Mr.Scott

My opinion, Picture of a screenshot has never been allowed anywhere.....ever. Backround is required, so if there is no screenshot then there is no backround either so...... Technically, if you follow the stage rules requirement, the screenshot was to include board and mem tabs also. That means there are more offenders, including myself............(because I did not read the rules).:(

Very nice indeed.

I'm sitting back wondering how the CPU validation screenshots will be moderated.

They're fantastic. Wish you were closer to me.

Nice

I believe 3.1 and 3.2 are now the only accepted versions that can be used.

There wasn't any. It was implemented just like 3.3 was.

Thanks Alby. Don't be sorry.

2 GPUPI benches is ridiculous. Nobody will ever bench the old one again with the newer, easier one out. It will be a dead bench.

What are the current accepted versions then please?

If the bad examples were dealt with originally, we wouldn't be having this discussion. Matter of fact, if they were dealt with now, we wouldn't be having this discussion either. Fact is, it was let slide, so now it's only fair to let the others slide.

I will cite XTU again. Where was the effort there?

How about 3 then. x265 ver.2 from ver. 1.2 was a huge increase also. Consistency.

Oh yes you can. See CB r15 and XTU.

I have to agree. GPUPI is no different. Sorry, but that's the way it goes. Consistency is still going to be a problem at HWB?

Lol. 2 1/2 years till next election.

Shit. Try these. 8RDA6+_PRO_TaiPan_0.1_E4_ED_Bpl_3.19_17.01.zip 8RDA6+_PRO_TaiPan_0.1_E4_ED_Bpl_3.19C_18.zip

8RDA6+_PRO_TaiPan_0.1_E4_ED_Bpl_3.19_17.01.05.rar 8RDA6+_PRO_TaiPan_0.1_E4_ED_Bpl_3.19C_18.01.05.rar

I highly doubt that. Tasos is not that vain.

Nice. Tough to find, let alone brand new.

You set the bar very high. Well done.