Jump to content

Featured Replies

timings? Cause single 12-12-12 win over dual 18-16-16...

 

Apples to apples 12-12-12 2933 is less than 3 seconds ahead of 16-14-14 2933.

 

Timings are worth something...but not a whole lot. Cas latency is worth the most.

Edited by chew*

  • Replies 487
  • Views 64.4k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Most Popular Posts

  • Max-Hardware_Numb3rs
    Max-Hardware_Numb3rs

    Well guys... I made it https://hwbot.org/submission/4323412_hardware_numb3rs_superpi___32m_ryzen_9_3950x_5min_58sec_909ms?recalculate=true

  • Had a chance today with what LN2 I had left. Took a good 30L in total just today.   So many runs just short of the 6 minute mark for so long, its awesome to have actually done it now.  

  • l0ud_sil3nc3
    l0ud_sil3nc3

    Was just trying the 3800x to see how high fclk went but sadly it's not over 1600 for full pot operation Ended up testing the 16c and thinking outside of the 1:1 box, along with trying a few new

Posted Images

Infrareds No cmos battery tweak.

 

Massmans not genuine windows activation pop up tweak

 

32m%20LCC_zpseo472dty.jpg

Looking good! But you really need get a board with clockgen haha

 

Where courage, motivation and ignorance meet, a persistent idiot awakens

 

Working on it but me handicapped I think is fair for now :)

Progress with 32G dual rank on a non ref clock board. 3200mhz booted and validated :D

 

1dngd6-5.png

beta bios with new agesa?

 

 

No sir. Just a persistant brilliant idiot.

 

0511 bios on prime x370

 

Bios says microcode is same as 0504.

Ok Here goes timings versus fabric single rank and dual rank.

 

Single rank 2933

IMG

 

Single rank 3200

IMG

 

Dual Rank 2666

IMG

 

Dual rank 2933

IMG

 

Conclusion

 

Single rank speed + fabric wins ( we pretty much knew this )

 

Dual rank Application specific tossup.

 

cheers

 

What are you meaning by "fabric"?

Looks like a lot of the results in the OP are being run with Win10 which is obviously bugged and not allowed

Ok been working my ASuS off on this.

 

Finally found some efficiency.

 

Now if only I could find better memory O_o

 

Your turn chispy :D

 

hwbot%2032m_zpsz2tqwqof.jpg

Edited by chew*

Ok been working my ASuS off on this.

 

Finally found some efficiency.

 

Now if only I could find better memory O_o

 

Your turn chispy :D

 

hwbot%2032m_zpsz2tqwqof.jpg

 

welcome back

Ok been working my ASuS off on this.

 

Finally found some efficiency.

 

Now if only I could find better memory O_o

 

Your turn chispy :D

 

hwbot%2032m_zpsz2tqwqof.jpg

 

I will give it my best this week my good old friend Chew :D , i am having a nightmare and a very hard time trying to install windows xp and i think it's not possible so i will do it on windows 7 like everyone else.

 

Nice efficiency you got there Chew :celebration: well done !

Can we all test at 4GHz or 5GHz, please.

 

There's more to be optimized. I've tried Win7 x86, but it appears to be slower for me, but might try a diff version later.

 

Just for a start

screen519.jpg

Can we all test at 4GHz or 5GHz, please.

 

There's more to be optimized. I've tried Win7 x86, but it appears to be slower for me, but might try a diff version later.

 

Just for a start

screen519.jpg

 

Sure will do I.nfraR.ed 4Ghz it is :celebration:

not fast or effecient but since memory is a huge factor...........

 

Dual rank pc3400 cas is set 17 in bios.

 

asrock%204_zpswkammwe0.jpg

 

Looks like things are getting better

 

asrock%208_zpswazmvzbk.jpg

Edited by chew*

not fast or effecient but since memory is a huge factor...........

 

Dual rank pc3400 cas is set 17 in bios.

 

asrock%204_zpswkammwe0.jpg

 

Looks like things are getting better

 

asrock%208_zpswazmvzbk.jpg

 

how about the 1.94A beta bios?

how about the 1.94A beta bios?

 

Recently swapped....even better.

 

Collecting results atm....

 

3200 14-14-14 running prime stable....preety impressive for pc3400 16-16-16 bin....i would expect 15-15-15 3200@ best for that bin normally...

Here you go.....taichi 1.94a

 

2x 16g Dual Rank PC 3200 @ 14-14-14-34

 

Ok so its bench stable big deal right?

asrock%2011_zpsfjgigosq.jpg

 

How about pretty damn brutal 13+ hours stress test stable? :D

 

asrock%2010_zpsw8dahqlo.jpg

I guess Windows 10 subs in 32m will always be an uphill battle.

 

Oddly enough, Windows 7 when done right is actually faster.

Edited by zeneffect

It beats Monkey but sux monkey ballz...

 

Definitely not efficient for 4.6 but efficient enough for 2800...

 

Imc coldbug is sooooooo fun...

 

32m%207-52_zpsisosw1tq.jpg

If you notice I pulled 3 secs off time with considerably less memory speed without software tweaking ;)

 

32m%207-49_zpswgsrkkeh.jpg

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...