Strunkenbold

nice!

So that means with higher thread count, pwds calculated need to get higher? (I actually dont understand the technical background to this "rule", nor do I see any submission fulfilling this, but it would be nice to see some clarification about this to see what a bugged run actually is)

Thats true, but this is same situation like we had with wprime. Old versions had a major performance advantage. You cant beat those scores even with better clocks. Dont know what would be a fair solution but as maxxmem doesnt receive any points anyway I would say let them disappear...

IMO db should be cleared with those old versions. If I remember correctly, there was some discussion about incorrect/cheated results.

Thx for info! I wonder what this jumper did. Guess if someone would figure out, other boards could be modded as well.

Cool setup! Did you had to mod anything? As on my Cuv4x-d, two Celerons wont boot...

unbelievable!

Würde ich jetzt so nicht unterstreichen. Muss vermutlich auch ein Mod machen...

nice score here, though you need a combination of CPU-Z processor and memory tab for valid submission. Also which cpu is this actually? As a c3 677Mhz Nehemiah probably only exists on hwbot. More complete list here: http://www.pc-atrium.de/html/viac3.html

Seems like the app doesnt moan when user enters wrong password and then it tries to load the user page forever.

You actually just have to fix the bug that everyone can submit with everything in the pentium II stage

on single cores very efficient: start /high /b

What sense would a wrapper have? How will the staff get rid of the bugged runs which are already in the db? And dont compare this bench to PCM05. PCM05 isnt based on coincidence like UC...

Started discussion over one year ago... http://forum.hwbot.org/showthread.php?t=59847&page=4 But just didnt got much attention...

Looks like well tweaked. Good job on this.

From what I saw, for me win7 64bit with 64bit JRE was always a little bit faster. But never tested on Penryns so situation might differ.

Simply, HWBot prime doesn't use HT at all.

Why not using win7 64bit or is this winxp 64bit?

For me, running HWbot Prime is faster on 2nd run and then drops on 3rd while it is fastest on 4th or 5th run. I tried between different systems but behavior was almost the same everytime across them. UCBench is like running a specific combination of threads. Running i.e. 64 threads alone doesnt achieve the same results. Especially on single cores there seems to be a trick getting a ridicules high result which looks very bugged.

Looks really spectacular. Brute force! Anyway I was able to unlock palominos on NF2 boards too. And I think others were able to do this too. So bridge mods could really work. On the other hand this could also be just a creative way to make things look legit.

This might be something for you. Your wrapper says HD4600, but Im pretty sure its done with his GTX770. Seems like detection needs a little fine tuning.

Benching done right! Very good!

Very good efficiency for this frequency. Wonder if you can reproduce this again and again or if its just one lucky run?

Seems like they released a fix for that today: I really hope that this is the solution...

Thx Mr. Ney. Though I must say this is just pure luck on the cpu.