Crew Strunkenbold Posted February 19, 2016 Crew Posted February 19, 2016 We want benchmarks! ^^ Quote
flanker Posted February 19, 2016 Author Posted February 19, 2016 Monday? Or maybe today later quickly, if Il have some time (instaling OS etc) Quote
flanker Posted February 19, 2016 Author Posted February 19, 2016 I was interesting for Excavator for FM2+. Its fresh, new and I have not time for deep testing. Good news is, the TDP of this CPU is 65W and running most of time at 3800 MHz because dont reached TDP base. So for you guys I tested Superpi at stock single RAM vs dualchannel 2133 MHz and quickly Cinebench R11.5 at stock. Next week Im doing at Wraith cooler review and going to holiday time to the mountain (at weekend Im out of my home also). Athlon x4 845 has basic clock 3.5 GHz and include Turbo up to 3.8 GHz. The multiplier is locked of course, this is not K version. I used highend board Crossblade Ranger and 1702 BIOS. As First 1600MHz DRAM in single channel and Superpi. Srry for 1M quality, its some bug of software - 17.581s at 3.8 GHz is better than FX-8370 at stock or than Kaveri a little. And we are still at single channel only... - Superpi 32M is much smoother than everything from AMD. At 3.8 GHz single channel in 13m 6s. Wow, for this you need FX Vishera with dualchannel and some light tweaks at 5300 MHz or Kaveri at 4900 MHz! What about if I put second modul, so dualchannel and set the clock to 2133 MHz at DRAM - 16.317s is solid - in 32M run 27s quicker than before! And result? Wow...As 5 GHz hard tweaked Kaveri or as 6 GHz FX Vishera Lol, its my personal record at AMD AIR :-D Its interesting, tke Kaveri and Excavator are more effective in 32M than i 1M. Cinebench at stock is again better...Its in comparison as 4.3 GHz Kaveri So in practice 500 MHz advantage. But main question is...It will be able to overclock? I hope so...tried quickly light OC from BIOS to boot system....So, lets go someone try break AMD WR in 32M with LN2! Unfortunatelly, I have AHCI, so post with blck 115Mhz was not problem, but I got BSOD in Windows logo With AHCI I can get into the WIndows max with 105 MHz, its not better than stock settings, cause your freqency without turbo is 3674 MHz.. Im sure, Zen will be clear winner, but we have still many months time and chance break AMD WR in SUperpi. This is the best bulldozer architecture for this one old benchmark...And hope, the BCLK issue wil be not with IDE mode Quote
speed.fastest Posted February 19, 2016 Posted February 19, 2016 Try AIDA64 Memory Test or MaxxMem please. Excavator look very good, even with less cache Nice info! Quote
xxbassplayerxx Posted February 19, 2016 Posted February 19, 2016 It looks wonderful! I'm surprised that PHII beat it in CB though! Quote
speed.fastest Posted February 19, 2016 Posted February 19, 2016 It looks wonderful! I'm surprised that PHII beat it in CB though! Maybe in PH II X4 L3 Cache helped a lot in multithreading efficiency. What make it wonderfull my 7.3GHz 6800K with NB almost 4ghz is not much faster than this, that with conditioner Quote
flanker Posted February 20, 2016 Author Posted February 20, 2016 (edited) 100%, L3 has the impact. Its the same as Vishera vs Kaveri. Kaveri is better in single threads where L3 cache is not so important. But sometimes L3 cache is very helpfull. At Sunday I can run single thread Cinebench. Doyou have PII in your hands, if you can test Cinebench R11.5 at 3.8 GHz single thread and Cinebench R10 also? 64-bit, Win7 at my side PS: for superpi its big, big impact With wazza and light OS and tighter timings it could be n around 12min only at stock If I remember, this superpi clock to clock is similar as some Core Quad or core Lynfields? Edited February 20, 2016 by flanker Quote
flanker Posted February 20, 2016 Author Posted February 20, 2016 There is AIDA and now I must going... Quote
Ananerbe Posted February 20, 2016 Posted February 20, 2016 Doyou have PII in your hands, if you can test Cinebench R11.5 at 3.8 GHz single thread and Cinebench R10 also? 64-bit, Win7 at my side I have 955BE in my home PC, and i can run CB10/CB11.5 through 4-5 hours. Quote
Ananerbe Posted February 20, 2016 Posted February 20, 2016 (edited) @flanker CBR10 1core: 4402 Mcore: 15776 CBR11.5 1core: 1.15 Mcore: 4.50 CBR15 1core: 100 Mcore: 386 PS sorry cant do 3800, if HHT=200/auto in bios - 201.3 in CPU-Z. If 199 in BIOS - 199 in CPU-Z:D Edited February 20, 2016 by Ananerbe Quote
speed.fastest Posted February 20, 2016 Posted February 20, 2016 Looks like Steamroller had better memory performance than kaveri at stock. Tweaked kaveri in AIDA i can get around 25K read @ 4.7ghz with around 2500mhz single rank memory. Quote
Massman Posted February 21, 2016 Posted February 21, 2016 The 32M is nuts considering Zeropluszero is at 12 min 17.437 with a 5G Kaveri and fully tweaked memory! Going to Guang Hua computer market to buy one of these right now ... Quote
flanker Posted February 21, 2016 Author Posted February 21, 2016 (edited) and light OC with 2T http://hwbot.org/submission/3135553_flanker_superpi___32m_athlon_x4_845_12min_12sec_78ms?recalculate=true Cinebench R10 at stock R11.5 single R15 (its bad! Interesting...) Edited February 21, 2016 by flanker Quote
ZFeSS Posted February 22, 2016 Posted February 22, 2016 Looks like same single thread performance, and huge improve for Super Pi. The question is - how far you can raise the clocks. 5GHz air and 8GHz under LN2? If I remember, this superpi clock to clock is similar as some Core Quad or core Lynfields? No, C2Q at 4GHz is capable for less than 12s @ 1M and 11min @ 32m. It's comparable with Kentsfield in 32M. Quote
flanker Posted February 22, 2016 Author Posted February 22, 2016 I think, OC will be similar as Kaveri, depends on BCLK. I tried yesterday BCLK 108 (raised in WIndows) and CPU clock was over 4100 MHz. But what I thinking, with CPU clock around 4500 MHz you will get under 10min Superpi32M Quote
The Stilt Posted February 22, 2016 Posted February 22, 2016 Michal, are you running CB at default voltages (i.e voltage not adjusted or left to Auto)? Athlon X4 845 should have Pb0 (3800MHz) VID < 1.475V. Since the CB15 score is so poor the chip most likely throttles due TDP (PPT) limit of 65W being exceed. Carrizo is the first AMD CPU / APU which can measure it´s power consumption accurately so lowering the voltage should address the throttling. Athlon X4 845 should score > 300 in Cinebench R15 at default clocks (3.5GHz base). Even the FX-8800P scores 288pts at 35/42W TDP. Quote
flanker Posted February 22, 2016 Author Posted February 22, 2016 I left the CPU voltage at auto, most settings at auto, only DRAM voltage I set manually. Thanks fortip, I can try lower voltage (but in load CPU-Z show 1.45V) Quote
looncraz Posted February 23, 2016 Posted February 23, 2016 little baby is home Howdy! I just ordered one of these (back-ordered for a month :-( ). I have at least one question: does the CPU have configurable TDP enabled? So I could set it to 45W. If so, could you do a couple benchmarks at that setting and see where the clockrates settle? After that, I'd like to see WebXPRT and Octane v2 benchmarks @ 65W TDP (if you are willing - please run them through Chrome or Firefox and let me know which you use so I can compare with Kaveri). Thanks! Quote
filmbot Posted February 23, 2016 Posted February 23, 2016 Howdy! I just ordered one of these (back-ordered for a month. Where, assuming in the States, did you get to put in a pre/back-order? Quote
Bones Posted February 24, 2016 Posted February 24, 2016 Great job Flanker! :celebration: Hey, I'll just admit it - Woudn't mind having one to test drive myself to see what I could do with it. Quote
Massman Posted February 27, 2016 Posted February 27, 2016 Spent the afternoon running around the local computer market, but couldn't find anyone who even knew the X4 845 . No idea when or if this chip will be available around here Sent from my A0001 using Tapatalk Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.