DopeLex Posted January 21, 2008 Posted January 21, 2008 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=689341 -> unrealistic Score (~49000) - 2nd Place has ~ 27000
Narmer Posted January 21, 2008 Posted January 21, 2008 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=688415 wtf?
pointhore Posted January 22, 2008 Posted January 22, 2008 Any moderators have an answer for me on this? http://www.hwbot.org/forum/showpost.php?p=15088&postcount=936
o polonos Posted January 22, 2008 Posted January 22, 2008 Any moderators have an answer for me on this? http://www.hwbot.org/forum/showpost.php?p=15088&postcount=936 When in score we have invalid checksum and ss missing we block theese scores
Narmer Posted January 22, 2008 Posted January 22, 2008 wrong cpu category - Johny (warforum.cz) http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=690414 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=690482 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=690421 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=690422 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=690423 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=690424 bad pifast screen - Sweet (Overclocking Argentina OC Team) http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=689290
o polonos Posted January 22, 2008 Posted January 22, 2008 wrong cpu category - Johny (warforum.cz) http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=690414 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=690482 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=690421 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=690422 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=690423 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=690424 bad pifast screen - Sweet (Overclocking Argentina OC Team) http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=689290 Fixed
Warrior_oF_Byte Posted January 22, 2008 Posted January 22, 2008 Wrong CPU, It's a Brishbane core in a Windsor category. http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=690085
Crew Sweet Posted January 23, 2008 Crew Posted January 23, 2008 Fixed I am sorry, but I do not know very well that Bench (PiFast), I have only used once before. But this result seemed to be well screen: Forgive my ignorance on this bench Sweet (Overclocking Argentina OC Team)
Narmer Posted January 23, 2008 Posted January 23, 2008 no resolution http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=672681 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=689556
Crew Sweet Posted January 23, 2008 Crew Posted January 23, 2008 Any Moderator see this: Narmer - ClockMeUp! (United Team of Poland) Wrong and Missing , CPU - Data and Grafic-card Data http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=658364 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=659335 No resolution http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=690520 CPU-Z : No , validation link of CPU-Z http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=689259 http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=658371 http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=678967 Sweet
MaSell Posted January 24, 2008 Posted January 24, 2008 CPU-Z : No , validation link of CPU-Z http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=689259 http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=658371 http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=678967 Sweet What is wrong here? Message for moderator: Please make clear situation with GF6600 DDR1 and DDR3 categories!!!
mAlkAv!An Posted January 24, 2008 Posted January 24, 2008 The new 3DMark05 'WR' is kinda typing mistake... http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=691102 will take some more years for us to reach 290693 points
Crew Sweet Posted January 24, 2008 Crew Posted January 24, 2008 http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=668396 See , sreeen...is one Q6600 not Amd64 3000+ Sweet P.d: All we were wrong, but I apologize for a single mistake Sorry for my English, I'm Spanish
knopflerbruce Posted January 24, 2008 Posted January 24, 2008 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=690195 This score was reported by a user. He thinks it's bugged or something, but I think it's ok. When I search the orb I find plenty of amd x2 / 7900gt setups that do about 30-36k in 3dmark03. Most of them have higher GPU clocks than me, but very few of those scores are with a CPU @ 2.8 and above, my chip was 2.9ghz. And I have 512mb video memory, the others have have 256mb. (the 512mb version is quite rare). Are the mods with me on this one? Edit: this COULD be an SLI run, I remember I had 2 of these cards once, but I'm sure I benched a little bit before I got the 2nd as well. If the score really IS way too high for a single 7900gt 512mb, then move it to the sli rank instead. This was just a 3dr file I found "by accident", and I really don't know much about how these cards compare to each other.
gradus Posted January 25, 2008 Posted January 25, 2008 6600DDR kszonek (United Team of Poland): http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=658176 - GOZ driver http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=658171 - GOZ driver http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=658174 - GOZ driver http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=657772 - GOZ driver http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=658168 - GOZ driver Wolfnyght (HwMania-OC-Team): http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=688385 - cheat or sli, not real on Processor: Core 2 E6400 (2.13G... @ 3701mhz Videocard: GeForce 6600 DDR PCI @ 639/355mhz Compare to this result http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=661158. http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=688299 - cheat or sli Compare to this result http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=661159. http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=688399 - not real again http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=688334 - same.... http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=688308 - NOT REAL!!!!!!!!!!!!!....... http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=641878 3dm06. 1024x768. MaSell (Team OCX).....Team OCX....=-0 and 6600DDR3 in 6600DDR..... http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=655229 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=637950 - NOT REAL!!!!! delete this! 6600DDR 551/351mhz can't do 83k!!!! Message for moderator: Please make clear situation with GF6600 DDR1 and DDR3 categories!!! And you could not correct the results? Too difficultly?
MaSell Posted January 25, 2008 Posted January 25, 2008 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=637950 - NOT REAL!!!!! delete this! 6600DDR 551/351mhz can't do 83k!!!! Proper drivers (can be whql), proper setting and system tweaks, and it's pretty easy to do And you could not correct the results? Too difficultly? 1. Bwanafost said that he will do this 2. I cannot correct other scores 3. Why others with ddr3 in ddr1 category got much more points, because Bwana made new category and don't have time for weeks to move all ddr3 scores to proper category. Why I must loose my points, but other not? I think there are same rules for all. With ddr1 and ddr3 category is more problems than with one... Very interesting is that my 2x 6600ddr3 in 2006 dissaper
phobosq Posted January 25, 2008 Posted January 25, 2008 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=573079 - no verification
MaSell Posted January 25, 2008 Posted January 25, 2008 GOZ? Read what I wrote in "( )"... WHQL, official nv drivers
gradus Posted January 25, 2008 Posted January 25, 2008 Read what I wrote in "( )"... WHQL, official nv drivers you have 6600DDR? do plz 83k on 551/351mhz clocks. compare: http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=637950 - 83354, 4050mhz, 551/351mhz http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=667805 - 74518, 4068mhz, 662/350mhz http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=678487 - 73144, 4500mhz, 600/350mhz
MaSell Posted January 25, 2008 Posted January 25, 2008 you have 6600DDR? do plz 83k on 551/351mhz clocks. Now unfortunatly I haven't got any, but look at kszonek's score. He isn't a cheater and got also nice score . EOT
gradus Posted January 25, 2008 Posted January 25, 2008 but look at kszonek's score. He isn't a cheater and got also nice score . EOT WTF?!?! LOL!!!!!! kszonek is cheater...GOZ driver is cheating! I do 110k on this driver!
Crew Turrican Posted January 26, 2008 Crew Posted January 26, 2008 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=659279 404secs are not 3 min 44.
PowerToTheUsers Posted January 26, 2008 Posted January 26, 2008 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=631560 18 Sep 2007 05:40 checked (crew) o polonos checked by a moderator (moved to right cathegory )18 Sep 2007 05:40 modified o polonos manually modified by moderator (o polonos) - reason: no reason given But it's still wrong: it's the same result as http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=591247, which is matched correctly.
Recommended Posts