TASOS

I guessed , that many people didn't know either. That's why i made this post. Round 1 , wallpaper had a small R1 at the top left corner. Now the R2 , is still at the left side , down lower. Anyway I would something like a hwbot staff formal statement about this wallpaper issue , just in case someone reports a result , for not using the official wallpaper for the exact round. Someone could assume , that there are other members already benching later round stages and show them on-time. Because if the "R" marking doesnt count , i can start benching for whatever round and stage i wont , whenever i like. Then i can crop the screenshot , or even change the system date , to match the stage date. Am i wrong ? ./

We have to make clear now , that we are at the beggining of this round , about the wallpaper beeing used. Should we have drama in case the little R2 logo (at the left side) doesnt show on the validation screenshot ??? Except one or two , most of the results till now , have this problem. How will the moderators handle this ?

Yes We had agreed on this , in the preparation thread http://forum.hwbot.org/showthread.php?t=160802

Yes , i agree. (especially with G.skill)

Sorry but , NOT true. You never really know , where you could find good PSC. In the past , i had 1600 sticks that did waaayyy better than 2000 and 2133. You never know until you test them.

I thought You got the modded one from the sales in here ? But it's not

Who ever wants (voluntarely) can post a photo , of the card he used. A backside with the stickers and a front side with the mem chips , would be nice. Whoever wants.

I would have expected some very clear pictures of all those Quadro's ... in this round-1. I've only seen a few of them , showing the sticker with model and s/n.

ok Very simply put. The VW Golf diesel , was just an example (and nothing more). An example of someone not knowing the truth , so no one could blame him , (for not knowing) the exact ammount of emissions. ./ Now in this specific case. ultraex2005 is an old member ... a very lowal , honest and trustworthy member of the Greek oc community. He is very disappointed with this forum post. He could probably make a mistake , in a submission , but never on purpose. When you ... among hundreds of other false detected results (in Android hwbot prime) choose his submission , to make it forum public , claiming that he did this , to get 20GP ... then , that's called targeting. and it's a kind of punishment. Except if , i am wrong. And you open such threads for every result that you are moderating. or it could have been a wrong expression by your side , and it was not your intention to insult him , when talking about points. P.S. We are. Working along side with hwbot to make it better. Dont have a doubt about that.

The application makes a false hardware detection. It does not detect an unknown device , cause it produces a valid file result. Should we punish the end-user , for following the instructions of hwbot prime application and presses the submit button ? or punish him , for not having extend hardware knowledge ? ... Should the owner of a diesel VW Golf , get punished for illegal emmisions during a road block inspection ? ... The proper solution is to fix the application. In the meantime , you can disable points for this specific benchmark.

I have corrected his score. It should be ok now.

Congrats !!! Very good board ... and cpu.

Asrock Z170 OC Formula , kabylake bios ???

CPU-Z mostly cause of rules requirements. But i also prefer Aida64 cause it offers more than enough system info.

Well ... i believe you must think this over A Team Captain , makes a comment and says : "Teams should be ashamed , for following the rules"

You could have waited just a bit more , for opening this contest. We delayed the start of this old school , cause of country cup ... and now we are starting it while country cup is still active until Dec 23. ?

There are other minor database problems too. There are scores out of order in some categories which i was looking at , the other day. I havent kept the links though. My bad

I dont think it's a good one. Looks like an average chip. All these 6098P , must be the worst bin (rejected) chips of the i3 cpu waffer. Your cpu , looks a bit better than mine.

Yes , true. I did a small research. Havli used a different GCC compiler in v2.0 benchmark.

Hmm ... The new benchmark version , gives much higher numbers.

Already done that , by TerraRaptor

Monday morning here. Just got in the forum , to see (once again) , that user liqmet is still going strong. This time , i had an other 9 year+ score reported :ws:

Thing is , that we dont need to punish him (short of). He just have to understand how things work , here. By reporting his own results , we are putting more work to the result moderators also. ... and we dont want that.

It's in this thread already

They can take your Gold ... they can take your Silver ... But they cant take your memories away :celebration: