ObscureParadox

Your dry ice turns up and you get the best part of 4 hours sleep in 3 days.

I have a 3770K that does 7.3GHz on 0.9v with no cooler just bare to the open conditions. Not going to show anyone though because it's a gold chip

take a look at this page and have a look at the Hardware points section and you'll see what I mean http://hwbot.org/user/sotoss/#Points

Your points are made up from submissions with the 20 best hardware points and 15 best globals. So these results don't give you more HW points than your other 20 best which is why your points didn't go up. Your current points amount is correct.

I think what Genieben is trying to say that if that was possible then you could run the program as a more system based benchmark too.

I would give you a medal for that personally anyway Sounds like hell being forced to run all that

very nice, this is about 0.15v better than my 8350, if it scales 8GHz will be doable

I'm up for this too, will be interesting to me personally to see just how much I've been spending.

No PSC to take cold? Very nice result all the same

There is a very small bug where on the forum if you click on the name of the person who last posted on the main page of the forum under the "HWBOT Frontpage News section" and the "General Hardware Discussion" area, it will take you to the page of someone completely different. Doesn't seem to happen anywhere else. Just found it funny when I clicked on C.Ney and got BlackPhenix instead Also K404 is replaced by ivano.bevilacqua.1 apparently

Just to clarify, Socket 478 CPUs came out before their 775 counterparts despite being pretty much the same CPU. In this case the 478 CPU will win right?

Just got one in today with a batch number which isn't on here yet. 4790K L414C937 will be testing soon. VID : 1.072v

Downclocking is counter productive as using older hardware with a fast time is what will win you this competition

With which CPau though? I've never been able to get close to 2GHz with my semprons. I've also had it on good authority from a reputable OC'er that these board hard lock much much lower than 400MHz. Tempted to find one just to test myself. Edit : Not doubting your claims at all though mate

Newer version = higher score generally?

Both 1st and second place results for the 890FXE look suspect. Ram speeds seem to be a bit of a givaway, possibly a bug which is doubling the HTT speed on CPU-Z??? http://hwbot.org/submission/2427858_farid_reference_clock_ta890fxe_490.01_mhz/

The GPU temp under load is very impressive DJ

Got my 423 socket ready to go actually. Never benched it before though.

So basically as title suggests, the ranking system is broke for me and when I click to see the OC leader board I get an error. The same happens when I try to check the top OC'ers in my country. Error message: org.apache.torque.NoRowsException: Failed to select a row.

everything looks good to me

I'm not 100% certain, but I think the tridents might be BBSE. Might be worth a check just in case.

Sorry to hear your stopping Moose, had a lot of fun watching you compete with everyone back when PCMark 05 was popular

It on the bot dude, right here - http://hwbot.org/hardware/processor/pentium_4_520/

Great run Drunkcop, very nice result