February 23, 20196 yr It should be by now . ” K I close the topic within 12 hours, atm it will be S775 and 1366 only Edited 21 hours ago by Leeghoofd “
February 24, 20196 yr 5 hours ago, Mr.Scott said: SR-2 or no? if yes i am wasting my time on rex III but i dont have high hopse that we may use it
February 24, 20196 yr Crew Dual socket is server for sure right... single socket only... don't pull out my arm lads when I offer a finger ?
February 24, 20196 yr 36 minutes ago, Leeghoofd said: Dual socket is server for sure right... single socket only... don't pull out my arm lads when I offer a finger ? Stretching a bit . Not pulling out. You need your arms for other things ? I stil Know what you told me on whatsapp before thé comp's startet " no dual Xeon stages " Edited February 24, 20196 yr by skulstation
February 24, 20196 yr 5 hours ago, Leeghoofd said: Dual socket is server for sure right... single socket only... don't pull out my arm lads when I offer a finger ? SR-2 is hardly a server board but that's fine Alby. Just wanted to check.
February 24, 20196 yr On 2/16/2019 at 2:27 AM, Mr.Scott said: All or nothing. what if you are right and they're wrong
February 26, 20196 yr Author Don't close the subject on x79 - I have one... in my personal PC - and it's i7-4960x but it's only 4.7GHz with Noctua NHD14 at liquid metal (for silence). To participate i'd need to take it out and that very time consuming. I have no different x79 MB nor CPU. So I think I'll be able to participate with it till the end of this competition.
February 27, 20196 yr This benchmark (HWBOT GPUPI for CPU 100M) is confusing. Even for me i downloaded all the versions but still my GPU runs it. Edited February 27, 20196 yr by samus2
February 27, 20196 yr Crew You will need to Install openCL drivers for your CPU, (otherwise the CPU will not be supported by the benchmark)
February 27, 20196 yr Crew 19 hours ago, samus2 said: To me x79 is legacy hardware. And if 6 core Xeons are allowed ... 19 hours ago, samus2 said: Idd x79 allowed with a 6 core? have you both voted in the poll at:
March 5, 20196 yr Verification screenshot requirements CPU-Z CPU tab CPU-Z Memory tab With Key: Benchmark window (score and run details) Without Key: Benchmark window (view result at 3DMark.com) Web browser with link and score visible Verification link Verification link required for Global Top 20 This rule still applies?
March 9, 20196 yr one of my sub for 3dmark 11 physics reported by 'mattfleg' for not running the monitoring tool during the run. at the top it shows 27.8 min/max which might have led to reporting the sub. but you can look at 1. memory usage 2. power usage 3. temps below show idle 30/34c and load 49/52c 4. core utilisation 100% on all cores probably this should justify the sub. hw monitor pro is bugged. i have at least half a dozen screenshots showing my i7 8700k as i3 7350k or i5 750 etc. here it's showing i3 4130 as fx-8350(screenshot). now it's asking me to buy the product to show the info. non pro version seems better. now i have started using the non pro version had my problems with installing hardware info. ask for an update which windows says you don't need it(can give screenshots). but if it works that gives the best possible info. i can run in xp but not running on windows 7 home premium/ultimate sp1. not tried on win 10 open hardware monitor 0.8.0 beta is only giving clocks but no temperatures. haven't tested much but the in-built ohm in x265 is also problematic but still it gives clocks,temps and all relevant information. sub is ranked 17th of 17 submissions. have at least half a dozen processors which can better this but obviously don't have i7 4770k/i7 4790k which is the best bet. Edited March 9, 20196 yr by ksateaaa23
March 9, 20196 yr 6 hours ago, ksateaaa23 said: one of my sub for 3dmark 11 physics reported by 'mattfleg' for not running the monitoring tool during the run. at the top it shows 27.8 min/max which might have led to reporting the sub. but you can look at 1. memory usage 2. power usage 3. temps below show idle 30/34c and load 49/52c 4. core utilisation 100% on all cores probably this should justify the sub. hw monitor pro is bugged. i have at least half a dozen screenshots showing my i7 8700k as i3 7350k or i5 750 etc. here it's showing i3 4130 as fx-8350(screenshot). now it's asking me to buy the product to show the info. non pro version seems better. now i have started using the non pro version had my problems with installing hardware info. ask for an update which windows says you don't need it(can give screenshots). but if it works that gives the best possible info. i can run in xp but not running on windows 7 home premium/ultimate sp1. not tried on win 10 open hardware monitor 0.8.0 beta is only giving clocks but no temperatures. haven't tested much but the in-built ohm in x265 is also problematic but still it gives clocks,temps and all relevant information. sub is ranked 17th of 17 submissions. have at least half a dozen processors which can better this but obviously don't have i7 4770k/i7 4790k which is the best bet. The trial version of HWmonitor Pro doesn't seem to automatically update what it's monitoring. You can however fix that - At the top of the program where you see things like "File", "View", "Network", ect.... Click "View". Then look at what's seen for options in that and you'll see the option to "Clear Labels". Click that and the program will update itself to what's actually in the machine. Each time you swap pieces to run you'll have to do that but it works.
March 9, 20196 yr Thanks. Will try that. In one OS I might have exhausted how many times I can open. Asking to register now. Uninstalled and running non pro version.
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.