Jump to content
HWBOT Community Forums

knopflerbruce

Members
 View Profile  See their activity

  • Posts

    4290

  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    1

 Content Type 

Everything posted by knopflerbruce

  1. knopflerbruce
    We'd get our asses kicked in 3D
  2. knopflerbruce
    I need to actually bench it first. I will do it, but not yet (exams...).
  3. knopflerbruce
    There was a seller who had a few a long time ago, so I bought them while they were still available. He had 3 models, q7500, q7600 and q7700. Pretty rare chips.
  4. knopflerbruce
    I like that challenge.
  5. knopflerbruce
    Huh? There are many quads - did someone say the QX chips are not allowed? In reality you need certain cpus to be able to compete in any such competition. E6320 won't do much good here even if you only allow duals, for example. This principle does not change if we allow quads or not. Still, it says Core 2 series, and quads are definately a part of that series.
  6. knopflerbruce
    I'm sure there are people here who can answer as well. personally i don't really know, though. Something AMD based if you want to OC, unless you want to buy used parts, like 2500k. Used 2500k + decent aftermarket cooler is probably your best bet, but I barely use cases at all, sohard for me to estimate cost and stuff.
  7. knopflerbruce
    Bear Grylls HWBot edition.
  8. knopflerbruce
    You could make an LGA/PGA "joke" here too... Got too many CPus here...
  9. knopflerbruce
    Yeah. They're based on the Core 2 technology at least.
  10. knopflerbruce
    Says Core 2 family, so yes - duals and quads:)
  11. knopflerbruce
    Nah. Can't imagine those being allowed.
  12. knopflerbruce
    At least there are dual core 1000 chips out there, so that stage should be added.
  13. knopflerbruce
    Anyone tried the DFI style CCMOS? (that is, leaving the board for a few days with no battery).
  14. knopflerbruce
    1000 stage?
  15. knopflerbruce
    only massman and rich can do this.
  16. knopflerbruce
    +1
  17. knopflerbruce
    It's called RMA:D
  18. knopflerbruce
    I guess registry is key. Anyone tried to just delete anything related to rtf and unicode?
  19. knopflerbruce
    I remember this one. Did it happen again recently? I sent a batch question to a guy that didn't reply:p
  20. knopflerbruce
    I think only result mods will understand these:D
  21. knopflerbruce
    No, there is an issue with CPUz - sometimes you overwrite an older validation if you upload a few cvf files within a short time period. I was semi-aware of the issue, so I took a screenshot of the original validation - which is the FX55 one. The one that's actually displayed is the FX57 I had a long time ago.
  22. knopflerbruce
    Yes, but it's not. Some guy at XS had one like this, says FX55 on the IHS and boots 2.6GHz stock, but reads FX57 in CPUZ. http://www.xtremesystems.org/forums/showthread.php?64370-Fx&p=889817&viewfull=1#post889817 I can post a picture of the CPu if I have to:D
  23. knopflerbruce
    Each score is worth exactly the same (by this i mean that there are no factors that make one subtest more valuable than another), so there is no bottleneck...
  24. knopflerbruce
    In reality it's the relative gain in a subtest that determines how much a tweak is "worth". Like, if you improve text edit so that your tweaked score is 10x the original, then the score is 10^(1/16) times higher than it was before (=1.155, or if you wish: the total score increase is 15.5% when ANY subtest score is 10x the initial value). I don't know how effective the TW tweaks are on your hightech systems, but maybe 3-4 times better than a totally untweaked score?
  25. knopflerbruce
    scores need to be adjusted, then...
×
×
  • Create New...