yosarianilives

This has nothing to do with loopholes, the stage is misconfigured. It is dividing scores by cpu socket when it's supposed to be configured to divide scores by motherboard socket. As for the issue of 1366 where a score that doesn't count for the stage blocks another score, we solved it by manually deleting scores that don't count towards the total.

After you set 1300 in trixx does the slider extend? In my experience that's how trixx was working on tahiti for me. ie; there's a max you can set but once you set it there's a higher max.

It should only compare scores that are counting towards the comp no? So if there is currently no 1366 score counting towards the comp, then a 1366 score that doesn't count should block any scores. Also doesn't answer what's going on with 1151 as the z270 score should block a lower z170 score but it doesn't currently for our ranking. So we have 3x lga 1151 scores counting towards our total. I think the ranking may have entirely broken for this one. EDIT: Found what the problem is with the ranking. The "z170" score that's counting is actually a z97 score because the maximus VII extreme was mis-subbed as Maximus VIII extreme. However this exposes a flaw to the rankings, rankings are supposed to be done by Motherboard socket however they are apparently being done by CPU socket. This also means that LGA 771 can be done on a lga 775 board just fine according to the way the ranking is configured, despite the ranking supposedly being explicitly set up to prevent this.

Oh yeah I've seen that happen before. Still doesn't explain 3x 1151 scores

Gonna tack onto this, we currently have 3x lga 1151 scores which I know one of them will be pulled out because lga 1151 v1=v2 but needs to be done manually. However the z170 score coexisting with a z270 score makes me suspect the ranking is broken for that stage as they should both be the db as lga 1151 v1

diddo to all

Just revive it then lol, I think we're far from a decision being made. Just seems more productive to plan comps a year in advance rather than wait until after they start to start bitching.

Definitely not everyone is happy, read through the threads plenty bitching about the time

I mean two options at that point, back to back cc or skip a year, both transition suck. Lucoit seems status quo wins

Correct

That's why we need to plan when the comp is ahead of time

I'm open to suggesting different times for all comps, I just figured we should see when the community would like comps. Personally I would like Country Cup to run during the July-August time frame but that's only because the US has a bench meet then. If we want to move it up and not have to move TC then would need to be earlier like somewhere in Apr-Jun. Honestly perhaps the comps should stay right where they are, it could be I'm the only one who wants to see it move but I'm fairly certain I see several people bitch about when the comp is after it's started the past few years which is counterproductive IMHO. If you want something changed about a comp don't wait until it's too late for change to ask for it.

I think that everyone would agree that the current comp time is tough for many due to all the holidays in November/December so I propose that for Country Cup 2020 we move when it is to a different part of the year. I know the current Country Cup isn't even over but depending when people would like it to be moved to we may need to start the discussion now. Anyways poll is what time of year you think it should be, currently q4 is a bit hectic so I'd like to see it in q2 or q3.

I should be there

Glad you got it singing! No idea what my issue with it was lol, I had trouble in two different board and two different sessions

Nice result!

Oof that sucks, I noticed several scores that seemed that way. Any idea if it's affecting other gcn arches?

Nice to see big gpus! Will be interesting to see who else has one, pretty sure AU does.

Nice to see good s771 results!

Nice! I thought the clockgen only supported up to 400 in setfsb? Although I could totally be remembering lol

Set the max multiplier in bios, then raise bclk to the max you can get it to. If you get cpu subzero that helps. For validation you want to downcore to 2 cores so that it will hold the max multiplier

Message wasn't for him

Amazing

Yes, agreed people should buy retail products and run them they way they were meant. At stock.