TASOS

Dont loose your time testing. No Cuda support , no open cl. Period We needed nvidia 8 series and up , for this.

I guessed , that many people didn't know either. That's why i made this post. Round 1 , wallpaper had a small R1 at the top left corner. Now the R2 , is still at the left side , down lower. Anyway I would something like a hwbot staff formal statement about this wallpaper issue , just in case someone reports a result , for not using the official wallpaper for the exact round. Someone could assume , that there are other members already benching later round stages and show them on-time. Because if the "R" marking doesnt count , i can start benching for whatever round and stage i wont , whenever i like. Then i can crop the screenshot , or even change the system date , to match the stage date. Am i wrong ? ./

We have to make clear now , that we are at the beggining of this round , about the wallpaper beeing used. Should we have drama in case the little R2 logo (at the left side) doesnt show on the validation screenshot ??? Except one or two , most of the results till now , have this problem. How will the moderators handle this ?

Yes We had agreed on this , in the preparation thread http://forum.hwbot.org/showthread.php?t=160802

Yes , i agree. (especially with G.skill)

Sorry but , NOT true. You never really know , where you could find good PSC. In the past , i had 1600 sticks that did waaayyy better than 2000 and 2133. You never know until you test them.

I thought You got the modded one from the sales in here ? But it's not

Who ever wants (voluntarely) can post a photo , of the card he used. A backside with the stickers and a front side with the mem chips , would be nice. Whoever wants.

I would have expected some very clear pictures of all those Quadro's ... in this round-1. I've only seen a few of them , showing the sticker with model and s/n.

ok Very simply put. The VW Golf diesel , was just an example (and nothing more). An example of someone not knowing the truth , so no one could blame him , (for not knowing) the exact ammount of emissions. ./ Now in this specific case. ultraex2005 is an old member ... a very lowal , honest and trustworthy member of the Greek oc community. He is very disappointed with this forum post. He could probably make a mistake , in a submission , but never on purpose. When you ... among hundreds of other false detected results (in Android hwbot prime) choose his submission , to make it forum public , claiming that he did this , to get 20GP ... then , that's called targeting. and it's a kind of punishment. Except if , i am wrong. And you open such threads for every result that you are moderating. or it could have been a wrong expression by your side , and it was not your intention to insult him , when talking about points. P.S. We are. Working along side with hwbot to make it better. Dont have a doubt about that.

The application makes a false hardware detection. It does not detect an unknown device , cause it produces a valid file result. Should we punish the end-user , for following the instructions of hwbot prime application and presses the submit button ? or punish him , for not having extend hardware knowledge ? ... Should the owner of a diesel VW Golf , get punished for illegal emmisions during a road block inspection ? ... The proper solution is to fix the application. In the meantime , you can disable points for this specific benchmark.

I have corrected his score. It should be ok now.

Congrats !!! Very good board ... and cpu.

Asrock Z170 OC Formula , kabylake bios ???

CPU-Z mostly cause of rules requirements. But i also prefer Aida64 cause it offers more than enough system info.

Well ... i believe you must think this over A Team Captain , makes a comment and says : "Teams should be ashamed , for following the rules"

You could have waited just a bit more , for opening this contest. We delayed the start of this old school , cause of country cup ... and now we are starting it while country cup is still active until Dec 23. ?

There are other minor database problems too. There are scores out of order in some categories which i was looking at , the other day. I havent kept the links though. My bad

I dont think it's a good one. Looks like an average chip. All these 6098P , must be the worst bin (rejected) chips of the i3 cpu waffer. Your cpu , looks a bit better than mine.

Yes , true. I did a small research. Havli used a different GCC compiler in v2.0 benchmark.

Hmm ... The new benchmark version , gives much higher numbers.

Already done that , by TerraRaptor

Monday morning here. Just got in the forum , to see (once again) , that user liqmet is still going strong. This time , i had an other 9 year+ score reported :ws:

Thing is , that we dont need to punish him (short of). He just have to understand how things work , here. By reporting his own results , we are putting more work to the result moderators also. ... and we dont want that.

It's in this thread already