The official April's Final Team Cup Warm-up thread.

[Massman]

Good luck everyone!

[FatBoyNotSoSlim]

DDR1? Fuhgeddaboutit!

[Luebke]

another warm up? =O

at least it´s final Ö_Ö

[TASOS]

Need to find my treasure map.

 

I remember , i had buried a pentium1 pc somewhere οn a deserted island in the Aegean Sea.

 

Where's my shovel ?

 

[Marquzz]

Q6600? Don't have such modern stuff...

[I.nfraR.ed]

Another warmup?

I'm already overheating...

[GunGod]

Looks like it's time to go fishing till u cycle all the junk yard

 

[vipernet]

Arrggh! I just sold my last Q6600 last week!

[max1024]

I have a question about Pentium 1 PiFast. What sockets and CPU family is allowed? Does Pentium Pro allowed? Or only P54C, P54CS, P55C, Pentium OverDrive and Pentium Mobile (Tillamook) allowed in this test?

[TASOS]

I have a question about Pentium 1 PiFast. What sockets and CPU family is allowed? Does Pentium Pro allowed? Or only P54C, P54CS, P55C, Pentium OverDrive and Pentium Mobile (Tillamook) allowed in this test?

 

 

In my opinion , NO.

 

Pentium Pro was a 6th generetion cpu (P6 architecture) along with the Pentium II cpu's.

[Bones]

Finally!

Some Socket 754 action I can dig!

[Mr.Scott]

Maxxmem will be most interesting I think.

[I.nfraR.ed]

How are we supposed to compete with older scores done with v1.82?

 

[Mr.Scott]

How are we supposed to compete with older scores done with v1.82?

 

 

Wow, didn't even notice the version.

[TASOS]

How are we supposed to compete with older scores done with v1.82?

 

 

If , we are not allowed to use version 1.82 , then there is no-way we can come close to those scores.

[Mr.Scott]

Wasn't there a latency bug in 1.82?

I'b be all in for dumping the current subs in the comp and just using the current version (2.01) to keep everybody on a level field.

[I.nfraR.ed]

Yes, there was a latency bug in some of the versions, probably 1.82.

Didn't test, but it appeared when you boot at higher clocks and then clock down the fsb a notch or two within OS.

 

Rules on hwbot say we should use the latest official version, which seems to be 2.01, but on the hwbot site 1.95 is linked.

It seems these records will never be broken.

Edited April 6, 2014 by I.nfraR.ed

[I.nfraR.ed]

I'm already close to the top scores, but only with the old version.

It's impossible with newer versions.

 

 

[Rasparthe]

If the version has a known bug then the subs should be removed, seems reasonable

[Mr.Scott]

If the version has a known bug then the subs should be removed, seems reasonable

I agree. Being that only us three have subs in now, we should get the rule clarified by MM and save the hassle later, if we're all in agreement.

[GENiEBEN]

Personal opinion, and I will enforce it unless told otherwise by staff: The minimum version to be used should be the one linked on site (1.95), although I would recommend latest version to avoid altercations.

 

If it were up to me I would delete 1.82 as well, but this benchmark can be latency bugged anyway, no matter the version

[Mr.Scott]

Personal opinion, and I will enforce it unless told otherwise by staff: The minimum version to be used should be the one linked on site (1.95), although I would recommend latest version to avoid altercations.

 

If it were up to me I would delete 1.82 as well, but this benchmark can be latency bugged anyway, no matter the version

 

Thanks for responding.

[Massman]

Personal opinion, and I will enforce it unless told otherwise by staff: The minimum version to be used should be the one linked on site (1.95), although I would recommend latest version to avoid

 

Confirmed. No reason to use bugged apps. The rules page also stated "latest version", which V1.82 is not.

 

I adjusted the rules page to reflect this: http://hwbot.org/news/1592_application_19_rules

[Johni5]

I run maxxmem and freez the system.

[Luebke]

even @ default clocks?

Edited April 7, 2014 by Luebke