2 actually, but that wasn't the point. The point was that there was more than the stated "none".
Now my turn. How many 3D benchers actually take advantage of that bench to gain at least a few 2D points. NONE.
That tells me that 3D benchers only want to bench 3D yet want to reap the points of both 2D and 3D by just artificially inflating the amount of 3D points available, to keep them in contention without having to bench any 2D at all. You cry that you don't get enough points, yet you don't take advantage of the points already available to you. How does that support your argument ?