yosarianilives

So you're saying if we all go and hit recalc on our profile that'll fix it right?

Cpu frequency is regardless of core count

Give it a few months for the ln2, got to get 1st in apprentice before that But I really have had just awful experience with the two modern giga boards I've used. I wonder what happened to the giga of yore...

Thanks for the kind words. But I think that at this point I should know better than to trust a giga board to do what it's told. Hopefully when I start doing legacy intel igp and have to switch from rog to giga for many chipsets, I don't find similar issues. At least the lower multiplier explains the "lack" of scaling from igp core I was seeing, as I wasn't increasing igp clocks nearly as fast as I thought.

This would lead me to believe that there is no xp support at all on any z370 board currently https://hwbot.org/submission/3746724_shar00750_superpi___32m_core_i7_8700k_4min_49sec_833ms I believe it's an issue of drivers. If anyone can find a way to get xp to work on z370 they'll have a huge advantage, and hopefully will document and share their method at some point.

Those subs have pts now, so it seems that the new change that was pushed ought to be working now

You're absolutely right about igp core, I did actually start to do the scaling testing last night on the apex before I found out what was going on and I more or less found that. You can see where I got frustrated and stopped when the igp didn't OC as well as I thought... https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1_Vil7cXqPkJ0uqjzhSZ1GMnV-A773P_mieUyEQhsDgQ/edit?usp=sharing

Well it looks like I owe you all an apology for being an idiot. I was doing some testing on my 7700k for hd graphics 630 to try to get some vindication and was getting really confused why my apex could only do about 1450 mhz on the igpu core when my soc was running "1926" mhz just fine. So I swapped back to the POS z270 soc. Boot at 1500 mhz multiplier just fine and I decide to double check clocks with gpu-z. To my surprise it read 1150! So as it turns out igpu multiplier is completely broken on the z270 soc, add that to the list of things that don't work right next to 1t cr. So I did the math for the bclk I was running with the multiplier I was actually running and it comes out to just about the same mem mhz that I was running on the apex. So it seems that on ss 1500 mhz really is the igpu core limit more or less. So I'd like to apologize for suggesting that you guys might've been doing something wrong, when it was really that I was an idiot the whole time. (as I suspect many of you already knew) Also after my testing yesterday I can say that it seems that the subtimings priorities are not necessarily exactly the same as on ddr3 platforms as I didn't see the same kind of scaling I'd expect. So while mem is definitely important I can't say I have a clue what you need to do other than have fast/low latency ram. Now if this was ddr3 based intel graphics I could give a fair few more pointers Hopefully I can learn a bit more about this part of my niche as I work towards becoming the intel igpu king (intel gma will also be interesting, I have about 15 boards and plans for dice lined up)

I have 2 more subs, both superpi, that are not getting ranked or pts. http://hwbot.org/submission/3805794_yosarianilives_superpi___1m_core_i5_3470_8sec_330ms and http://hwbot.org/submission/3805800_yosarianilives_superpi___32m_core_i5_3470_7min_24sec_819ms I tried to pull them up in UAT but it seems they're not they're yet.

Please close

Sold, please close the thread.

I'll check when I get home tonight.

Only half of your comp points count towards world ranking.

Yeah definitely way different from fx. Although if 2700x is anything like 1800x then we may see at most 100-200 mhz over stock boost on ambient. I think that 4.4 is probably a safe bet for max on aio.

Thanks! If I get any more across my desk perhaps we'll see some ice storm and slingshot results. I found it's geek 4 performance interesting at the very least. Had pretty decent ipc.

Perhaps many are like me where we click so that we don't have a notification for new post.

Perhaps it's a sata driver issue?

And with using the igpu! I thought that most chips don't bclk very well with igpu in use but supposedly that's not always so. Then again from my testing on OCF I thought the IMC was <2000 mhz on this chip and we see that's also not true. Perhaps with dgpu I can go even further though.

Ty, too bad you can't edit more than 5 minutes later...

You lock it to it's max boost using xtu.

So I've been hearing in other forums a bit of confusion what I mean by "most intel igpu should do 1900 mhz". I'm talking i5 8600k ofc. I've seen this every gen, top end i7 clocks igpu best, mid tier cpu second best, and bottom tier has lowest clocks. Now most gens it's not so far, look at sandy for example where my 2600k does 2260 on igp, but my pentium g870 only does 1860. The top mhz for intel igp has gone down a bit each gen. So now on 7700k I'd say top is probably around 2000 mhz for a good chip, however if you go down to i3 you'll find hot garbage. I think the fact that the cpu clocks core and memory generally lower than average 7700k should give a good indication of what to expect. On SS my 7700k can run 5.8/5.6 core/cache with the igp at 1926 mhz with 1.7v and 1.75v respectively. However on same cooling my 7350k does like 5.3/5.1 core/cache at 1.6-1.7v and 1530 mhz igp at 1.6v+ and you can forget 4000 mhz mem. I hope you don't misunderstand me to say that any issue with your core clocks on 7350k was cause you didn't know how to clock igp, I'm more saying that you'll see far more scaling from mem than igp core. For example just testing on the 7350k today I was scoring around 1800 graphics score. Increasing to 1500 mhz boosted me to 2100. However increasing mem to 3930 (best this crap IMC could do) boosted me to over 2500 pts. You can see that if an igp was 100 mhz behind you could easily make it up with more mem, especially in 8600k which has a much better imc. Main takeaway is that 8600k is gonna be nothing like 7350k was, it should be a much better experience and much less hot garbage. Shame I don't have/want z370 cause you're all making me feel like I'd almost be competitive on ss with your attitude towards this stage. Unless intel decided that now i5 get's binned like i3...

If you have a solid 3dm11 physics score and not from bruteforcing cpu core then graphics score will follow. Nearly every intel igpu can do around 1900 mhz even on ss, and unless you get an extra crap igpu you'll be within 100-200 mhz of anyone else. Also I've found very little core scaling from 1600 up to 1900 on hd graphics on 7700k. So it's mainly mem OC on igpu. Tertiary and secondary timings as well as high cpu cache clock are way more import primary timings. Also you have to use the right driver, sometimes as much as 10-30% difference from using best vs worst driver on intel igpu. I see no reason why you would need to bin igpu if you have a good imc. But of course your average hwbot member doesn't want to go outside their comfort zone and learn a new way of OCing so perhaps we should throw it out. Cause new things are evil.

Not gold yet, ddr3 2700 was almost stable. With a little more cold I could've taken the thrown.

Also this isn't win 8 (although this OS would still fall under those rules)

i5 3470 = p3470 :)