then the original 21st score was deleted and the 19th score was actually the same person! The 19th avatar account was deleted~ but she used the score to upload it with the warned deity! This is also possible ? Attached two pictures, it is obvious that the grades that were warned were uploaded that were originally deleted!!!! Please investigate and make the most severe punishment. Obviously, the grades that were warned are useless and the deleted grades are used to verify!

      • Like
    • 4 replies
    • 1.2k views
  2. https://hwbot.org/submission/4480326_slhogg_xtu_core_i7_6950x_130700_marks Given #1 ranking in Global scores...with an XTU of 130,700 o_O That's also 12.7x the next Global ranker. All [supposedly] managed with an i7 6-series @3830mHz.

    • 7 replies
    • 1.3k views
  3. Started by sdurazzo,

    I have watched Rbuass's video (Drop the bomb), and regardless he did not accuse any overclocker, I would like to ask respectful about scores bellow. Can someone explain how it is possible? Fire Strike Extreme 1st (KP) 14333 http://www.3dmark.com/fs/6340698 GPU 1856 / 2170 Mhz CPU 5710 Mhz 2nd Rbuass 13674 http://www.3dmark.com/3dm/9320519 GPU 1924 / 2168 CPU 5932 Rbuass is using a Rampage 5, which is a recognized great board, and has the CPU 222 MHz stronger (even higher VRAM and NB) with 70 Mhz more on the video card. How is possible to score almost 700 points higher? What kind of Tweak? …

  4. Started by K404,

    Category: http://hwbot.org/hardware/videocard/geforce_6800_256mb_ddr3/ My suspicion: He has an FX3540 and has tweaked Rivatuner or driver detection to look like a 6800 GDDR3. The spec of the two cards is "the same." Why I think that: His default clocks match a 3450, not a 6800 His BIOS version matches a 3450, not a 6800. His card shows up as nVidia reference, with BIOS version .43.05 but Dewa_OC also has a reference card and his BIOS version is .49.02. Least damning- he has also submitted scores with an FX3450 If nothing is conclusive and nothing can be done, i'll cope. I can beat his scores anyway

  5. Started by K404,

    wytiwx Celeron 347: 8398MHz! (FSB: 365!!!) Celeron 356: 8312MHz Celeron 352: 8228MHz Celeron 360: 8169MHz Celeron 365: 8065MHz All submitted in the space of a few weeks, from random batches no-one else has success with. I no longer believe in his scores. There were......25? people in the netburst 8GHz club, then this guy comes along with all these scores? i3 540: 280.7 BCLK?? The bigger problem: this guy might have found a way to hack CPU-Z validation.

  6. Started by K404,

    http://hwbot.org/submission/2331256_hibble_cpu_frequency_fx_4320_8246.23_mhz http://hwbot.org/submission/2330248_luebke_cpu_frequency_fx_4320_8122.4_mhz Same team, same picture of computer, same mobo, unreleased? hardware.

  7. Started by K404,

    His 9800GT 3D06 http://hwbot.org/submission/2253449_stelaras_3dmark06_geforce_9800_gt_25501_marks 2850MHz shader His 9800GT 3D01 http://hwbot.org/submission/2253446_stelaras_3dmark2001_se_geforce_9800_gt_125019_marks 2900MHz shader Neither of these shader values are possible on G92. GPU-Z reports the actual shader value, not the value set. The steps are 2862 and 2916MHz. Also: His memory. "1240"MHz. This does not exist either. The controller sets 1242MHz. I'm not sure about 1220MHz either. The standard values are 1215MHz and 1224, but I will double check that. Even weirder, his 3D05: http://hwbot.org/image/731882.jpg Sh…

  8. Started by K404,

    http://hwbot.org/submission/2303620_ice_angel_aquamark_geforce_gtx_280_481550_marks/ http://hwbot.org/submission/2303883_redcobra_aquamark_geforce_gtx_280_482979_marks Maybe we should watch their scores for a while and see if they do something REALLY dumb that removes all doubt. I know the vendor ID is different. Big deal. BIOS flash takes less time than swapping a card and pulling it down to temp. The mobo, RAM, OS and CPU are clearly the same. Has anyone met Iceangel and Redcobra? I noticed that Iceangel did not submit much while Cobra was banned. They aren't the same person, are they?

  9. Lets hope MSI take a close look eh.

  10. Started by K404,

    http://hwbot.org/submission/2273512_poparamiro_3dmark_vantage___performance_geforce_8800_gts_320_mb_9360_marks 828-1998 on air?? For Vantage???? The current draw says "no" I think. OCP cannot be totally removed from these cards. Before I found the OCP mods for G80, I found that the less voltage I used, the fewer problems I had with OCP. These cards are very temperature sensitive If I can find some motivation, I might stick mine under cold and see what temps I need for 828-1998. I'll film it. The difference will be in his not having an IHS. I'm not even gonna attempt removal. Apparently they're soldered on

  11. Started by K404,

    I know that Rev4 has some problems when it comes to fully blocking a user and their scores.. For example, RedCobra and Giancarlo have had their points removed and their scores are invisible.... but the scores still affect the rankings. Do HWB have an idea and timeline in place to fix this? The other problem is that, unless the blocked score is gold, it is invisible, so other users in the same category have no idea what score they need to beat I hope you know what I mean, I can take screenies or videos to make it clearer.

  12. Started by K404,

    I am *not happy* to start this thread in here, but I believe in treating weird results with consistency. http://hwbot.org/submission/2194714_monstru_3dmark03_geforce_gtx_580_177355_marks http://hwbot.org/submission/2195069_matose_3dmark03_geforce_gtx_580_177429_marks If you open both screenshots up in paint or Photoshop and place them on top of each other, most of the windows line up exactly. IMHO, that's not possible unless the scores were both done without a restart, which in turn would suggest it's the same card. The difference in GT1 FPS also suggest one was a clean run and one was dirty.

  13. Started by Sweet,

    This user is fake, stolen cpu-z's validation to others members of Hwbot. Dont allow to join your team. http://hwbot.org/community/user/agustin_ http://hwbot.org/community/user/rojas_nob http://hwbot.org/community/user/rojas_nobahotmail.com http://hwbot.org/community/user/rojitas_nob'>http://hwbot.org/community/user/rojitas_nob http://hwbot.org/community/user/rojitasnob http://hwbot.org/community/user/rojitas Until now all banned Sw

    • 0 replies
    • 4.2k views
  14. Impossible to have HDR/SM3.0 score with the GeForce 6150 / check all other scores, no one has a HDR/SM300 score. http://www.hwbot.org/community/submission/667017_ferdinand_3dmark06_geforce_6150_420_marks Maybe using the Geforce 6150 SE, but according to 6150 SE submissions, 3DMark06 never failed to recognize correctly the 6150 SE

    • 0 replies
    • 4.1k views
  15. Is Elsa (seems to be an Asian brand according to their website) very common in Germany ? For old graphic cards like GeForce2/3

    • 6 replies
    • 4.3k views
  16. Started by K404,

    http://hwbot.org/signature.img?iid=265709&thumb=false&iehack=.jpg http://hwbot.org/community/submission/904544_neoforce_superpi_32m_core_i7_860_7min_21sec_660ms http://hwbot.org/signature.img?iid=265466&thumb=false&iehack=.jpg http://hwbot.org/community/submission/904242_pofigist_superpi_32m_core_i7_860_7min_18sec_770ms Pofigist and Neoforce.... should know better

  17. Started by K404,

    http://hwbot.org/community/submission/2122983_fabi_aquamark_radeon_hd_5870_443828_marks http://hwbot.org/community/submission/2128363_zerobsb_aquamark_radeon_hd_5870_443262_marks http://hwbot.org/community/submission/2122557_rbuass_aquamark_radeon_hd_5870_448647_marks Very similar MHz and screenshot style, even if the windows are moved around a bit Possibly some more in 3D03 and 3D05: http://hwbot.org/community/submission/963185_rbuass_3dmark03_radeon_hd_5870_108885_marks http://hwbot.org/community/submission/963555_guerreiro215_3dmark03_radeon_hd_5870_108326_marks http://hwbot.org/community/submission/995735_rbuass_3dmark0…

  18. Started by K404,

    I'm more convinced of this accusation.... http://hwbot.org/community/submission/2112803_nachtfalke_3dmark2001_se_geforce_gtx_260_216sp_107891_marks http://hwbot.org/community/submission/2113913_err0r_3dmark2001_se_geforce_gtx_260_216sp_108548_marks http://hwbot.org/community/submission/2112543_nachtfalke_3dmark03_geforce_gtx_260_216sp_72015_marks http://hwbot.org/community/submission/2111364_err0r_3dmark03_geforce_gtx_260_216sp_72200_marks http://hwbot.org/community/submission/2112545_nachtfalke_3dmark05_geforce_gtx_260_216sp_38034_marks http://hwbot.org/community/submission/2111367_err0r_3dmark05_geforce_gtx_260_216sp_38058…

  19. Started by |ron,

    Please tell me if it's correct to post here or we are supposed to post in the oc crime center main forum. Anyway, I'm here to bring the attention on a user addicted to photoshop: that user is Liquid_Cooling. That guy was banned for one year, we're talking roughly about summer 2009. Then he went in the "Team HWForest" and in May 2010 we reported them here: http://hwbot.org/forum/showthread.php?t=7484 The Team was banned, but not his personal account so, this summer 2010 the personal ban lifted and he was able to post submissions. Yesterday, 29th Nov, he posted this screenshot: http://hwbot.org/community/submission/1084634_liquid_cooling_wprime_32m_core_…

    • 3 replies
    • 4.3k views