Jump to content
HWBOT Community Forums

Wrong Result

THRASHER2

By THRASHER2
in Submission & member moderation

 Share

Recommended Posts

Sebastian Newbie

Sebastian

Posted
Posted

Entry can not be inspected (Failed to select a row):

n/a. 3Dmark 2001 - 32079 marks - Panansas (H.O.T. (Hellas ...) - (GeForce 6800 Agp @ 350/375mhz trophy-silver.gif on air)

From category: http://www.hwbot.org/searchResults.do?direction=&applicationId=1&teamId=0&userName=&gpu=GeForce+6800+Agp+%2894%29&cpu=&minScore=&maxScore=&gpuId=1184&cpuId=0&offset=0&displayAdvanced=false&countryId=0&dateFrom=&dateUntil=&minGpuCoreFreq=&maxGpuCoreFreq=&minGpuMemFreq=&maxGpuMemFreq=&minCpuFreq=&maxCpuFreq=&system=&minTotalPoints=

 

Entry can not be inspected (Failed to select a row):

n/a. 3Dmark 2005 - 12116 marks - S_A_V (Team MXS ModLab...) - (GeForce 7950 GT @ 756/927mhz)

From category: http://hwbot.org/searchResults.do?direction=backwards&applicationId=5&teamId=0&userName=&gpu=GeForce+7950+GT+%28565%29&cpu=%3CType+keyword.+A64+3200%2B%2C+E6700%2C+P4+3.2Ghz%3E&minScore=&maxScore=&gpuId=1036&cpuId=0&offset=20&displayAdvanced=false&countryId=0&dateFrom=%3Cdd%2FMM%2Fyyyy%3E&dateUntil=%3Cdd%2FMM%2Fyyyy%3E&minGpuCoreFreq=&maxGpuCoreFreq=&minGpuMemFreq=&maxGpuMemFreq=&minCpuFreq=&maxCpuFreq=&system=&minTotalPoints=

Link to comment
Share on other sites
  • Replies 1.9k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Days

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Days

Posted Images

Massman Apprentice

Massman

Posted
Posted
Entry can not be inspected (Failed to select a row):

n/a. 3Dmark 2001 - 32079 marks - Panansas (H.O.T. (Hellas ...) - (GeForce 6800 Agp @ 350/375mhz trophy-silver.gif on air)

From category: http://www.hwbot.org/searchResults.do?direction=&applicationId=1&teamId=0&userName=&gpu=GeForce+6800+Agp+%2894%29&cpu=&minScore=&maxScore=&gpuId=1184&cpuId=0&offset=0&displayAdvanced=false&countryId=0&dateFrom=&dateUntil=&minGpuCoreFreq=&maxGpuCoreFreq=&minGpuMemFreq=&maxGpuMemFreq=&minCpuFreq=&maxCpuFreq=&system=&minTotalPoints=

 

Entry can not be inspected (Failed to select a row):

n/a. 3Dmark 2005 - 12116 marks - S_A_V (Team MXS ModLab...) - (GeForce 7950 GT @ 756/927mhz)

From category: http://hwbot.org/searchResults.do?direction=backwards&applicationId=5&teamId=0&userName=&gpu=GeForce+7950+GT+%28565%29&cpu=%3CType+keyword.+A64+3200%2B%2C+E6700%2C+P4+3.2Ghz%3E&minScore=&maxScore=&gpuId=1036&cpuId=0&offset=20&displayAdvanced=false&countryId=0&dateFrom=%3Cdd%2FMM%2Fyyyy%3E&dateUntil=%3Cdd%2FMM%2Fyyyy%3E&minGpuCoreFreq=&maxGpuCoreFreq=&minGpuMemFreq=&maxGpuMemFreq=&minCpuFreq=&maxCpuFreq=&system=&minTotalPoints=

 

Same problem here, prolly a bug. I'll forward this to the crew section :)

Link to comment
Share on other sites
steelrat Newbie

steelrat

Posted
Posted
fixed

You three times were asked to correct these results. Why will not you do it?

 

http://hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=622461 Result on S939, but category S754.

http://hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=622456 Result on S939, but category S754.

http://hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=622459 Result on S939, but category S754.

http://hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=622457 Result on S939, but category S754.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Massman Apprentice

Massman

Posted
Posted

This is a bit rude, don't you think? If I say I edit them, I HAVE.

 

Now, apparently some scores change back to their old rankings without me knowing of it. You're reposting the results and everytime I fix them, but they change again.

 

Anyway, this problem is forwarded to the crew forums.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
RyderOCZ Newbie

RyderOCZ

Posted
Posted

Holy crap what am I reading here?

 

This is a volunteer basis for the crew here, AFAIK, guys..... lighten up.

 

That was very rude :(

 

I take it these results are keeping you or your team from earning more points? Competition is one thing but, out for blood is something we don't need.

 

Thanks for your hard work Massman :)

Link to comment
Share on other sites
steelrat Newbie

steelrat

Posted
Posted
did you check the EDIT LOG of those entrees? don't think you did, right?

 

10 Jul 2007 12:44  	created  	botservice  	scanned by bot on forum
14 Jul 2007 05:23 	modified 	Maxi 	manually modified by team captain (Maxi) - reason: corrected cpu socket type
17 Jul 2007 11:54 	modified 	Massman 	manually modified by team captain (Massman) - reason: no reason given
20 Jul 2007 10:39 	modified 	Massman 	manually modified by team captain (Massman) - reason: no reason given
20 Jul 2007 10:40 	modified 	Massman 	manually modified by team captain (Massman) - reason: no reason given
25 Jul 2007 10:05 	modified 	Massman 	manually modified by team captain (Massman) - reason: no reason given
25 Jul 2007 07:38 	modified 	Massman 	manually modified by team captain (Massman) - reason: no reason given
25 Jul 2007 08:29 	modified 	jmke 	manually modified by moderator (jmke) - reason: no reason given

 

as you can see, Maxi first attempted to fix the entry 14/07, then Massman at 17/7, then several times 20/25 July. The reason the entry could not be fixed is a bug in the "double entry" detect system, if the same entry is already in the DB, it won't allow you to post a double, so those results are already in DB on S939 too. I've fixed this now with a workaround (unclean though) until richbastard fixed this issue.

 

Massman does a thorough job moderating all these results, show some respect and patience man :-)

 

and thank you of course, for reporting them, I respect you for that, it's a mutual thing=)

 

This is a bit rude, don't you think? If I say I edit them, I HAVE.

 

Now, apparently some scores change back to their old rankings without me knowing of it. You're reposting the results and everytime I fix them, but they change again.

 

Anyway, this problem is forwarded to the crew forums.

 

Thanks for you hard work guys! You will excuse if was rude. It is simple there was a very important for me result, first on my SS.

 

once again thank you for everything.

 

Sorry for my bad english.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
  • 2 weeks later...
  • Crew
Turrican Newbie

Turrican

Posted
  • Crew
Posted

hi guys

 

the first to guys in 3dmark01 of the geforce4 mx 440 SE categorie are using a normal geforce 4 mx 440 (128bit memory interface instead of 64bit).

 

 

there's no way you can get that score with that clock & a 64bit interface.

the first guy also states in the description that he's using a 128bit card. ;)

 

http://www.hwbot.org/quickSearch.do?hardwareId=GPU_852

 

can someone move this 2 results to "geforce 4 mx 440" ?

 

tia

Link to comment
Share on other sites
pointhore Newbie

pointhore

Posted
Posted
XP2600 Thoroughbred

 

No screenshot for verification & it says 2600 Mobile it's in the wrong category

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=627433

 

No screenshot for verification & it says 2600 Mobile. it's in the wrong category

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=627425

 

I have posted these before. :confused:

 

I see you got the top one fixed. Thanks.

The bottom one is still showing up as #1 for the 2600 TB and is also listed for the 2600+ M (no points)

Link to comment
Share on other sites
kal_garath Newbie

kal_garath

Posted
Posted

hi,

 

the following scores for a X300SE are in my opinion not possible at these frequencies. It's more scores for a standard X300 (128bit memory interface instead of 64bit for the X300SE).

 

There's no way you can get that score with that clock & a 64bit interface.

 

http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=560550

 

http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=560306

 

http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=620763

 

http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=620767

 

http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=560307

 

http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=620765

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Potapicus Newbie

Potapicus

Posted
Posted

Pentium-3 850 MHz - http://www.hwbot.org/quickSearch.do?hardwareId=CPU_1016

 

category - WinPrime1024.

1st place - 1h 50min 17sec 660ms - Cydoo (Syndrome-OC) - compare url is http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=583869

 

there is no screenshot and no verification link - and the cheksum is INVALID:

Verfication: checksum: A6F78CC0 (invalid)

 

and by the way - this user has 4 results in WPrime 1024 - and 3 results has invalid checksum - and there is nothing else, what can confirm the truth of this results.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Monstru Newbie

Monstru

Posted
Posted
X1650 pro DDR2

 

Ran at wrong resolution

 

http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=564863

 

Sorry, that was a long time ago when I thought that 3DMark 2006 has the same default resolution. My bad, I just deleted the entry from HWbot myself.

BUT, soon I will bring the result with X6800, at the corect resolution, and I think you know what is going to happen then ;)

Link to comment
Share on other sites
kal_garath Newbie

kal_garath

Posted
Posted
http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=632688

 

Wrong calculation of the result - 140sec does not mean 1minute and 40 seconds, it means 2 minutes and 20 seconds :)

 

Same guy and same wrong calculation for the wPrime1024 : 4468sec means 1h14m28s but not 45m8sec

 

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=632993

 

... in fact, all the scores posted in wPrime32 or 1024 by NIKOSE have a wrong calculation.... easy to make points like that...

 

...a lot of result of this guy are wrong, the score written is not the same as that one on the screenshot :(

 

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=632985

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=632086

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=632124

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=632691

etc...

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
 Share
Go to topic listing
×
×
  • Create New...