Jump to content
HWBOT Community Forums

TASOS

Members
  • Posts

    1526
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    37

Posts posted by TASOS

  1. 5 hours ago, Leeghoofd said:

    Bots Database is weird, I have GF106, 106', 106'', plus GF116 and GF116' in here. 

    Maybe better idea to  limit it to just Geforce400 series? Wantd to have GTS450 in there as we wil be using it for Cheapaz too soon

    Added 590 and 750 chipset

    Perhaps it's a spec division

    GF106

    144/24/24

    192/32/16

    192/32/24 (mobile)

    GF116

    144/24/16

    192/32/16

    Something like that.

     

    Anyway

    In 3DMark99 ,  most of the participants will aim for a 775 combo.

    AM2 Nforce chipsets are old and dont support new enough AMD cpu gen (2-cores) , that can battle with a 775 C2D.

    In this scenario (whatever the gpu selection) wont count that much.

     

    Yeah GTS450 was built on both GF106 and GF116.

     

     

     

  2. On 6/22/2020 at 12:10 AM, Leeghoofd said:

    current standings:

     

    •  3dmark99: DDR: AMD CPU and AGP4x/8x
                           DDR2: 2 processor cores, GF 106-116(') cores, Mobos based on nForce chipset
                           DDR3: LGA775 4 cores, 1 video core
       
    Quote

    Only use videocards based on the GF106, GF116, GF116' core.

    Only use motherboards using nForce 560, nForce 560 SLI, nForce 570 Ultra, nForce 570 Sli, nForce 680a SLI, nForce 780a SLI chipset.

    Alby

    In DDR2 stage

    1)Two times written GF116 core is a typo or wanna add an other GF gen also ?

    2)AM2 vs 775 ? ... one score each ?

    3) Why leave out Nforce590 and 750 boards ?

     

  3. 5 hours ago, yosarianilives said:

    See that 3dm03 in 3d mashup got changed to geforce2, at first I was worried that they couldn't run the bench as they're dx7 cards and 3dm03 is a dx9 bench but according to hwbot results seems they all can so the bench must be able to run at feature level dx7.

     

    3 hours ago, Bones said:

    They can without issue, they probrably woudn't score as high as a DX9 card but they can run it.

    3DMark03

    All tests have been compiled and linked with DirectX 9.0 libraries. However, only a small part of the benchmark requires DirectX 9 hardware. As DirectX 8 hardware is now commonly available, a major portion of tests requires DirectX 8 hardware support. A small part of the benchmark can be run with only DirectX 7 compatible hardware. Note that 3DMark03 is not appropriate for solely evaluating DirectX 7.

    In simple words

    GT1 - requires a DX7 capable vga

    GT2 & GT3 - require a DX8 capable vga

    GT4 - requires a DX9 capable vga

     

    So , geforce2 cards will only run the GT1 test to obtain a score.

     

    • Thanks 2
  4. Over the last ... lets say several years of buying ram on Ebay , when looking for BH5 and TCCD , i had at least 10 kit , where someone had used the the original BH5 or TCCD ramsink and sticker and the pcb inside was something else.

    Same applies to DDR2 too , where for example buying Cellshock ram i found NANYA inside.

    Anyway , there will always be scams on Ebay and other places.

    P.S.

    Last post of this kind , cause we messed up the thread.

    Sorry.

    :)

    • Sad 1
  5. 3 hours ago, Tzk said:

    .... However there are Corsair versions which got Samsung or Infineon (3200C2 v4.3 to name an example). Corsair also mixed chip manufacturers across different capacities and the same version numbers. My guess is that corsair simply soldered (almost) random chips in 2005 and onwards. This list is accurate:

    https://www.hardwareluxx.de/community/threads/corsair-xms-ddr1-ic-datenbank.1038384/

    Everything is possible.

    We can never really know or be sure about anything.

    But to be honest , i give much more % in someone switching ram heatsinks to resell Corsair ram on Ebay .... than Corsair switching ram chips under the same label.

    :)

  6. 3 minutes ago, Tzk said:

    From the list you linked:

    CMX512-3200C2PT________XMS3202 v5.1 0441050-2 = Winbond -5 Rev C

    I also believe the list @stunned_guy maintains as he (or another users on his thread) owned the sticks which are listed there.

     

    That is the only result of the list , presented as Winbond and i believe it's a typo.

    G.skill and Corsair had and still have a certain labeling system for their ram products ... they never alter their labeling.

    Version X is always a specific manufacturer.

  7. 22 hours ago, Sparks.nl said:

    Auto660 designed and build the booster (FireRAM) this year. It is much better then the ocz booster when used fully. 
    This unit can set dimm voltage and set vtt percentage. He is using free pins of the memory banks for this. I still have to make this mod on all motherboards. 
    The only disadvantage is that you have to order and solder everything yourself. 

    15AD10F0-B2BB-4DD5-9231-39BA04227D5D.jpeg
     

    He is on HWbot and Discord as well. 

    Who has tested compatibility with various boards ?

    Is there a list ?

    What's the final cost of this device ?

     

     

  8. 21 hours ago, 4n0nym0u5b3nch3r said:

    Hijacking this thread for a RAM question:

    I bought some Corsair xms3202v5.2 DIMMs, does anyone know what chips these have?

    99% of known ram modules labeled as v5.x are PROMOS.

    20 hours ago, Tzk said:

    Could be CH-5.

    @stunned_guy posted a huge list of Corsair XMS on the hardwareluxx.de forums. Have a look at it, even when you're not able to read german. The list is self-explanatory :)

    https://www.hardwareluxx.de/community/threads/corsair-xms-ddr1-ic-datenbank.1038384/

    @Sparks.nl

    Woah, that one looks nice. Thanks for pointing me in the right direction, i might contact him for that booster. Sold my OCZ booster a while ago because i didn't like it. Voltage fluctuation was high and you couldn't adjust it that well.

    Winbond is not present in v5.x labels

    https://forum.corsair.com/v2/showthread.php?t=44365&t=44365

    • Like 2
  9. 16 hours ago, Leeghoofd said:

    1) As long as it is a real notebook motherboard I don't mind what you do to it, but no socket adapters and such to bench a mobile CPU on a desktop motherboard or memory

    2) DDR X265 no ASRock Dual Sata socket 775 quadcore combo, but can't configure that, so have to go the hard way

    3) DDR3 3D06 : 3 core CPUs and 3 gpu cores need to be used, either you go Tri SLi or Crossfire or combine a dual gpu card with a single GPU one. Unlocking CPU cores allowed to get a 3 core CPU. Disabling cores is not allowed!

       DDR: 1core CPU and GPU, DDR2: 2 core CPUs, 2GPUs, DDR4: 4 core CPUs and 4 gpus in total : you see the pattern ?

     

    1)About the notebook thing ... i wrote above

    2)Could be easier if limitation is ... everything except Asrock XXX ?

    3)I got it ... it was the xeon part that got me confused 

    Thanks

  10. 23 hours ago, Noxinite said:

    I think not allowing you to vmod and use subzero cooling on notebook boards would defy the point of OCing.

    I've got a bit different point of view.

    "Punching" a laptop board on a test bench (in my eyes) is no longer a laptop device.

    You can still oc a laptop (in some cases) without taking it apart.

     

    Anyway

    I pointed out what i wanted to say , it's not me making decisions.

    We can move on

    :)

     

     

    • Like 1
    • Thanks 1
  11. A couple of questions please

    1) That notebook stage , will be for real notebooks ? or will include notebook zombies too ? (meaning notebook boards on test benches heavily cooled down).

    2) HWBOT x265 Benchmark - 1080p - DDR SDRAM LIMITATIONS (Only use ASUS, GIGABYTE, Abit, DFI, MSI, Biostar motherboards.)

    Random pick of those manufacturers or we want to avoid something ?

     

    .... and this one please ( i dont get it)

    • 3DMark06

    LIMITATIONS

    • Only use DDR3 SDRAM memory.
    • Use 3 processor core(s) in total.
    • Use 3 videocard core(s) in total.
    • Xeons CPUs allowed
    • Unlocking cores allowed, disabling not

     

  12. On 6/8/2020 at 10:57 PM, alexmaj467 said:

    My article. Unfortunately, this is in Russian. You can try Google Translate. Go to the article by clicking on the image.

    But even without translation, you will see a lot of old screenshots.

    180085_O.png

    Many thanks for your effort !!!

    Why posted in offtopic , when there is a more proper section ?

    You could work something out , in co-operation

     

  13. On 5/26/2020 at 10:42 PM, King K0r3 said:

    Hello, 

    Looking for a good CPU Cooler for my XP-M Setup like Thermalright or other good ones. 

     

    Also im Looking for a TCCD Kit 2*256 or 2*512 like Corsair 3200XL or other. 

    Shipping to germany. 

    Regards

    You are looking for the best of the best ... but also rare items.

    How much are you looking to spend for these ?

     

  14. Please allow me a moment of job stress relief with this post , thanks.

    ok

    Since we are thinking or considering of letting the ES play ...

    Time to ask for something special too.

    I would like a full stage based on Intel's E7205 ,

    The only limitation could be ... aahh (let me think) , 7 cpu results with 7 different boards and 7 gpu results on Ati 8500XT please.(Preferably on Winbond BH-4 ram).

     

    ?

     

     

     

     

     

×
×
  • Create New...